SI Facescape
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Arte docu: Contacts
Next: Sigma/Foveon Questions
From: Dudley Hanks on 16 Apr 2010 16:49 Just wondering if the face has to be human? Or, are other forms of the term allowable? ie: animals, clocks, cliffs ... ? Take Care, Dudley
From: tony cooper on 16 Apr 2010 19:25 On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:49:39 GMT, "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: >Just wondering if the face has to be human? Or, are other forms of the term >allowable? ie: animals, clocks, cliffs ... ? > If not, I'm resubmitting my soft-shelled turtle, but a head-on shot. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
From: Peter on 17 Apr 2010 16:09 "tony cooper" <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message news:mdshs51i2iunc4rlod3nq58k67ugvsr4ov(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:49:39 GMT, "Dudley Hanks" > <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: > >>Just wondering if the face has to be human? Or, are other forms of the >>term >>allowable? ie: animals, clocks, cliffs ... ? >> > > If not, I'm resubmitting my soft-shelled turtle, but a head-on shot. > If you violate the rulz, you won't win the Bentley. I probably have one non-human face to submit. -- Peter
From: Peter Huebner on 17 Apr 2010 21:33 In article <D34yn.2014$Z6.1605(a)edtnps82>, dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca says... > > Just wondering if the face has to be human? Or, are other forms of the term > allowable? ie: animals, clocks, cliffs ... ? > > Take Care, > Dudley I believe when the topic was first posted it said 'close up, really close' and 'no pets/animals'. -P.
From: Dudley Hanks on 17 Apr 2010 21:40
"Peter Huebner" <no.one(a)this.address> wrote in message news:MPG.2635287c26f0fd0d9899b5(a)news.individual.net... > In article <D34yn.2014$Z6.1605(a)edtnps82>, dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca > says... >> >> Just wondering if the face has to be human? Or, are other forms of the >> term >> allowable? ie: animals, clocks, cliffs ... ? >> >> Take Care, >> Dudley > > I believe when the topic was first posted it said 'close up, really > close' and 'no pets/animals'. > > -P. Thanks, I appreciate that clarification. I must have missed the initial post, and I couldn't seem to find it on the site. Take Care, Dudley |