Prev: [Samba] (no subject)
Next: shadow_copy2 prob? FSCTL..GET..DATA: max_data_count(114) too small (118) bytes needed!
From: Linda Walsh on 6 Feb 2010 06:40 I have "/home" as a logical volume. I have snapshots: LV VG Attr LSize Origin Snap% Move Log Copy% Convert 2010.02.05-01.26.19 Home swi-ao 10.00G lvol0 39.81 2010.02.06-02.37.52 Home swi-ao 5.00G lvol0 0.25 lvol0 Home owi-ao 1.00T and they are mounted: /dev/mapper/Home-2010.02.05--01.26.19 on /home/snapdir/@GMT-2010.02.05-01.26.19 type xfs (ro,nouuid) /dev/mapper/Home-2010.02.06--02.37.52 on /home/snapdir/@GMT-2010.02.06-02.37.52 type xfs (ro,nouuid) My 'home's definitions (I have 3 shares that all resided on /home partition': 'ServHome' (home of user on the server) 'home' (share of the root of the share) and '/homes' (the per-user in Domain share) where their profiles go Each has: vfs objects = recycle readahead shadow_copy2 recycle: keeptree=true shadow:snapdir = /home/snapdir shadow:basedir = /home 01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789 Yet when I go look at files that that have been modified on the 6th, I see no previous versions. In /var/log/samba/clientname.log, I see: linw opened file mail/bind read=Yes write=No (numopen=3) [2010/02/06 03:23:41, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:1970(call_nt_transact_ioctl) FSCTL_GET_SHADOW_COPY_DATA: max_data_count(114) too small (118) bytes needed! [2010/02/06 03:23:57, 2] smbd/close.c:612(close_normal_file) linw closed file mail/bind (numopen=2) NT_STATUS_OK Is the max data count too small the problem? Is there a bug in this version of samba? Is this relevant? Or is there something else wrong I don't see? linux 2.6.27.29 on suse 11.1 samba 3.4.3-12.1 Any insight appreciated.... Thanks, Linda -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |