From: za kAT on
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:46:39 GMT, Bear Bottoms wrote:

> Craig <netburgher(a)REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in news:hn7221$3o6$1(a)news.eternal-
> september.org:
>
>> On 03/09/2010 06:32 PM, Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>> Don't be so dramatic
>>
>> I like the title of your post.
>>
> Thank you.

Is this kind of behavior supposed to be encouraging people to contribute to
the newsgroup?

You're not 'earning the reputation others are giving you'. You earned that
years ago, all on your own, by subjecting us to the fallout from your
childish tantrums, and these pointless trolls.

Truth is, you are just another fucked up, self centred, tin drum player,
with a greatly over inflated opinion of your own self importance.

--
zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat
From: Tiger Would on
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:12:57 +0000, za kAT wrote:

> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:46:39 GMT, Bear Bottoms wrote:
>
>> Craig <netburgher(a)REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in news:hn7221$3o6$1(a)news.eternal-
>> september.org:
>>
>>> On 03/09/2010 06:32 PM, Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>>> Don't be so dramatic
>>>
>>> I like the title of your post.
>>>
>> Thank you.
>
> Is this kind of behavior supposed to be encouraging people to contribute to
> the newsgroup?
>
> You're not 'earning the reputation others are giving you'. You earned that
> years ago, all on your own, by subjecting us to the fallout from your
> childish tantrums, and these pointless trolls.
>
> Truth is, you are just another fucked up, self centred, tin drum player,
> with a greatly over inflated opinion of your own self importance.

Excuse me, BB is a self-admitted drug runner.

Now you may replay by snipping the above sentence whilst burying your
head in the sand and keeping on the best wishes of your Usenet
luv/freindshit buddies or you can ignore this post altogether
Stubbings Stoopey.

The clock ticks...
--
http://tr.im/1f9p
From: za kAT on
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:53:54 -0500, Tiger Would wrote:

> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:12:57 +0000, za kAT wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:46:39 GMT, Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>
>>> Craig <netburgher(a)REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in news:hn7221$3o6$1(a)news.eternal-
>>> september.org:
>>>
>>>> On 03/09/2010 06:32 PM, Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>>>> Don't be so dramatic
>>>>
>>>> I like the title of your post.
>>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>
>> Is this kind of behavior supposed to be encouraging people to contribute to
>> the newsgroup?
>>
>> You're not 'earning the reputation others are giving you'. You earned that
>> years ago, all on your own, by subjecting us to the fallout from your
>> childish tantrums, and these pointless trolls.
>>
>> Truth is, you are just another fucked up, self centred, tin drum player,
>> with a greatly over inflated opinion of your own self importance.
>
> Excuse me, BB is a self-admitted drug runner.
>

If I call myself the Marquis de Sade am I automatically the Marquis de
Sade?

That would be dead cool.


--
zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat
From: za kAT on
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:17:49 -0500, Tiger Would wrote:

> Gee, Stubby, you left my quote about BB. What happened to:
>
> "Let me spell it out.
>
> I have no intention of accusing a man of drug smuggling on the sole
> say so of you or anybody. Period."

Quoting your words, doesn't imply I agree with them. I cut out horseshit
unless the context would be lost.

Tangible evidence? Any?

Pooh the Cat watches by the window, Secret Squirrel handles the analysis,
and Foxy Woxy is muscle.

Nothing gets past team kAT, Ari.

I hold all the jellybeans.

> *so easy*

Yep.

--
zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat
From: Gordon Darling on
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:12:46 -0500, Codswallop Balderdash wrote:

> Tiger Would wrote:
>
> ( - )
>>
>>Excuse me, BB is a self-admitted drug runner.
>>
> ( - )
>
> I wish to (further) inform myself regarding BB. Is there some reasonably
> public reference regarding the drug offences?

<http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl(a)listserv.aol.com/msg24170.html>

<http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/727642/posts>

<http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl(a)listserv.aol.com/msg05031.html>

Among many other links.

Regards
Gordon





--
ox·y·mo·ron
n. pl. ox·y·mo·ra or ox·y·mo·rons
A rhetorical figure in which incongruous or contradictory terms are
combined, as in Microsoft Security, Microsoft Help and Microsoft Works.