Results that are much more fun
in [Math]
|
From: Sue San on 3 Jul 2010 20:17 "JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:7078bb23-eec6-4fd3-82bf-9d86edb7db88(a)x2g2000prk.googlegroups.com... > It's almost a relief now to have the results around residues as so > much of my research seemed to just kind of go over old ground--in > simpler ways, yeah, but still areas where other research was > available--or in the case of Fermat's Last Theorem, supposedly just > proved a negative. And I say supposedly as YEARS ago I long tired of > arguing over FLT, but even if you think you've proven the thing, so > what? It's a negative. It's like, ok, so you can't get certain > solutions, and that's it! Nothing else! It's like a big downer. > > Of course to try and prove FLT--not saying I did prove it but that I > believe I did--I invented or discovered (take your pick), tautological > spaces. There it's also kind of funny as over a decade ago, back in > early 2000 when I was arguing about them, I'm not sure if I'd named > them yet, on this newsgroup posters were RIPPING on me about them. > Insults flew!!! Just like now. But ok, so posters were ripping on > them, saying it was such a stupid idea, and nothing important could be > done with identities--and recently when I brought them up again, some > posters claimed, yup, that they were already a part of established > mathematics!!! > > Of course by then I'd gone beyond trying to prove a negative and > unleashed them against binary quadratic Diophantine equations. THAT > was also one of my more satisfying results, as it was kind of a > surprise that all these modular equations could pop out this explicit > result which just so happened to allow you to generally simplify all > binary quadratic Diophantine equations to the form u^2 + Dv^2 = F. It > was sort of a weird feeling. I'd argued about tautological spaces for > years. Felt they were solid and powerful, but besides FLT had only > used them with no (or limited?) success against the factoring problem. > > So it was like I BELIEVED I'd proven FLT with these things, and > thought tautological spaces were incredibly powerful, so if they were > so damn great they should be able to solve the factoring problem, and > I couldn't figure out a way (um, yeah, solving binary quadratic > Diophantine equations would be a way, which just didn't occur to me > before). And what happened was one day I was just kind of thinking to > myself like usual, hey, tautological spaces, they're really cool. > What can I do with them? And I started down the path which lead to > binary quadratic Diophantine equations. So it was kind of a random > thing. > > And the problem there was I simplified an already well-worked area. > So with computers programmed with the more complex stuff, there's no > necessity for human beings to switch to something simpler. So I ended > up in arguments on Usenet--people trashing the result as worthless-- > and that was about it! Except for Google search results. One of the > big movers that caught my attention was that I took over top spots on > searches related to that result. But that's been true for a couple of > years now as I think that result is about two years old now. Which > goes to that weird thing I get where I don't get excited much any more > as I'll do something like generally solve binary quadratic Diophantine > equations with my tautological spaces and take over Google search > results related to the research--and nothing else happens!!! > > Nothing. It's like taking over the definition of mathematical proof > in Google. I was shocked and amazed when I had the #1 spot for the > definition of mathematical proof, and even more impressed when define > mathematical proof brought up my math blog, and that was YEARS AGO. > The next interesting thing that happened there was when the Wikipedia > managed to reclaim the #1 and #2 spot at least for define mathematical > proof. Pushing my definition down to #3. But recently my definition > returned to #2, and probably long-term the Wikipedia can't win that > battle. It's just a matter of time... > > Oh, so I had finally a positive result with binary quadratic > Diophantine equations, but math people already had techniques! Worse > techniques, yes. Easily proven to be more complicated ways to do what > I'd simplified, yes. But they weren't budging on improving and how do > you make them? Can lead a horse to water but can't make him or her-- > think. > > And still I've skipped over my first clear as a bell positive result > which came back in 2002 along with what I have long believed to be a > proof of FLT--not arguing that it is but I BELIEVE it is--which was my > prime counting function. > > I argued ON AND ON about my prime counting function as I COULD NOT > BELIEVE that showing a P(x,y) function that lead to a partial > difference equation, which lead to a partial differential equation and > thus explained the connection of the distribution of prime numbers to > complex numbers like x/ln x and Li(x) could be ignored or denied. And > it was. It still is. > > About 8 years now with the best path to proving or disproving the > Riemann Hypothesis clearly out there and math people have succeeded in > ignoring it for all that time. One of the most profound intellectual > mysteries of them all. > > How did they? How could they? > > Ok, truth is, no one really gives a damn about the freaking Riemann > Hypothesis!!! I know I don't. I don't know why anyone else should > care about it either. It's more or less a muddled idea of a guy > trying to find something I did find, which mathematicians have > succeeded in ignoring for over eight years.... > > NO one appears to give a flying frack at a rolling donut about RH. AT > least not in actuality, what they SAY may be different, but as for > using whatever path is available? Clearly, no. They don't give a > damn in action, so who cares about words. > > Which brings us back to k^m = q mod N. > > Ok, so I'd tried to use tautological spaces against the factoring > problem for YEARS--failing to see the path that would later be a > general solution to binary quadratic Diophantine equations--without > success, so I branched out and went to something I called surrogate > factoring. > > Surrogate factoring was a concept that factoring one number T, might > be accomplished by instead factoring another number S, the surrogate, > which would lead to the factorization of T. I worked on that concept > for YEARS, trying to mathematicize it. > > Possibly had as many faux results with it as I'd had trying to prove > FLT years earlier--and not saying I DID prove FLT, just that I BELIEVE > I proved FLT. And worse, I'd declare doom and gloom every time I > thought I had something. As I predicted the collapse of world > civilization if I'd broken RSA encryption by solving the factoring > problem. > > --Ah the passion of youth. Being years older now and having watched > the world weather any number of crises, I'm not as worried any more. > But it's hard not to still worry, some.-- > > Ok, so I worked on surrogate factoring for years with little success, > but thought I was doing great. But one day realized I wasn't and > reversed equations, or reversed equations and later realized I wasn't, > and found that I could solve quadratic residues mod p. > > To see the dominance of that idea, search in Google (yup, has to be > Google): solving quadratic residues > > If you DO that search you'll get a page on my math blog showing how to > solve quadratic residues mod p, even though I've generalized the > method to mod N, and now gone beyond quadratic residues to mth > residues. But that freaking page still comes up #1. What gives? I > puzzle over these things. Why does the world like mod p so much? > Why? Why??!!! > > Ok, so I pondered this fascination of the world with that result as > revealed by Google searches and fiddled with it for a while, until I > got my mth residue result which has a historical oddity in that it has > T, instead of S, though it IS it would seem surrogate factoring. I'd > reversed the equations of surrogate factoring. So now it's T. BEFORE > T stood for--Target. It was to be the target number to be factored by > the surrogate, which was S, until the reversal. > > And finally I had a positive result, which was not in an area as well- > worked, and bigger bonus came later, as I found I could solve discrete > logs, and it was then a very much positive result, and it just made me > feel better. It gives you kind of a golden feeling of warmth... > > I look at that result, and say, hey, that's not just proving a > negative! And hey, that's not just finding a simpler or different way > to handle something people already think is solved!! THAT is a brand > new baby. All shiny and new and squealing with a healthy cry. > > Which is a result that is a LOT more fun. > > > James Harris can you fit that into concise equations?
From: Doug on 3 Jul 2010 20:36 "JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:7078bb23-eec6-4fd3-82bf-9d86edb7db88(a)x2g2000prk.googlegroups.com... NPD Calculation (# of self referencing words/# of unique words. Below 5% Normal From 5 to 10% Narcissistic from 10% to 15% Malignant narcissistic above 15% call a Doctor or the police I, My, me, myself 66 + 12 + 3 + 1 = 82 82/473 = 17.34% Extremely high !! *******Call your doctor or police, this is dangerous*****) Unique words:473 Total words:1555 Freq. Word 66 I 46 TO 45 AND 42 A 41 THE 34 IT 34 OF 34 THAT 24 WAS 19 SO 19 S 17 T 17 AS 16 BUT 15 WITH 14 WHICH 14 FOR 13 IN 12 MY 12 RESULT 12 YEARS 12 BE 11 NOT 11 QUADRATIC 11 EQUATIONS 11 ABOUT 11 ON 11 JUST 11 FACTORING 11 IS 10 THEM 10 THEY 10 D 9 LIKE 9 OR 9 OVER 8 FLT 8 YOU 8 NOW 8 HAD 8 ONE 8 MORE 7 BINARY 7 COULD 7 DIOPHANTINE 7 WHAT 7 SURROGATE 6 WERE 6 SPACES 6 RESIDUES 6 KIND 6 SOMETHING 6 GOOGLE 6 OK 6 TAUTOLOGICAL 5 ALL 5 WHEN 5 IF 5 BY 5 PROVE 5 NO 5 RESULTS 5 PROBLEM 5 SOLVE 5 DO 5 LEAD 5 DID 5 CAN 5 STILL 5 PROOF 5 MOD 5 THERE 4 THINK 4 BELIEVE 4 THING 4 GET 4 WOULD 4 HAVE 4 PATH 4 NOTHING 4 WORKED 4 UP 4 PEOPLE 4 OUT 4 SEARCH 4 MUCH 4 DON 4 DEFINITION 4 MATHEMATICAL 4 ALREADY 4 MATH 4 AT 4 POSITIVE 4 HOW 4 P 4 X 4 WHY 4 NEGATIVE 4 TRYING 4 NUMBER 4 WORLD 3 PROVEN 3 HEY 3 AGAINST 3 ELSE 3 M 3 LONG 3 ARGUING 3 THIS 3 POSTERS 3 SAYING 3 THESE 3 ME 3 ANY 3 IDEA 3 RESEARCH 3 HAPPENED 3 EVEN 3 SAY 3 TIME 3 SIMPLER 3 SUCCESS 3 PRIME 3 FUNCTION 3 AGO 3 BACK 3 GIVES 3 THOUGHT 3 DAMN 3 LATER 3 VE 3 WAY 3 SOLVING 3 REVERSED 3 HAS 2 DOWN 2 BROUGHT 2 WAYS 2 SIMPLIFIED 2 AN 2 WELL 2 SOME 2 AREA 2 COMPLEX 2 YUP 2 WHERE 2 GENERALLY 2 WEIRD 2 SEARCHES 2 RELATED 2 FEELING 2 ARGUED 2 TAKE 2 LL 2 POWERFUL 2 YEAH 2 THEN 2 SPOT 2 DEFINE 2 GONE 2 BLOG 2 WIKIPEDIA 2 BEYOND 2 LEAST 2 AVAILABLE 2 FINALLY 2 BELIEVED 2 TECHNIQUES 2 WORSE 2 YES 2 THINGS 2 MAKE 2 CAME 2 BIG 2 COUNTING 2 RIPPING 2 SHOWING 2 GREAT 2 SHOULD 2 PARTIAL 2 EQUATION 2 NUMBERS 2 PROVING 2 RIEMANN 2 HYPOTHESIS 2 CLEARLY 2 SUCCEEDED 2 IGNORING 2 ALSO 2 FREAKING 2 KNOW 2 COURSE 2 FIND 2 GIVE 2 DIFFERENT 2 OLD 2 N 2 SEE 2 SUPPOSEDLY 2 BEFORE 2 CONCEPT 2 DAY 2 INSTEAD 2 PROVED 2 REALIZED 2 WASN 2 REALLY 2 FOUND 2 RECENTLY 2 PAGE 2 THOUGH 2 MTH 2 UNTIL 2 TARGET 2 NEW 1 TRY 1 COMPUTERS 1 PROGRAMMED 1 OTHER 1 STUFF 1 NECESSITY 1 HUMAN 1 BEINGS 1 SWITCH 1 SATISFYING 1 ENDED 1 ARGUMENTS 1 USENET 1 SURPRISE 1 TRASHING 1 WORTHLESS 1 EXCEPT 1 NEWSGROUP 1 AROUND 1 MOVERS 1 CAUGHT 1 ATTENTION 1 TOOK 1 TOP 1 SPOTS 1 MODULAR 1 POP 1 BEEN 1 TRUE 1 COUPLE 1 GO 1 TWO 1 GOES 1 EXPLICIT 1 EXCITED 1 RELIEF 1 CASE 1 HAPPENS 1 TAKING 1 INSULTS 1 ALLOW 1 FLEW 1 SHOCKED 1 AMAZED 1 SIMPLIFY 1 IMPRESSED 1 FORM 1 U 1 DV 1 NEXT 1 INTERESTING 1 F 1 MANAGED 1 RECLAIM 1 SORT 1 SUCH 1 PUSHING 1 RETURNED 1 PROBABLY 1 TERM 1 WIN 1 BATTLE 1 MATTER 1 STUPID 1 OH 1 INVENTED 1 IMPORTANT 1 FELT 1 SOLID 1 DISCOVERED 1 EASILY 1 COMPLICATED 1 WEREN 1 BUDGING 1 IMPROVING 1 BESIDES 1 TIRED 1 HORSE 1 WATER 1 HIM 1 HER 1 SKIPPED 1 FIRST 1 CLEAR 1 BELL 1 ONLY 1 ALONG 1 USED 1 DONE 1 LIMITED 1 YOUR 1 IDENTITIES 1 PICK 1 Y 1 FERMAT 1 DIFFERENCE 1 LAST 1 DIFFERENTIAL 1 THUS 1 EXPLAINED 1 CONNECTION 1 DISTRIBUTION 1 AGAIN 1 LN 1 LI 1 IGNORED 1 DENIED 1 BEST 1 INCREDIBLY 1 DISPROVING 1 CERTAIN 1 CLAIMED 1 SOLUTIONS 1 ABLE 1 FUNNY 1 MOST 1 PROFOUND 1 INTELLECTUAL 1 MYSTERIES 1 TRUTH 1 COULDN 1 FIGURE 1 DECADE 1 UM 1 ANYONE 1 CARE 1 EITHER 1 LESS 1 MUDDLED 1 GUY 1 PART 1 MATHEMATICIANS 1 EIGHT 1 APPEARS 1 ESTABLISHED 1 FLYING 1 FRACK 1 ROLLING 1 DONUT 1 RH 1 ACTUALITY 1 MAY 1 DIDN 1 USING 1 WHATEVER 1 ACTION 1 WHO 1 CARES 1 WORDS 1 BRINGS 1 US 1 K 1 Q 1 OCCUR 1 MATHEMATICS 1 TRIED 1 USE 1 FAILING 1 THEOREM 1 THINKING 1 GENERAL 1 SOLUTION 1 WITHOUT 1 BRANCHED 1 WENT 1 CALLED 1 MYSELF 1 USUAL 1 EARLY 1 MIGHT 1 ACCOMPLISHED 1 RE 1 ANOTHER 1 FACTORIZATION 1 MATHEMATICIZE 1 POSSIBLY 1 MANY 1 FAUX 1 EARLIER 1 DECLARE 1 DOOM 1 GLOOM 1 EVERY 1 PREDICTED 1 COLLAPSE 1 SEEMED 1 CIVILIZATION 1 BROKEN 1 RSA 1 ENCRYPTION 1 AH 1 PASSION 1 YOUTH 1 BEING 1 OLDER 1 HAVING 1 WATCHED 1 WEATHER 1 CRISES 1 WORRIED 1 HARD 1 WORRY 1 LITTLE 1 DOING 1 COOL 1 GROUND 1 STARTED 1 AREAS 1 DOMINANCE 1 UNLEASHED 1 DOWNER 1 RANDOM 1 GENERALIZED 1 METHOD 1 SURE 1 COMES 1 PUZZLE 1 DOES 1 PONDERED 1 FASCINATION 1 REVEALED 1 FIDDLED 1 WHILE 1 ALMOST 1 GOT 1 RESIDUE 1 HISTORICAL 1 ODDITY 1 SEEM 1 STOOD 1 NAMED 1 FACTORED 1 REVERSAL 1 BIGGER 1 BONUS 1 DISCRETE 1 LOGS 1 VERY 1 MADE 1 FEEL 1 BETTER 1 GOLDEN 1 WARMTH 1 LOOK 1 FINDING 1 HANDLE 1 SOLVED 1 BRAND 1 YET 1 BABY 1 SHINY 1 SQUEALING 1 HEALTHY 1 CRY 1 LOT 1 FUN 1 JAMES 1 HARRIS
From: Owen Jacobson on 4 Jul 2010 00:13 On 2010-07-03 20:36:21 -0400, Doug said: > "JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:7078bb23-eec6-4fd3-82bf-9d86edb7db88(a)x2g2000prk.googlegroups.com... > > NPD Calculation (# of self referencing words/# of unique words. > Below 5% Normal > From 5 to 10% Narcissistic > from 10% to 15% Malignant narcissistic > above 15% call a Doctor or the police > > I, My, me, myself > > 66 + 12 + 3 + 1 = 82 > > 82/473 = 17.34% Extremely high !! > > *******Call your doctor or police, this is dangerous*****) > > > Unique words:473 Total words:1555 > Freq. Word *snip* The results for two-word constellations are somewhat interesting, I think. With the single-occurrence phrases omitted: Freq. Constellation 2 A DAMN 2 A PARTIAL 2 A POSITIVE 2 A WAY 2 ABOUT IT 2 ABOUT THEM 2 AGAINST THE 2 AND NOTHING 2 AND THAT 2 ANY MORE 2 AT LEAST 2 BACK IN 2 BELIEVE I 2 BUT THAT 2 COULD BE 2 COULD SOLVE 2 COUNTING FUNCTION 2 DEFINE MATHEMATICAL 2 DEFINITION OF 2 DID PROVE 2 FLT NOT 2 FOR A 2 GIVE A 2 GONE BEYOND 2 GOOGLE SEARCH 2 HAVE SUCCEEDED 2 HEY THAT'S 2 I WASN'T 2 I WORKED 2 I'M NOT 2 IF I'D 2 IF YOU 2 IN GOOGLE 2 IN IGNORING 2 IS ABOUT 2 IT FOR 2 JUST KIND 2 MATH BLOG 2 MATH PEOPLE 2 MOD N 2 MY DEFINITION 2 MY MATH 2 MY PRIME 2 NO ONE 2 NOT IN 2 NOT JUST 2 NOT SAYING 2 NOTHING ELSE 2 OF COURSE 2 OF MATHEMATICAL 2 OF MY 2 ONE DAY 2 PEOPLE ALREADY 2 POSTERS WERE 2 PRIME COUNTING 2 REALIZED I 2 RELATED TO 2 RESIDUES MOD 2 RESULT AND 2 RESULT AS 2 REVERSED EQUATIONS 2 RIEMANN HYPOTHESIS 2 RIPPING ON 2 SAYING I 2 SEARCH RESULTS 2 SEE THE 2 SO IT 2 SO MUCH 2 SOLVE QUADRATIC 2 SOMETHING I 2 SUCCEEDED IN 2 SURROGATE WHICH 2 THAT IS 2 THAT IT 2 THAT'S NOT 2 THE #1 2 THE DEFINITION 2 THE PATH 2 THE SURROGATE 2 THE WIKIPEDIA 2 THERE WAS 2 THESE THINGS 2 THOUGHT I 2 TO A 2 TO BINARY 2 TO PROVE 2 TO SEE 2 TO SOLVE 2 TO SOMETHING 2 TO THAT 2 WAS KIND 2 WASN'T AND 2 WERE RIPPING 2 WHICH JUST 2 WHICH LEAD 2 WITH IT 2 WITH THE 2 WORKED ON 2 YEARS AGO 2 YEARS NOW 3 AND I 3 AND IT 3 BE A 3 I BELIEVE 3 I COULD 3 I DON'T 3 IS A 3 IT IS 3 IT'S LIKE 3 MOD P 3 NEGATIVE AND 3 ONE OF 3 PROVE FLT 3 THAT WAS 3 THE WORLD 3 THEY WERE 3 TO THE 3 WHEN I 3 WHICH WAS 4 A NEGATIVE 4 AS I 4 FACTORING PROBLEM 4 FOR YEARS 4 I DID 4 I HAD 4 I WAS 4 LEAD TO 4 MATHEMATICAL PROOF 4 OF THE 4 POSITIVE RESULT 4 QUADRATIC RESIDUES 4 RESULT WHICH 4 THAT I 4 THAT RESULT 4 THE FACTORING 4 TRYING TO 5 OF A 5 OK SO 5 SO I 5 SURROGATE FACTORING 5 TO BE 6 KIND OF 6 TAUTOLOGICAL SPACES 7 BINARY QUADRATIC 7 DIOPHANTINE EQUATIONS 7 QUADRATIC DIOPHANTINE 8 IT WAS Lots of specific ritual phrases relating to James' skewed understanding of math here: "MATHEMATICAL PROOF", "QUADRATIC RESIDUES", "SURROGATE FACTORING", "TAUTOLOGICAL SPACES", and others. James' narcissism shows through clearly, too: "I", "MY", "ME" phrases dominate. There is no collaboration in his world: the only other group that's well-represented is "THEY", reflecting a beleagured, "only sane man" state of mind. His obsession with the internet as the one valid authority is visible, though less ritualized so far: phrases involving google, blogs, wikipedia, and so on are not so frequent as individual references. I wonder what happens if you apply this to one of his paranoid conspiracy rants... -o
From: Owen Jacobson on 4 Jul 2010 00:36 On 2010-07-04 00:13:15 -0400, Owen Jacobson said: > On 2010-07-03 20:36:21 -0400, Doug said: > >> "JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:7078bb23-eec6-4fd3-82bf-9d86edb7db88(a)x2g2000prk.googlegroups.com... >> >> NPD Calculation (# of self referencing words/# of unique words. >> Below 5% Normal >> From 5 to 10% Narcissistic >> from 10% to 15% Malignant narcissistic >> above 15% call a Doctor or the police >> >> I, My, me, myself >> >> 66 + 12 + 3 + 1 = 82 >> >> 82/473 = 17.34% Extremely high !! >> >> *******Call your doctor or police, this is dangerous*****) >> >> >> Unique words:473 Total words:1555 >> Freq. Word > *snip* > > The results for two-word constellations are somewhat interesting, I > think. With the single-occurrence phrases omitted: > > Freq. Constellation > > 2 A DAMN > 2 A PARTIAL > 2 A POSITIVE > 2 A WAY > 2 ABOUT IT > 2 ABOUT THEM > 2 AGAINST THE > 2 AND NOTHING > 2 AND THAT > 2 ANY MORE > 2 AT LEAST > 2 BACK IN > 2 BELIEVE I > 2 BUT THAT > 2 COULD BE > 2 COULD SOLVE > 2 COUNTING FUNCTION > 2 DEFINE MATHEMATICAL > 2 DEFINITION OF > 2 DID PROVE > 2 FLT NOT > 2 FOR A > 2 GIVE A > 2 GONE BEYOND > 2 GOOGLE SEARCH > 2 HAVE SUCCEEDED > 2 HEY THAT'S > 2 I WASN'T > 2 I WORKED > 2 I'M NOT > 2 IF I'D > 2 IF YOU > 2 IN GOOGLE > 2 IN IGNORING > 2 IS ABOUT > 2 IT FOR > 2 JUST KIND > 2 MATH BLOG > 2 MATH PEOPLE > 2 MOD N > 2 MY DEFINITION > 2 MY MATH > 2 MY PRIME > 2 NO ONE > 2 NOT IN > 2 NOT JUST > 2 NOT SAYING > 2 NOTHING ELSE > 2 OF COURSE > 2 OF MATHEMATICAL > 2 OF MY > 2 ONE DAY > 2 PEOPLE ALREADY > 2 POSTERS WERE > 2 PRIME COUNTING > 2 REALIZED I > 2 RELATED TO > 2 RESIDUES MOD > 2 RESULT AND > 2 RESULT AS > 2 REVERSED EQUATIONS > 2 RIEMANN HYPOTHESIS > 2 RIPPING ON > 2 SAYING I > 2 SEARCH RESULTS > 2 SEE THE > 2 SO IT > 2 SO MUCH > 2 SOLVE QUADRATIC > 2 SOMETHING I > 2 SUCCEEDED IN > 2 SURROGATE WHICH > 2 THAT IS > 2 THAT IT > 2 THAT'S NOT > 2 THE #1 > 2 THE DEFINITION > 2 THE PATH > 2 THE SURROGATE > 2 THE WIKIPEDIA > 2 THERE WAS > 2 THESE THINGS > 2 THOUGHT I > 2 TO A > 2 TO BINARY > 2 TO PROVE > 2 TO SEE > 2 TO SOLVE > 2 TO SOMETHING > 2 TO THAT > 2 WAS KIND > 2 WASN'T AND > 2 WERE RIPPING > 2 WHICH JUST > 2 WHICH LEAD > 2 WITH IT > 2 WITH THE > 2 WORKED ON > 2 YEARS AGO > 2 YEARS NOW > 3 AND I > 3 AND IT > 3 BE A > 3 I BELIEVE > 3 I COULD > 3 I DON'T > 3 IS A > 3 IT IS > 3 IT'S LIKE > 3 MOD P > 3 NEGATIVE AND > 3 ONE OF > 3 PROVE FLT > 3 THAT WAS > 3 THE WORLD > 3 THEY WERE > 3 TO THE > 3 WHEN I > 3 WHICH WAS > 4 A NEGATIVE > 4 AS I > 4 FACTORING PROBLEM > 4 FOR YEARS > 4 I DID > 4 I HAD > 4 I WAS > 4 LEAD TO > 4 MATHEMATICAL PROOF > 4 OF THE > 4 POSITIVE RESULT > 4 QUADRATIC RESIDUES > 4 RESULT WHICH > 4 THAT I > 4 THAT RESULT > 4 THE FACTORING > 4 TRYING TO > 5 OF A > 5 OK SO > 5 SO I > 5 SURROGATE FACTORING > 5 TO BE > 6 KIND OF > 6 TAUTOLOGICAL SPACES > 7 BINARY QUADRATIC > 7 DIOPHANTINE EQUATIONS > 7 QUADRATIC DIOPHANTINE > 8 IT WAS > > Lots of specific ritual phrases relating to James' skewed understanding > of math here: "MATHEMATICAL PROOF", "QUADRATIC RESIDUES", "SURROGATE > FACTORING", "TAUTOLOGICAL SPACES", and others. James' narcissism shows > through clearly, too: "I", "MY", "ME" phrases dominate. There is no > collaboration in his world: the only other group that's > well-represented is "THEY", reflecting a beleagured, "only sane man" > state of mind. His obsession with the internet as the one valid > authority is visible, though less ritualized so far: phrases involving > google, blogs, wikipedia, and so on are not so frequent as individual > references. > > I wonder what happens if you apply this to one of his paranoid > conspiracy rants... > > -o Seems I was a little quick to throw away the 1-hit entries. There are some interesting patterns in there: 1 I ARGUED 1 I BELIEVED 1 I BRANCHED 1 I BROUGHT 1 I CALLED 1 I COULDN'T 1 I DO 1 I ENDED 1 I FOUND 1 I GET 1 I GOT 1 I HAVE 1 I INVENTED 1 I KNOW 1 I LONG 1 I LOOK 1 I PONDERED 1 I PREDICTED 1 I PROVED 1 I PUZZLE 1 I SAY 1 I SIMPLIFIED 1 I STARTED 1 I THINK 1 I THOUGHT 1 I TOOK 1 I'D ARGUED 1 I'D BROKEN 1 I'D DECLARE 1 I'D GONE 1 I'D HAD 1 I'D NAMED 1 I'D PROVEN 1 I'D REVERSED 1 I'D SIMPLIFIED 1 I'D TRIED 1 I'LL DO 1 I'VE GENERALIZED 1 I'VE SKIPPED for example. Here's the unexpurgated list (warning: long). 1 #1 AND 1 #1 SPOT 1 #1 WHAT 1 #2 AND 1 #2 SPOT 1 #3 BUT 1 + DV^2 1 2000 WHEN 1 2002 ALONG 1 8 YEARS 1 = F 1 = Q 1 A BELL 1 A BIG 1 A BRAND 1 A CONCEPT 1 A COUPLE 1 A DECADE 1 A FLYING 1 A GENERAL 1 A GOLDEN 1 A GUY 1 A HEALTHY 1 A HISTORICAL 1 A HORSE 1 A LOT 1 A MATTER 1 A MUDDLED 1 A P 1 A PAGE 1 A PART 1 A PROOF 1 A RANDOM 1 A RELIEF 1 A RESULT 1 A ROLLING 1 A SIMPLER 1 A STUPID 1 A SURPRISE 1 A VERY 1 A WEIRD 1 A WHILE 1 ABLE TO 1 ABOUT 8 1 ABOUT MY 1 ABOUT RH 1 ABOUT TAUTOLOGICAL 1 ABOUT THE 1 ABOUT TWO 1 ABOUT WORDS 1 ACCOMPLISHED BY 1 ACTION SO 1 ACTUALITY WHAT 1 AGAIN SOME 1 AGAINST BINARY 1 AGO BACK 1 AGO I 1 AGO THE 1 AH THE 1 ALL BINARY 1 ALL HOW 1 ALL SHINY 1 ALL THAT 1 ALL THESE 1 ALLOW YOU 1 ALMOST A 1 ALONG WITH 1 ALREADY A 1 ALREADY HAD 1 ALREADY THINK 1 ALREADY WELL-WORKED 1 ALSO KIND 1 ALSO ONE 1 AMAZED WHEN 1 AN ALREADY 1 AN AREA 1 AND #2 1 AND AMAZED 1 AND BIGGER 1 AND EVEN 1 AND FIDDLED 1 AND FINALLY 1 AND FOUND 1 AND GLOOM 1 AND HAVING 1 AND HEY 1 AND HOW 1 AND LATER 1 AND LI 1 AND MATH 1 AND NEW 1 AND NOT 1 AND NOW 1 AND ON 1 AND POWERFUL 1 AND PROBABLY 1 AND PROVE 1 AND RECENTLY 1 AND REVERSED 1 AND SAY 1 AND SQUEALING 1 AND STILL 1 AND TAKE 1 AND THAT'S 1 AND THE 1 AND THOUGHT 1 AND THUS 1 AND UNLEASHED 1 AND WENT 1 AND WHAT 1 AND WORSE 1 ANOTHER NUMBER 1 ANY NUMBER 1 ANYONE ELSE 1 APPEARS TO 1 AREA AS 1 AREA SO 1 AREAS WHERE 1 ARGUED ABOUT 1 ARGUED ON 1 ARGUING ABOUT 1 ARGUING OVER 1 ARGUING THAT 1 ARGUMENTS ON 1 AROUND RESIDUES 1 AS A 1 AS FOR 1 AS I'D 1 AS I'LL 1 AS IT 1 AS MANY 1 AS OVER 1 AS REVEALED 1 AS SO 1 AS WELL- 1 AS WORRIED 1 AS WORTHLESS 1 AS YEARS 1 AT A 1 AT THAT 1 ATTENTION WAS 1 AVAILABLE CLEARLY 1 AVAILABLE OR 1 BABY ALL 1 BACK TO 1 BATTLE IT'S 1 BE ABLE 1 BE ACCOMPLISHED 1 BE DIFFERENT 1 BE DONE 1 BE FACTORED 1 BE GOOGLE 1 BE IGNORED 1 BE MORE 1 BE THE 1 BEEN TRUE 1 BEFORE AND 1 BEFORE T 1 BEING YEARS 1 BEINGS TO 1 BELIEVE IT 1 BELIEVE THAT 1 BELIEVED I'D 1 BELIEVED TO 1 BELL POSITIVE 1 BESIDES FLT 1 BEST PATH 1 BETTER IT 1 BEYOND QUADRATIC 1 BEYOND TRYING 1 BIG DOWNER 1 BIG MOVERS 1 BIGGER BONUS 1 BLOG AND 1 BLOG SHOWING 1 BONUS CAME 1 BRANCHED OUT 1 BRAND NEW 1 BRINGS US 1 BROKEN RSA 1 BROUGHT THEM 1 BROUGHT UP 1 BUDGING ON 1 BUT AS 1 BUT BESIDES 1 BUT CAN'T 1 BUT EVEN 1 BUT I 1 BUT IT'S 1 BUT MATH 1 BUT OK 1 BUT ONE 1 BUT RECENTLY 1 BUT STILL 1 BUT THAT'S 1 BUT THEY 1 BUT THOUGHT 1 BY GOOGLE 1 BY INSTEAD 1 BY SOLVING 1 BY THE 1 BY THEN 1 CALLED SURROGATE 1 CAME BACK 1 CAME LATER 1 CAN I 1 CAN LEAD 1 CAN'T GET 1 CAN'T MAKE 1 CAN'T WIN 1 CARE ABOUT 1 CARES ABOUT 1 CASE OF 1 CAUGHT MY 1 CERTAIN SOLUTIONS 1 CIVILIZATION IF 1 CLAIMED YUP 1 CLEAR AS 1 CLEARLY NO 1 CLEARLY OUT 1 COLLAPSE OF 1 COMES UP 1 COMPLEX NUMBERS 1 COMPLEX STUFF 1 COMPLICATED WAYS 1 COMPUTERS PROGRAMMED 1 CONCEPT FOR 1 CONCEPT THAT 1 CONNECTION OF 1 COOL WHAT 1 COULD NOT 1 COULD POP 1 COULD THEY 1 COULDN'T FIGURE 1 COUPLE OF 1 COURSE BY 1 COURSE TO 1 CRISES I'M 1 CRY WHICH 1 DAMN ABOUT 1 DAMN GREAT 1 DAMN IN 1 DAY I 1 DAY REALIZED 1 DECADE AGO 1 DECLARE DOOM 1 DEFINITION DOWN 1 DEFINITION RETURNED 1 DENIED AND 1 DID FIND 1 DID I 1 DID THEY 1 DIDN'T OCCUR 1 DIFFERENCE EQUATION 1 DIFFERENT BUT 1 DIFFERENT WAY 1 DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION 1 DISCOVERED TAKE 1 DISCRETE LOGS 1 DISPROVING THE 1 DISTRIBUTION OF 1 DO SOMETHING 1 DO THAT 1 DO WHAT 1 DO WITH 1 DO YOU 1 DOES THE 1 DOING GREAT 1 DOMINANCE OF 1 DON'T GET 1 DON'T GIVE 1 DON'T I 1 DON'T KNOW 1 DONE WITH 1 DONUT ABOUT 1 DOOM AND 1 DOWN THE 1 DOWN TO 1 DOWNER OF 1 DV^2 = 1 EARLIER AND 1 EARLY 2000 1 EASILY PROVEN 1 EIGHT YEARS 1 EITHER IT'S 1 ELSE HAPPENS 1 ELSE IT'S 1 ELSE SHOULD 1 ENCRYPTION BY 1 ENDED UP 1 EQUATION AND 1 EQUATION WHICH 1 EQUATIONS AND 1 EQUATIONS BUT 1 EQUATIONS COULD 1 EQUATIONS OF 1 EQUATIONS OR 1 EQUATIONS SO 1 EQUATIONS THAT 1 EQUATIONS TO 1 EQUATIONS WITH 1 EQUATIONS WITHOUT 1 EQUATIONS WOULD 1 ESTABLISHED MATHEMATICS 1 EVEN IF 1 EVEN MORE 1 EVEN THOUGH 1 EVERY TIME 1 EXCEPT FOR 1 EXCITED MUCH 1 EXPLAINED THE 1 EXPLICIT RESULT 1 F IT 1 FACTORED BY 1 FACTORING ANOTHER 1 FACTORING FOR 1 FACTORING I'D 1 FACTORING ONE 1 FACTORING SO 1 FACTORING SURROGATE 1 FACTORING WAS 1 FACTORIZATION OF 1 FAILING TO 1 FASCINATION OF 1 FAUX RESULTS 1 FEEL BETTER 1 FEELING I'D 1 FEELING OF 1 FELT THEY 1 FERMAT'S LAST 1 FIDDLED WITH 1 FIGURE OUT 1 FINALLY A 1 FINALLY I 1 FIND SOMETHING 1 FIND WHICH 1 FINDING A 1 FIRST CLEAR 1 FLEW JUST 1 FLT AND 1 FLT BUT 1 FLT HAD 1 FLT JUST 1 FLT WITH 1 FLT YEARS 1 FLYING FRACK 1 FOR ALL 1 FOR DEFINE 1 FOR GOOGLE 1 FOR HUMAN 1 FOR OVER 1 FOR TARGET 1 FOR THE 1 FOR USING 1 FORM U^2 1 FOUND I 1 FOUND THAT 1 FRACK AT 1 FREAKING PAGE 1 FREAKING RIEMANN 1 FUN 1 FUNCTION AS 1 FUNCTION I 1 FUNCTION THAT 1 FUNNY AS 1 GENERAL SOLUTION 1 GENERALIZED THE 1 GENERALLY SIMPLIFY 1 GENERALLY SOLVE 1 GET A 1 GET CERTAIN 1 GET EXCITED 1 GET WHERE 1 GIVES A 1 GIVES I 1 GIVES YOU 1 GLOOM EVERY 1 GO OVER 1 GOES TO 1 GOLDEN FEELING 1 GOOGLE I 1 GOOGLE SEARCHES 1 GOOGLE SOLVING 1 GOOGLE YUP 1 GOT MY 1 GREAT BUT 1 GREAT THEY 1 GROUND IN 1 GUY TRYING 1 HAD A 1 HAD AS 1 HAD FINALLY 1 HAD ONLY 1 HAD SOMETHING 1 HAD TECHNIQUES 1 HAD THE 1 HAD TRYING 1 HANDLE SOMETHING 1 HAPPENED THERE 1 HAPPENED TO 1 HAPPENED WAS 1 HAPPENS NOTHING 1 HARD NOT 1 HAS A 1 HAS T 1 HAS TO 1 HAVE LONG 1 HAVE THE 1 HAVING WATCHED 1 HEALTHY CRY 1 HER THINK 1 HEY TAUTOLOGICAL 1 HIM OR 1 HISTORICAL ODDITY 1 HORSE TO 1 HOW COULD 1 HOW DID 1 HOW DO 1 HOW TO 1 HUMAN BEINGS 1 HYPOTHESIS CLEARLY 1 HYPOTHESIS I 1 I ARGUED 1 I BELIEVED 1 I BRANCHED 1 I BROUGHT 1 I CALLED 1 I COULDN'T 1 I DO 1 I ENDED 1 I FOUND 1 I GET 1 I GOT 1 I HAVE 1 I INVENTED 1 I KNOW 1 I LONG 1 I LOOK 1 I PONDERED 1 I PREDICTED 1 I PROVED 1 I PUZZLE 1 I SAY 1 I SIMPLIFIED 1 I STARTED 1 I THINK 1 I THOUGHT 1 I TOOK 1 I'D ARGUED 1 I'D BROKEN 1 I'D DECLARE 1 I'D GONE 1 I'D HAD 1 I'D NAMED 1 I'D PROVEN 1 I'D REVERSED 1 I'D SIMPLIFIED 1 I'D TRIED 1 I'LL DO 1 I'VE GENERALIZED 1 I'VE SKIPPED 1 IDEA AND 1 IDEA OF 1 IDEA SEARCH 1 IDENTITIES AND 1 IF THEY 1 IGNORED OR 1 IGNORING FOR 1 IGNORING IT 1 IMPORTANT COULD 1 IMPRESSED WHEN 1 IMPROVING AND 1 IN 2002 1 IN ACTION 1 IN ACTUALITY 1 IN AN 1 IN ARGUMENTS 1 IN EARLY 1 IN SIMPLER 1 IN THAT 1 IN THE 1 INCREDIBLY POWERFUL 1 INSTEAD FACTORING 1 INSTEAD OF 1 INSULTS FLEW 1 INTELLECTUAL MYSTERIES 1 INTERESTING THING 1 INVENTED OR 1 IS AVAILABLE 1 IS BUT 1 IS IT 1 IS NO 1 IS SOLVED 1 IS WHICH 1 IT AS 1 IT BUT 1 IT EITHER 1 IT EXCEPT 1 IT GIVES 1 IT HAS 1 IT JUST 1 IT NOTHING 1 IT POSSIBLY 1 IT STILL 1 IT WOULD 1 IT'S A 1 IT'S ALMOST 1 IT'S ALSO 1 IT'S HARD 1 IT'S JUST 1 IT'S MORE 1 IT'S T 1 JUST A 1 JUST DIDN'T 1 JUST FINDING 1 JUST LIKE 1 JUST MADE 1 JUST PROVED 1 JUST PROVING 1 JUST SO 1 JUST THAT 1 KNOW I 1 KNOW WHY 1 K^M = 1 LAST THEOREM 1 LATER AS 1 LATER BE 1 LATER REALIZED 1 LEAD A 1 LEAST FOR 1 LEAST NOT 1 LESS A 1 LI X 1 LIKE A 1 LIKE GENERALLY 1 LIKE I 1 LIKE MOD 1 LIKE NOW 1 LIKE OK 1 LIKE TAKING 1 LIKE USUAL 1 LIKE X/LN 1 LIMITED SUCCESS 1 LITTLE SUCCESS 1 LOGS AND 1 LONG BELIEVED 1 LONG TIRED 1 LONG-TERM THE 1 LOOK AT 1 LOT MORE 1 MADE ME 1 MAKE HIM 1 MAKE THEM 1 MANAGED TO 1 MANY FAUX 1 MATHEMATICIANS HAVE 1 MATHEMATICIZE IT 1 MATHEMATICS OF 1 MATTER OF 1 MAY BE 1 ME ABOUT 1 ME BEFORE 1 ME FEEL 1 METHOD TO 1 MIGHT BE 1 MODULAR EQUATIONS 1 MORE AS 1 MORE BUT 1 MORE COMPLEX 1 MORE COMPLICATED 1 MORE FUN 1 MORE IMPRESSED 1 MORE OR 1 MORE SATISFYING 1 MOST PROFOUND 1 MOVERS THAT 1 MTH RESIDUE 1 MTH RESIDUES 1 MUCH ANY 1 MUCH OF 1 MUCH POSITIVE 1 MUCH WHY 1 MUDDLED IDEA 1 MY ATTENTION 1 MY FIRST 1 MY MORE 1 MY MTH 1 MY RESEARCH 1 MY TAUTOLOGICAL 1 MYSELF LIKE 1 MYSTERIES OF 1 N AND 1 N OK 1 NAMED THEM 1 NECESSITY FOR 1 NEGATIVE IT'S 1 NEW AND 1 NEW BABY 1 NEWSGROUP POSTERS 1 NEXT INTERESTING 1 NO NECESSITY 1 NO OR 1 NO THEY 1 NOT ARGUING 1 NOT AS 1 NOT BELIEVE 1 NOT SURE 1 NOT TO 1 NOTHING IMPORTANT 1 NOTHING IT'S 1 NOW AND 1 NOW AS 1 NOW BUT 1 NOW GONE 1 NOW IT'S 1 NOW TO 1 NOW WHICH 1 NOW WITH 1 NUMBER OF 1 NUMBER S 1 NUMBER T 1 NUMBER TO 1 NUMBERS LIKE 1 NUMBERS TO 1 OCCUR TO 1 ODDITY IN 1 OF ARGUING 1 OF CRISES 1 OF ESTABLISHED 1 OF FERMAT'S 1 OF FLT 1 OF FUNNY 1 OF GO 1 OF PRIME 1 OF S 1 OF SURROGATE 1 OF T 1 OF THAT 1 OF THEM 1 OF THINKING 1 OF TIME 1 OF WARMTH 1 OF WORLD 1 OF YEARS 1 OF YOUTH 1 OH SO 1 OK TRUTH 1 OLD GROUND 1 OLD NOW 1 OLDER NOW 1 ON ABOUT 1 ON AND 1 ON IMPROVING 1 ON ME 1 ON MY 1 ON SEARCHES 1 ON SURROGATE 1 ON THAT 1 ON THEM 1 ON THIS 1 ON USENET 1 ONE APPEARS 1 ONE NUMBER 1 ONE REALLY 1 ONLY USED 1 OR DENIED 1 OR DIFFERENT 1 OR DISCOVERED 1 OR DISPROVING 1 OR HER 1 OR IN 1 OR LESS 1 OR LIMITED 1 OR REVERSED 1 OTHER RESEARCH 1 OUT A 1 OUT AND 1 OUT THERE 1 OUT THIS 1 OVER A 1 OVER EIGHT 1 OVER FLT 1 OVER GOOGLE 1 OVER MY 1 OVER OLD 1 OVER THE 1 OVER THESE 1 OVER TOP 1 P EVEN 1 P SO 1 P TO 1 P X 1 PAGE ON 1 PAGE STILL 1 PART OF 1 PARTIAL DIFFERENCE 1 PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL 1 PASSION OF 1 PATH IS 1 PATH THAT 1 PATH TO 1 PATH WHICH 1 PEOPLE HAVE 1 PEOPLE TRASHING 1 PICK TAUTOLOGICAL 1 PONDERED THIS 1 POP OUT 1 POSSIBLY HAD 1 POSTERS CLAIMED 1 POWERFUL BUT 1 POWERFUL SO 1 PREDICTED THE 1 PRIME NUMBERS 1 PROBABLY LONG-TERM 1 PROBLEM AH 1 PROBLEM AND 1 PROBLEM FOR 1 PROBLEM SO 1 PROBLEM THERE 1 PROFOUND INTELLECTUAL 1 PROGRAMMED WITH 1 PROOF AND 1 PROOF BROUGHT 1 PROOF IN 1 PROOF OF 1 PROOF PUSHING 1 PROVE A 1 PROVE IT 1 PROVED A 1 PROVED FLT 1 PROVEN FLT 1 PROVEN THE 1 PROVEN TO 1 PROVING A 1 PROVING OR 1 PUSHING MY 1 PUZZLE OVER 1 Q MOD 1 RANDOM THING 1 REALLY COOL 1 REALLY GIVES 1 RECENTLY MY 1 RECENTLY WHEN 1 RECLAIM THE 1 RELIEF NOW 1 RESEARCH AND 1 RESEARCH SEEMED 1 RESEARCH WAS 1 RESIDUE RESULT 1 RESIDUES AS 1 RESIDUES BUT 1 RESIDUES IF 1 RESIDUES TO 1 RESULT BUT 1 RESULT IS 1 RESULT THAT 1 RESULT WITH 1 RESULTS AROUND 1 RESULTS AS 1 RESULTS ONE 1 RESULTS RELATED 1 RESULTS WITH 1 RETURNED TO 1 REVEALED BY 1 REVERSAL AND 1 REVERSED THE 1 RH AT 1 ROLLING DONUT 1 RSA ENCRYPTION 1 S THE 1 S THOUGH 1 S UNTIL 1 SATISFYING RESULTS 1 SAY HEY 1 SAY MAY 1 SAY SUPPOSEDLY 1 SAYING IT 1 SEARCH IN 1 SEARCH YOU'LL 1 SEARCHES AND 1 SEARCHES RELATED 1 SEEM SURROGATE 1 SEEMED TO 1 SHINY AND 1 SHOCKED AND 1 SHOULD BE 1 SHOULD CARE 1 SHOWING A 1 SHOWING HOW 1 SIMPLER OR 1 SIMPLER SO 1 SIMPLER WAYS 1 SIMPLIFIED AN 1 SIMPLIFIED YES 1 SIMPLIFY ALL 1 SKIPPED OVER 1 SO DAMN 1 SO HAPPENED 1 SO I'D 1 SO IF 1 SO NOW 1 SO POSTERS 1 SO WHAT 1 SO WHO 1 SO WITH 1 SO YOU 1 SOLID AND 1 SOLUTION TO 1 SOLUTIONS AND 1 SOLVE BINARY 1 SOLVE DISCRETE 1 SOLVE THE 1 SOLVED THAT 1 SOLVING BINARY 1 SOLVING QUADRATIC 1 SOLVING THE 1 SOME OK 1 SOME POSTERS 1 SOMETHING AS 1 SOMETHING LIKE 1 SOMETHING PEOPLE 1 SOMETHING SIMPLER 1 SORT OF 1 SPACES AGAINST 1 SPACES AND 1 SPACES FOR 1 SPACES THERE 1 SPACES THEY'RE 1 SPACES WERE 1 SPOT AT 1 SPOT FOR 1 SPOTS ON 1 SQUEALING WITH 1 STARTED DOWN 1 STILL AREAS 1 STILL COMES 1 STILL I'VE 1 STILL IS 1 STILL WORRY 1 STOOD FOR 1 STUFF THERE'S 1 STUPID IDEA 1 SUCCESS AGAINST 1 SUCCESS BUT 1 SUCCESS SO 1 SUCH A 1 SUPPOSEDLY AS 1 SUPPOSEDLY JUST 1 SURE IF 1 SURPRISE THAT 1 SWITCH TO 1 T BEFORE 1 T I 1 T INSTEAD 1 T MIGHT 1 T STOOD 1 TAKE OVER 1 TAKE YOUR 1 TAKING OVER 1 TARGET IT 1 TARGET NUMBER 1 TECHNIQUES WORSE 1 TECHNIQUES YES 1 THAT ALL 1 THAT BATTLE 1 THAT CAUGHT 1 THAT CONCEPT 1 THAT FACTORING 1 THAT FREAKING 1 THAT HAPPENED 1 THAT IDEA 1 THAT LEAD 1 THAT SEARCH 1 THAT SHOWING 1 THAT THEY 1 THAT TIME 1 THAT WEIRD 1 THAT WOULD 1 THAT'S BEEN 1 THAT'S IT 1 THE BEST 1 THE BIG 1 THE CASE 1 THE COLLAPSE 1 THE CONNECTION 1 THE DISTRIBUTION 1 THE DOMINANCE 1 THE EQUATIONS 1 THE FACTORIZATION 1 THE FORM 1 THE FREAKING 1 THE METHOD 1 THE MORE 1 THE MOST 1 THE NEXT 1 THE PASSION 1 THE PROBLEM 1 THE RESEARCH 1 THE RESULT 1 THE RESULTS 1 THE REVERSAL 1 THE RIEMANN 1 THE TARGET 1 THE THING 1 THEM AGAINST 1 THEM ALL 1 THEM AND 1 THEM CAN 1 THEM I'M 1 THEM INSULTS 1 THEM SAYING 1 THEM UP 1 THEM WITH 1 THEM YET 1 THEN A 1 THEN I'D 1 THEOREM SUPPOSEDLY 1 THERE AND 1 THERE IT'S 1 THERE'S NO 1 THESE MODULAR 1 THEY DON'T 1 THEY HOW 1 THEY OK 1 THEY SAY 1 THEY SHOULD 1 THEY WEREN'T 1 THEY'RE REALLY 1 THING AND 1 THING I 1 THING SO 1 THING THAT 1 THINGS AND 1 THINGS WHY 1 THINK AND 1 THINK IS 1 THINK THAT 1 THINK YOU'VE 1 THINKING TO 1 THIS EXPLICIT 1 THIS FASCINATION 1 THIS NEWSGROUP 1 THOUGH I'VE 1 THOUGH IT 1 THOUGHT TAUTOLOGICAL 1 THUS EXPLAINED 1 TIME I 1 TIME OH 1 TIME ONE 1 TIRED OF 1 TO #2 1 TO #3 1 TO ALLOW 1 TO COMPLEX 1 TO DO 1 TO FIND 1 TO GENERALLY 1 TO GIVE 1 TO HANDLE 1 TO HAVE 1 TO JUST 1 TO K^M 1 TO MATHEMATICIZE 1 TO ME 1 TO MOD 1 TO MTH 1 TO MYSELF 1 TO PROVING 1 TO RECLAIM 1 TO STILL 1 TO SWITCH 1 TO TRY 1 TO USE 1 TO WATER 1 TOOK OVER 1 TOP SPOTS 1 TRASHING THE 1 TRIED TO 1 TRUE FOR 1 TRUTH IS 1 TRY AND 1 TWO YEARS 1 UM YEAH 1 UNLEASHED THEM 1 UNTIL I 1 UNTIL THE 1 UP #1 1 UP AGAIN 1 UP IN 1 UP MY 1 US BACK 1 USE TAUTOLOGICAL 1 USED THEM 1 USENET PEOPLE 1 USING WHATEVER 1 USUAL HEY 1 U^2 + 1 VERY MUCH 1 WARMTH I 1 WAS A 1 WAS ABOUT 1 WAS ALSO 1 WAS ARGUING 1 WAS AVAILABLE 1 WAS DOING 1 WAS I 1 WAS IT 1 WAS JUST 1 WAS LIKE 1 WAS MY 1 WAS NOT 1 WAS ONE 1 WAS S 1 WAS SHOCKED 1 WAS SORT 1 WAS SUCH 1 WAS THAT 1 WAS THEN 1 WAS TO 1 WAS WHEN 1 WAS YEARS 1 WATCHED THE 1 WATER BUT 1 WAY TO 1 WAY UM 1 WAY WHICH 1 WAYS TO 1 WAYS YEAH 1 WEATHER ANY 1 WEIRD FEELING 1 WEIRD THING 1 WELL- WORKED 1 WELL-WORKED AREA 1 WENT TO 1 WERE ALREADY 1 WERE INCREDIBLY 1 WERE SO 1 WERE SOLID 1 WEREN'T BUDGING 1 WHAT CAN 1 WHAT GIVES 1 WHAT HAPPENED 1 WHAT I 1 WHAT I'D 1 WHAT IT'S 1 WHAT THEY 1 WHATEVER PATH 1 WHEN DEFINE 1 WHEN THE 1 WHERE I 1 WHERE OTHER 1 WHICH BRINGS 1 WHICH CAME 1 WHICH GOES 1 WHICH HAS 1 WHICH IS 1 WHICH MATHEMATICIANS 1 WHICH WOULD 1 WHILE UNTIL 1 WHO CARES 1 WHY ANYONE 1 WHY DOES 1 WHY OK 1 WHY WHY 1 WIKIPEDIA CAN'T 1 WIKIPEDIA MANAGED 1 WIN THAT 1 WITH A 1 WITH BINARY 1 WITH COMPUTERS 1 WITH IDENTITIES 1 WITH LITTLE 1 WITH MY 1 WITH NO 1 WITH THAT 1 WITH THEM 1 WITH THESE 1 WITH WHAT 1 WITHOUT SUCCESS 1 WORDS WHICH 1 WORKED AND 1 WORLD CIVILIZATION 1 WORLD LIKE 1 WORLD WEATHER 1 WORLD WITH 1 WORRIED ANY 1 WORRY SOME 1 WORSE I'D 1 WORSE TECHNIQUES 1 WORTHLESS AND 1 WOULD BE 1 WOULD LATER 1 WOULD LEAD 1 WOULD SEEM 1 X AND 1 X COULD 1 X Y 1 X/LN X 1 Y FUNCTION 1 YEAH BUT 1 YEAH SOLVING 1 YEARS EARLIER 1 YEARS FAILING 1 YEARS FELT 1 YEARS NO 1 YEARS OLD 1 YEARS OLDER 1 YEARS TRYING 1 YEARS WITH 1 YES BUT 1 YES EASILY 1 YET ON 1 YOU CAN'T 1 YOU DO 1 YOU KIND 1 YOU MAKE 1 YOU THINK 1 YOU TO 1 YOU'LL GET 1 YOU'VE PROVEN 1 YOUR PICK 1 YOUTH BEING 1 YUP HAS 1 YUP THAT 2 A DAMN 2 A PARTIAL 2 A POSITIVE 2 A WAY 2 ABOUT IT 2 ABOUT THEM 2 AGAINST THE 2 AND NOTHING 2 AND THAT 2 ANY MORE 2 AT LEAST 2 BACK IN 2 BELIEVE I 2 BUT THAT 2 COULD BE 2 COULD SOLVE 2 COUNTING FUNCTION 2 DEFINE MATHEMATICAL 2 DEFINITION OF 2 DID PROVE 2 FLT NOT 2 FOR A 2 GIVE A 2 GONE BEYOND 2 GOOGLE SEARCH 2 HAVE SUCCEEDED 2 HEY THAT'S 2 I WASN'T 2 I WORKED 2 I'M NOT 2 IF I'D 2 IF YOU 2 IN GOOGLE 2 IN IGNORING 2 IS ABOUT 2 IT FOR 2 JUST KIND 2 MATH BLOG 2 MATH PEOPLE 2 MOD N 2 MY DEFINITION 2 MY MATH 2 MY PRIME 2 NO ONE 2 NOT IN 2 NOT JUST 2 NOT SAYING 2 NOTHING ELSE 2 OF COURSE 2 OF MATHEMATICAL 2 OF MY 2 ONE DAY 2 PEOPLE ALREADY 2 POSTERS WERE 2 PRIME COUNTING 2 REALIZED I 2 RELATED TO 2 RESIDUES MOD 2 RESULT AND 2 RESULT AS 2 REVERSED EQUATIONS 2 RIEMANN HYPOTHESIS 2 RIPPING ON 2 SAYING I 2 SEARCH RESULTS 2 SEE THE 2 SO IT 2 SO MUCH 2 SOLVE QUADRATIC 2 SOMETHING I 2 SUCCEEDED IN 2 SURROGATE WHICH 2 THAT IS 2 THAT IT 2 THAT'S NOT 2 THE #1 2 THE DEFINITION 2 THE PATH 2 THE SURROGATE 2 THE WIKIPEDIA 2 THERE WAS 2 THESE THINGS 2 THOUGHT I 2 TO A 2 TO BINARY 2 TO PROVE 2 TO SEE 2 TO SOLVE 2 TO SOMETHING 2 TO THAT 2 WAS KIND 2 WASN'T AND 2 WERE RIPPING 2 WHICH JUST 2 WHICH LEAD 2 WITH IT 2 WITH THE 2 WORKED ON 2 YEARS AGO 2 YEARS NOW 3 AND I 3 AND IT 3 BE A 3 I BELIEVE 3 I COULD 3 I DON'T 3 IS A 3 IT IS 3 IT'S LIKE 3 MOD P 3 NEGATIVE AND 3 ONE OF 3 PROVE FLT 3 THAT WAS 3 THE WORLD 3 THEY WERE 3 TO THE 3 WHEN I 3 WHICH WAS 4 A NEGATIVE 4 AS I 4 FACTORING PROBLEM 4 FOR YEARS 4 I DID 4 I HAD 4 I WAS 4 LEAD TO 4 MATHEMATICAL PROOF 4 OF THE 4 POSITIVE RESULT 4 QUADRATIC RESIDUES 4 RESULT WHICH 4 THAT I 4 THAT RESULT 4 THE FACTORING 4 TRYING TO 5 OF A 5 OK SO 5 SO I 5 SURROGATE FACTORING 5 TO BE 6 KIND OF 6 TAUTOLOGICAL SPACES 7 BINARY QUADRATIC 7 DIOPHANTINE EQUATIONS 7 QUADRATIC DIOPHANTINE 8 IT WAS -o
From: Doug on 4 Jul 2010 01:29 "Owen Jacobson" <angrybaldguy(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:2010070400364912349-angrybaldguy(a)gmailcom... > On 2010-07-04 00:13:15 -0400, Owen Jacobson said: > >> On 2010-07-03 20:36:21 -0400, Doug said: >> >>> "JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:7078bb23-eec6-4fd3-82bf-9d86edb7db88(a)x2g2000prk.googlegroups.com... >>> >>> NPD Calculation (# of self referencing words/# of unique words. >>> Below 5% Normal >>> From 5 to 10% Narcissistic >>> from 10% to 15% Malignant narcissistic >>> above 15% call a Doctor or the police >>> >>> I, My, me, myself >>> >>> 66 + 12 + 3 + 1 = 82 >>> >>> 82/473 = 17.34% Extremely high !! >>> >>> *******Call your doctor or police, this is dangerous*****) >>> >>> >>> Unique words:473 Total words:1555 >>> Freq. Word >> *snip* >> >> The results for two-word constellations are somewhat interesting, I >> think. With the single-occurrence phrases omitted: >> >> Freq. Constellation >> >> 2 A DAMN >> 2 A PARTIAL >> 2 A POSITIVE >> 2 A WAY >> 2 ABOUT IT >> 2 ABOUT THEM >> 2 AGAINST THE >> 2 AND NOTHING >> 2 AND THAT >> 2 ANY MORE >> 2 AT LEAST >> 2 BACK IN >> 2 BELIEVE I >> 2 BUT THAT >> 2 COULD BE >> 2 COULD SOLVE >> 2 COUNTING FUNCTION >> 2 DEFINE MATHEMATICAL >> 2 DEFINITION OF <snip to shorten only> > 5 OK SO > 5 SO I > 5 SURROGATE FACTORING > 5 TO BE > 6 KIND OF > 6 TAUTOLOGICAL SPACES > 7 BINARY QUADRATIC > 7 DIOPHANTINE EQUATIONS > 7 QUADRATIC DIOPHANTINE > 8 IT WAS > > -o > Very Interesting, the two word thing. It is like a "double byte" of information that James has stored in his memory and comes out as a unit. Familiar phrases that he has validated to himself as should be true. Perhaps it is also limited to a number of syllables, perhaps 8. However he has a few phrases that he has munged or lengthened to try to show up on Google as they are more unique to him in current time, (although discussed/solved long ago but not in google history that much) , such as "binary quadratic Diophantine equations" I think one can list his common ones like below. Then his posts seem to only put meaningless or filler type of verbage around the phrases. However he is really pushing the "they" stuff, it is HUGE! Too bad. It shows he has decided not to work or trust other people, actually for YEARS and YEARS. (may be too general a statement, but it is late at night) SURROGATE FACTORING TAUTOLOGICAL SPACES BINARY QUADRATIC DIOPHANTINE EQUATIONS DEFINE MATHEMATICAL PROOF etc...
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: JSH: Results that are much more fun Next: Website devoted to differential equations |