From: Massimo on 8 Jul 2010 07:43 On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 17:40:36 -0400, kony <spam(a)spam.com> wrote: >On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 13:15:34 GMT, bok118(a)zonnet.nl (Gerard >Bok) wrote: > >>On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:01:14 -0400, kony <spam(a)spam.com> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:48:43 GMT, bok118(a)zonnet.nl (Gerard >>>Bok) wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 08:49:03 -0400, Paul <nospam(a)needed.com> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>Gerard Bok wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:42:48 -0500, "Tiziano" >>>>>> <nospam(a)example.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I have this 11-year old PC and I am thinking about upgrading it by >>>>>>> installing an SSD (SATA). >> >>Bad quote ;-) >>I do have 11 year old PC's around but it wasn't my idea to >>'upgrade' them, using SSD ;-) >> >>>>Maybe buy a CompactFlash to IDE converter ? >>> >>>Just for testing or for use? For regular use it would be >>>much slower than an SSD. >> >>On second thought that wasn't such a smart advice indeed :-) >>Not with speed in mind, that is. >>There are CF cards marked '133' out there, but that doesn't mean >>133 MBps (rather: 133 times floppy speed.) Sorry. > > >There is a sale right now on a 32GB OCZ Onyx for $60 after >rebate, at that price point I might change my mind about >upgrading an aging PC with an SSD... though of course it is >slower than many but still leaps better than the jmicron >controller based SSDs of a couple years ago. > >Problem is, older PCs probably aren't running Win7 and older >OS don't have TRIM support so the performance will degrade >once all blocks have had data written to them... though it >may still easily be faster than the old HDD it replaces or a >new HDD. > >http://www.mwave.com/mwave/SKUSearch_v3.asp?px=HP&scriteria=BA37393 But there are ssd's that do not need trim command because they have their own garbage collection inbuilt. Massimo
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Password protected laptop HDDs? Next: Supermicro C2SEA problems with Windows 7 |