Prev: Insect-like Chinamen invade photo group (Rich's racism)
Next: Camera RAW for Olympus E-PL1 on Mac OS X (10.6.3)
From: mmyvusenet on 9 May 2010 01:30 "Ofnuts" <o.f.n.u.t.s(a)la.poste.net> escribi� en el mensaje de noticias:4bdfbb59$0$24821$426a74cc(a)news.free.fr... > On 04/05/2010 03:16, John McWilliams wrote: >> Fred McKenzie wrote: >>> In article <hrl7h8$379$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, >>> John McWilliams <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> wrote: >>> >>>> mmyvusenet wrote: >>>>> Hello: >>>>> >>>>> I also took these photos: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4571305649/ >>>>> >>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4571344947/ >>>>> >>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4572052188/ >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for your technical comments about photography. >>>> I looked at the last one: Never show a vessel other than level at a >>>> dock, unless she is severely so and that's the story. >>> >>> In this case, tilting the camera for a horizontal railing would have >>> resulted in very tilted masts. Perhaps this was the best compromise >>> possible. >> >> The masts are raked slightly aft, anyway, and anything that's on water >> better be level- or be at sea. >> >> In other words, I disagree with your agreeable statement. > > The crane/mast in the background(*) on the right tilts on the other side, > so this could just be a matter of perspective. > > (*)Miguel, when will we get larger pictures? > > -- > Bertrand Thank you all for your answers. Bertrand, I'm seeing the possibility of larger post photos on my blog, I'll be commenting on, thanks. -- MMYV http://www.mmyv.com |