SI Facescape
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Arte docu: Contacts
Next: Sigma/Foveon Questions
From: Paul Furman on 21 Apr 2010 21:40 Eric Stevens wrote: > On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:14:17 -0400, "Peter" > <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote: > >> "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote in message >> news:Vptyn.2136$Z6.1340(a)edtnps82... >>> "Peter Huebner" <no.one(a)this.address> wrote in message >>> news:MPG.2635287c26f0fd0d9899b5(a)news.individual.net... >>>> In article <D34yn.2014$Z6.1605(a)edtnps82>, dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca >>>> says... >>>>> Just wondering if the face has to be human? Or, are other forms of the >>>>> term >>>>> allowable? ie: animals, clocks, cliffs ... ? >>>>> >>>>> Take Care, >>>>> Dudley >>>> I believe when the topic was first posted it said 'close up, really >>>> close' and 'no pets/animals'. >>>> >>>> -P. >>> Thanks, I appreciate that clarification. I must have missed the initial >>> post, and I couldn't seem to find it on the site. >>> >>> Take Care, >>> Dudley >>> >>> >> I missed it too. Perhaps Bowser will clarify. > > I too would be grateful. I've already sent in a cat face. The shoot-in rulz are very strict and cannot ever be bent, even the littlest bit. EVER! :-)
From: Paul Furman on 21 Apr 2010 21:43
Paul Furman wrote: > Eric Stevens wrote: >> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:14:17 -0400, "Peter" >> <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote: >> >>> "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote in message >>> news:Vptyn.2136$Z6.1340(a)edtnps82... >>>> "Peter Huebner" <no.one(a)this.address> wrote in message >>>> news:MPG.2635287c26f0fd0d9899b5(a)news.individual.net... >>>>> In article <D34yn.2014$Z6.1605(a)edtnps82>, dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca >>>>> says... >>>>>> Just wondering if the face has to be human? Or, are other forms >>>>>> of the term >>>>>> allowable? ie: animals, clocks, cliffs ... ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Take Care, >>>>>> Dudley >>>>> I believe when the topic was first posted it said 'close up, really >>>>> close' and 'no pets/animals'. >>>>> >>>>> -P. >>>> Thanks, I appreciate that clarification. I must have missed the >>>> initial post, and I couldn't seem to find it on the site. >>>> >>>> Take Care, >>>> Dudley >>>> >>>> >>> I missed it too. Perhaps Bowser will clarify. >> >> I too would be grateful. I've already sent in a cat face. > > The shoot-in rulz are very strict and cannot ever be bent, even the > littlest bit. EVER! > > :-) And there are to be no 'creative' interpretations whatsoever! |