shadow_copy2 prob? FSCTL..GET..DATA: max_data_count(114) too small (118) bytes needed!
in [Samba]
|
Prev: [Samba] shadow_copy2 prob? FSCTL..GET..DATA: max_data_count(114) too small (118) bytes needed!
Next: [Samba] Samba 4: LookupAccountName fails
From: Volker Lendecke on 6 Feb 2010 07:00 On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 03:37:28AM -0800, Linda Walsh wrote: > linw opened file mail/bind read=Yes write=No (numopen=3) > [2010/02/06 03:23:41, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:1970(call_nt_transact_ioctl) > FSCTL_GET_SHADOW_COPY_DATA: max_data_count(114) too small (118) bytes > needed! > [2010/02/06 03:23:57, 2] smbd/close.c:612(close_normal_file) > linw closed file mail/bind (numopen=2) NT_STATUS_OK > > Is the max data count too small the problem? Is there a bug in this > version of samba? Is this relevant? > > Or is there something else wrong I don't see? > > linux 2.6.27.29 on suse 11.1 > samba 3.4.3-12.1 Looks like samba bug 6850, fixed in 3.4.4. Volker -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: Linda Walsh on 6 Feb 2010 09:00
Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 03:37:28AM -0800, Linda Walsh wrote: >> linw opened file mail/bind read=Yes write=No (numopen=3) >> [2010/02/06 03:23:41, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:1970(call_nt_transact_ioctl) >> FSCTL_GET_SHADOW_COPY_DATA: max_data_count(114) too small (118) bytes >> needed! >> [2010/02/06 03:23:57, 2] smbd/close.c:612(close_normal_file) >> linw closed file mail/bind (numopen=2) NT_STATUS_OK >> >> Is the max data count too small the problem? Is there a bug in this >> version of samba? Is this relevant? >> >> Or is there something else wrong I don't see? >> >> linux 2.6.27.29 on suse 11.1 >> samba 3.4.3-12.1 > > Looks like samba bug 6850, fixed in 3.4.4. > > Volker ---- Bingo! Thanks! We got previous versions! Yeay! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |