Scientific American and Science censorship...
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Definitely Demolition - Proven FACT, 9/11 could not possibly have been other than an inside job.
Next: [Guardian] 'Climategate' debate: less meltdown, more well-mannered argument
From: Androcles on 2 Aug 2010 04:25 "Szczepan Bialek" <sz.bialek(a)wp.pl> wrote in message news:4c56769e$0$2597$65785112(a)news.neostrada.pl... | | "Androcles" <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote | news:gqu5o.20360$bo3.6733(a)hurricane... | > | > "Szczepan Bialek" <sz.bialek(a)wp.pl> wrote in message | > news:4c566e0e$0$19176$65785112(a)news.neostrada.pl... | > | | > | "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote | > | news:e903f906-4035-4184-9eea-09972eecd819(a)v6g2000prd.googlegroups.com... | > | On Jul 29, 3:44 pm, franklinhu <frankli...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:> | > | > | > | >> Szczepan is making an arugment that the aether is made out of | > | > interstellar dust. | > | | > | Interstelar medium is "made of" plasma (ions, electrons) and dust. | > | | > | >>Now, getting to the point of what we want an aether | > | > to do for us, I think it is of utmost importance that the aether be | > | > the medium for transmitting light. I would doubt that the interstellar | > | > medium would be sufficient to account for transmission of light. The | > | > density of that interstellar medium is extremely low. Given the speed | > | > of light and how higher density materials transmit waves faster, I | > | > would expect the aether to be extremely dense. Neither could waves | > | > propagate well in medium with so few particles to transmit the wave | > | > by. | > | | > | >This is cretinose. The wavespeed for woom (sound) is swifter for | > | thicker media but not the wavespeed for liht. See Snell and Maxwell's | > | equations. | > | | > | Equations are for students. | > | | > | Scientist should measure. | > | | > | The result are: In the wire the electric waves travel with the speed of | > | light | > | > Bullshit, they are much slower, even in coax. | | In a bare wire was measured by Hertz and many others. In dielectric is a | little slower. | The coax is not a wire and not an insulator. | | Sound also travel in a coax. | | Do you agree that in the same medium travel different waves? I'll never agree with any of your blatant stupidity and ignorance. What medium does this wave travel in? http://paws.kettering.edu/~drussell/Demos/SHO/damp.html
From: ben6993 on 2 Aug 2010 07:00 On Aug 1, 1:45 pm, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > On Jul 31, 11:47 pm, Benj <bjac...(a)iwaynet.net> wrote: > > > On Jul 31, 2:28 pm, "FrediFizzx" <fredifi...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > "maxwell" <s...(a)shaw.ca> wrote in message > > > > led to the standard view that "QM is the final form of micro physical > > > > theory". I, for one, don't think so. > > > > You are forgetting the Pauli Exclusion Principle. Chemistry made > > > perfect sense after that. > > > In my considerable experience, FreddiFizzle, Chemistry never makes > > "perfect sense". Where is Uncle Al when you need him? > > why not? "Where is Uncle Al when you need him?" Uncle Al quit this ng on 24 June. See research pages.
From: Szczepan Bialek on 2 Aug 2010 14:52 "Androcles" <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote news:6iv5o.68568$zo4.35337(a)hurricane... > > "Szczepan Bialek" <sz.bialek(a)wp.pl> wrote in message > news:4c56769e$0$2597$65785112(a)news.neostrada.pl... > | > | > | Do you agree that in the same medium travel different waves? > > I'll never agree with any of your blatant stupidity and ignorance. > What medium does this wave travel in? > http://paws.kettering.edu/~drussell/Demos/SHO/damp.html There are dipoles. You must place them in a medium to have a wave. Air, water, solid or plasma. S*
From: jimp on 2 Aug 2010 15:05 In sci.physics.electromag Szczepan Bialek <sz.bialek(a)wp.pl> wrote: > There are dipoles. > You must place them in a medium to have a wave. > Air, water, solid or plasma. > S* Babbling nonsense. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply.
From: Szczepan Bialek on 3 Aug 2010 13:08
"PD" <thedraperfamily(a)gmail.com> wrote news:955894d1-d6b5-4551-ae2a-cc9532695e5c(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... On Aug 3, 2:04 am, "Szczepan Bialek" <sz.bia...(a)wp.pl> wrote: > >> > http://paws.kettering.edu/~drussell/Demos/SHO/damp.html > >> "Webster's dictionary defines a wave as "a disturbance or variation that > transfers energy progressively from point to point in a medium and that > may > take the form of an elastic deformation or of a variation of pressure, > electric or magnetic intensity, electric potential, or temperature." >And that is a poor definition. Completely inaccurate in fact. You may take it up with the publishers of Webster's. >In physics, a wave is a phenomenon that occurs in a physical system that carries energy and momentum from one place to another. This phenomenon is exhibited in any system wherein relevant laws of physics governing the system take a particular mathematical form called the "wave equation," so called because the solutions to the equation are waves. In some systems, a medium is present and the relevant laws of physics pertain to the medium. In other systems, a medium is not present. You are in school physics. In real physics are solitons: http://paws.kettering.edu/~drussell/Demos/Solitons/solitons.html For them is also the proper math. But it is enough to know that "a disturbance or variation that transfers energy progressively from point to point " ends when the source stop working. So each disturbance is not simetrical soliton. It is known also from Stokes. >> No medium no waves. >> So the "vacuum" is not empty. There are plasma and dust. Do you agree? S* |