Prev: Vaporizing electrolytic caps a health risk ?
Next: Intrinsic 1/f noise in ADCs and DACs
From: AM on 8 Jul 2010 15:24
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:42:36 -0700, Robert Baer <robertbaer(a)localnet.com>
wrote:

> Lemme see: take the sound of a tuba or cello; SINGLE source, NOT
>sound spectrum broken up into "segments".


Yes, but the discussion is about how WE reproduce them, and in such
cases, with our primitive (to a tuba) transducers, we most certainly do
break it up into bands that satisfy the physical limitations of the
transducer designs we use for each of those bands.

Try again. You lost that one, and nobody lied about a goddamned thing.
From: AM on 8 Jul 2010 15:26
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:42:36 -0700, Robert Baer <robertbaer(a)localnet.com>
wrote:

> Just _try_ to faithfully reproduce the sound from one of those (or
>other sources) with that scatter "system" that "everyone knows" is best..

Your brain is scattered. Just look at what the best of the best are
putting out there, ya dope.
From: legg on 8 Jul 2010 19:14
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:44:51 -0400, John <Ya(a)you.com> wrote:

>I am repairing two 15" Tannoys of the Gold series. A $5k unit if we
>could get them.
>
>Un oscillation in a cassette deck I was using, produced a very lowed
>sound that damaged the speakers.
>
>One of them has 6 turns of the voice coil, lose and can be glued back.
>
>On the old days I used to repair speakers using the same type of glue
>that was used on the assembling of models. A type of glue that use
>acetone as a solvent.
>Today we have better types of glue like epoxy and I believe the harder
>the glue the better the performance, the disadvantage is that using
>epoxy will make a future repair very difficult.
>
>Any suggestions ?
>
>The coil on the second speaker is open and in very bad shape. I am
>looking for a replacement.
>
>Tannoy does not carry parts for this type of speaker but there is a
>place in England that will sell me a cone assembly for about $300 usd.
>
>J.
Suggest you send out the original, to ensure that the replacement is a
proper fit. Sounds reasonable to me, considering western hemisphere
costs and your original investment.

RL
From: m II on 8 Jul 2010 22:14
AnalModulation, aka ARCHI, LiverLover, AlwaysWrong, BART!, etc. etc. wrote:

> my brain is scattered.
> I need dope. I need a MAN.


Tch tch, Archi....You were doing so well. What happened? Did that boil
on the roof of your mouth finally break? That's what happens when you
refuse treatment for your Syphilis. Why do you find it so difficult to
accept good advice?

We're praying for ya, buddy. Jesus loves YOU.




mike


From: Robert Baer on 9 Jul 2010 05:24
AM wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:42:36 -0700, Robert Baer <robertbaer(a)localnet.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Lemme see: take the sound of a tuba or cello; SINGLE source, NOT
>> sound spectrum broken up into "segments".
>
>
> Yes, but the discussion is about how WE reproduce them, and in such
> cases, with our primitive (to a tuba) transducers, we most certainly do
> break it up into bands that satisfy the physical limitations of the
> transducer designs we use for each of those bands.
>
> Try again. You lost that one, and nobody lied about a goddamned thing.
Have you tried a plasma speaker (hiss suitably muffled)?
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Vaporizing electrolytic caps a health risk ?
Next: Intrinsic 1/f noise in ADCs and DACs