Sagnac Idiocy
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: USM
Next: The real twin paradox.
From: Dr. Henri Wilson on 25 Oct 2007 20:41 On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:31:13 GMT, "Androcles" <Engineer(a)hogwarts.physics> wrote: > >"Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message >news:qphvh3t9srkihdl1pps5ses29sj3ndffla(a)4ax.com... >: On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:28:59 GMT, "Androcles" <Engineer(a)hogwarts.physics> >: wrote: >: >: > >: >"Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message >: >news:tgcvh3tegj6m80dhv0998ml89cak893t0t(a)4ax.com... >: >: On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:32:36 GMT, "Androcles" ><Engineer(a)hogwarts.physics> >: >: wrote: >: >: >: >Androcles' third law: >: >: > For every photon there is an equal and opposite rephoton. >: >: >(They just happen to be coloured magenta and yellow so that >: >: >you can see them.) They are very much like waves, but have >: >: >direction. That's because atoms or molecules have two electrons. >: >: >It all comes down to wave superposition, photons have two sources, >: >: >not one, and momentum must be conserved. >: >: >: >: ..atoms or molecules have two electrons......??????????????? >: > >: >Two or more, yes. You have difficulty counting, of course. >: >: What about H? > >You've never seen a photon from a single hydrogen atom and never will. >This is from a molecule, H2. > http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/modpic/hydtube.jpg > > You have difficulty counting and with basic chemistry as well as >basics physics, of course. Hydrogen has ONE electron, dummy pommie engineer. Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
From: Paul B. Andersen on 26 Oct 2007 03:13 Dr. Henri Wilson wrote: > On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:28:44 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" > <paul.b.andersen(a)hiadeletethis.no> wrote: > >> Dr. Henri Wilson wrote: >>> BaTh says that the rays move at c wrt the moving source from the (static) >>> emission point. They move at c+v and c-v (wrt the no-rotating frame) around the >>> ring. BaTh says the travel times are the same and elements emitted >>> simultaneously arrive at the detector simltaneously. >> And since the "elemens" of a ray which travel with the phase velocity c+/-v >> are planes of equal phase, the phases blatantly obviously have to >> be equal if they meet _simultaneously_ at the detector. > > Sorry Paul, unlike your 'moving squiggles' BaTh the front of a BaTh photon > oscillates once every absolute wavelength traveled. I suppose 'oscillating' means that some entity is varying cyclically. Lets call that entity 'phi' (or anything else you might suggest). Would you please express what you stated above mathematically? phi(x,t) = ? Too hard for you? :-) -- Paul http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/
From: Dr. Henri Wilson on 26 Oct 2007 07:17
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 09:13:58 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen(a)hiadeletethis.no> wrote: >Dr. Henri Wilson wrote: >> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:28:44 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" >> <paul.b.andersen(a)hiadeletethis.no> wrote: >> >>> Dr. Henri Wilson wrote: >>>> BaTh says that the rays move at c wrt the moving source from the (static) >>>> emission point. They move at c+v and c-v (wrt the no-rotating frame) around the >>>> ring. BaTh says the travel times are the same and elements emitted >>>> simultaneously arrive at the detector simltaneously. >>> And since the "elemens" of a ray which travel with the phase velocity c+/-v >>> are planes of equal phase, the phases blatantly obviously have to >>> be equal if they meet _simultaneously_ at the detector. >> >> Sorry Paul, unlike your 'moving squiggles' BaTh the front of a BaTh photon >> oscillates once every absolute wavelength traveled. > >I suppose 'oscillating' means that some entity is varying cyclically. >Lets call that entity 'phi' (or anything else you might suggest). >Would you please express what you stated above mathematically? >phi(x,t) = ? > >Too hard for you? :-) See my reply to George where I define photon wavelength.. Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm |