Sagnac Idiocy
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: USM
Next: The real twin paradox.
From: Dr. Henri Wilson on 20 Oct 2007 22:25 On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 00:43:14 GMT, "Androcles" <Engineer(a)hogwarts.physics> wrote: > >"Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message >news:p94lh35gnm6gbmbku1eb7d47eh6i9k3atg(a)4ax.com... >: On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 14:15:13 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" >: <paul.b.andersen(a)guesswhathia.no> wrote: >: >: >Quite. >: >That is because the Sagnac experiment falsifies the emission theory. >: >And it's no invention of George's or mine. >: >It's how it is. >: >: The sagnac effect is now fully explained by BaTh. Accept it Paul.... > > >I've yet to see it. BaTh has no Doppler. Idiot....I've even see you write the equation.... >: The emission point (in the non-rotating frame) of a particular photon it >: emitted some time ago could indeed be now in Australia. > >It could. The other end of the line is moving, the line stretches. > >: But Norwegians are not smart enough to realise that they are now where >Alaska >: was 13 hours ago. > >But Ozzie morons are not smart enough to realise that the other end of the >line >is moving at c+v. In futue, I am plonkng you after 10pm your time. Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
From: Androcles on 21 Oct 2007 05:25 "Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message news:12elh3l320lhrk3plgk6eu5p7h0oab2t34(a)4ax.com... : On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 00:43:14 GMT, "Androcles" <Engineer(a)hogwarts.physics> : wrote: : : > : >"Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message : >news:p94lh35gnm6gbmbku1eb7d47eh6i9k3atg(a)4ax.com... : >: On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 14:15:13 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" : >: <paul.b.andersen(a)guesswhathia.no> wrote: : >: : : >: >Quite. : >: >That is because the Sagnac experiment falsifies the emission theory. : >: >And it's no invention of George's or mine. : >: >It's how it is. : >: : >: The sagnac effect is now fully explained by BaTh. Accept it Paul.... : > : > : >I've yet to see it. BaTh has no Doppler. : : Idiot....I've even see you write the equation.... Emission Fact uses Doppler, BaTh does not. Like Dishman and Tusseladd, you know nothing about physics. I'm not fooled by clockwork, you are. This set of wheels all have the same frequency: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/inphase.gif This set do not: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/nophase.gif Explain that, sheep shagger, an engineer could. : : >: The emission point (in the non-rotating frame) of a particular photon it : >: emitted some time ago could indeed be now in Australia. : > : >It could. The other end of the line is moving, the line stretches. : > : >: But Norwegians are not smart enough to realise that they are now where : >Alaska : >: was 13 hours ago. : > : >But Ozzie morons are not smart enough to realise that the other end of the : >line : >is moving at c+v. : : In futue, I am plonkng you after 10pm your time. Like Dishman and Tusseladd, you know nothing about physics. I'm not fooled by clockwork, you are. This set of wheels all have the same frequency: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/inphase.gif This set do not: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/nophase.gif Explain that, sheep shagger, an engineer could.
From: Paul B. Andersen on 21 Oct 2007 07:49 Dr. Henri Wilson skrev: > On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 14:15:13 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" > <paul.b.andersen(a)guesswhathia.no> wrote: >> BTW, Henri. >> I found someone who supports you. >> http://www.wbabin.net/physics/faraj6.htm > > there are plenty who support me. I emailed this guy some weeks ago telling him > the simple facts.... Did those 'simple facts' include his glaring error? You know - he did arrive at the conclusion that the emission theory predicts that the time difference is Dt = 4wA / c^2 And you don't agree, do you? So what did he do wrong? Paul
From: Dr. Henri Wilson on 21 Oct 2007 18:14 On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:49:19 +0100, "George Dishman" <george(a)briar.demon.co.uk> wrote: > >"Clueless Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message >news:2o3lh3lgmqqnh0lk5p97vq409u91net1uv(a)4ax.com... >> On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 11:31:20 +0100, "George Dishman" >> <george(a)briar.demon.co.uk> wrote: >>>"Clueless Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message >>>news:s09ih3lvq4tg7t77qqp43ncr3n55p63o6r(a)4ax.com... >> You still cannot see that the emision point moves backwards around the >> ring in >> the rotating frame. There is really no point in trying to educate someone >> who >> has a completely closed mind. > >There is no point in talking to a high school >dropout whoc lies about having a degree because >he cannot live with reality. > >The proof that Sagnac falsifies ballistic theory >was in the inertial frame as to can plainly see >in the quoted figure and algebra, Jerry's animation >correctly shows the motion of the waves emitted and >moves them at the correct speed while you cannot >even show the waves moving, without proving yourself >wrong. Jerry has shown that you can't make a ring gyro using sound in air if you remove all the air. >>> >>>No it doesn't, the source is in the table. >> >> the emission point of a photon moves backwards around the ring. > >Move the waves at speed c+v from your emission >point then and see what happens. That's what >Jerry's applet does. Your animation is a fraud, >you deliberately don't move the waves because >it would prove you wrong. jerry has not modelled a ring gyro. My theory and animation is fully backed by experiment. >> Why don't you admit defeat George? > >Because you have already admitted defeat by >publishing a deliberately fraudulent animation >in which the waves don't move. It just shows >the lengths you will go to to support your >denial, but it is a waste of time, Jerry's >applet shows ballistic theory correctly. George, the source emits photons, not squiggly lines. >George > Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
From: Dr. Henri Wilson on 21 Oct 2007 18:15
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 09:25:46 GMT, "Androcles" <Engineer(a)hogwarts.physics> wrote: > >"Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message >news:12elh3l320lhrk3plgk6eu5p7h0oab2t34(a)4ax.com... >: On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 00:43:14 GMT, "Androcles" <Engineer(a)hogwarts.physics> >: wrote: >: >: > >: >"Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message >: >news:p94lh35gnm6gbmbku1eb7d47eh6i9k3atg(a)4ax.com... >: >: On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 14:15:13 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" >: >: <paul.b.andersen(a)guesswhathia.no> wrote: >: >: >: >: >: >Quite. >: >: >That is because the Sagnac experiment falsifies the emission theory. >: >: >And it's no invention of George's or mine. >: >: >It's how it is. >: >: >: >: The sagnac effect is now fully explained by BaTh. Accept it Paul.... >: > >: > >: >I've yet to see it. BaTh has no Doppler. >: >: Idiot....I've even see you write the equation.... > >Emission Fact uses Doppler, BaTh does not. >Like Dishman and Tusseladd, you know nothing about physics. >I'm not fooled by clockwork, you are. >This set of wheels all have the same frequency: > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/inphase.gif >This set do not: > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/nophase.gif > Explain that, sheep shagger, an engineer could. > > >: >: >: The emission point (in the non-rotating frame) of a particular photon >it >: >: emitted some time ago could indeed be now in Australia. >: > >: >It could. The other end of the line is moving, the line stretches. >: > >: >: But Norwegians are not smart enough to realise that they are now where >: >Alaska >: >: was 13 hours ago. >: > >: >But Ozzie morons are not smart enough to realise that the other end of >the >: >line >: >is moving at c+v. >: >: In futue, I am plonkng you after 10pm your time. > >Like Dishman and Tusseladd, you know nothing about physics. >I'm not fooled by clockwork, you are. >This set of wheels all have the same frequency: > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/inphase.gif >This set do not: > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/nophase.gif > Explain that, sheep shagger, an engineer could. Put the bottle away. It's bed time..... Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm |