From: dbvanhorn on
Is there someone on here who could share their experiences with a Bias
Power BPS-1 module?
They make some pretty impressive claims on their web site, "eliminates
EMI without external filtering", but I am skeptical.

From: Martin Riddle on


"dbvanhorn" <microbrix(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:af28ceae-65e6-484d-8703-07fbf08b9f87(a)r34g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> Is there someone on here who could share their experiences with a Bias
> Power BPS-1 module?
> They make some pretty impressive claims on their web site, "eliminates
> EMI without external filtering", but I am skeptical.
>

I believe if you get the CE certification document, it will show what
was required to pass the EMC tests.


Cheers


From: legg on
On Tue, 4 May 2010 08:10:06 -0700 (PDT), dbvanhorn
<microbrix(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>Is there someone on here who could share their experiences with a Bias
>Power BPS-1 module?
>They make some pretty impressive claims on their web site, "eliminates
>EMI without external filtering", but I am skeptical.

As with all supplies, you'll have to evaluate it in your application.

EMC claims of class B compliance are for the stand-alone unit, with no
indication of a ground wire connection. This will have to be accounted
for in most applications, where as a minimum, an output contact may be
unavoidable. In small power units, input to output capacitance may be
very low.

The claims for elimination of external filtering will apply to this
stand-alone circuit.

RL
From: krw on
On Tue, 04 May 2010 22:45:31 -0500, legg <legg(a)nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

>On Tue, 4 May 2010 08:10:06 -0700 (PDT), dbvanhorn
><microbrix(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Is there someone on here who could share their experiences with a Bias
>>Power BPS-1 module?
>>They make some pretty impressive claims on their web site, "eliminates
>>EMI without external filtering", but I am skeptical.
>
>As with all supplies, you'll have to evaluate it in your application.
>
>EMC claims of class B compliance are for the stand-alone unit, with no
>indication of a ground wire connection. This will have to be accounted
>for in most applications, where as a minimum, an output contact may be
>unavoidable. In small power units, input to output capacitance may be
>very low.
>
>The claims for elimination of external filtering will apply to this
>stand-alone circuit.
>
Not are the claims only good as a stand-alone unit, they're only applicable
for the configuration tested (often full load into a resistor). We had
serious problems with a wall wart that had alphabet soup ratings.

From: JB on

"dbvanhorn" <microbrix(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:af28ceae-65e6-484d-8703-07fbf08b9f87(a)r34g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> Is there someone on here who could share their experiences with a Bias
> Power BPS-1 module?
> They make some pretty impressive claims on their web site, "eliminates
> EMI without external filtering", but I am skeptical.

We use the BPS-2-14-00 and will be using the BPS-0.5-14-00 in some of our
designs. These BPS supplies require an external X2 100nF cap to meet the
EN55015 specs and even then they only just scrape a pass. However a new
design is currently in production as far as I'm aware which should improve
matters. I'll be testing the the BPS-0.5 in a new design soon. I'll report
back here if it's of interest.
regds.
JB