Prev: Calculation of Soldner
Next: LWalk, do you see why Iain Davidson has a error filled fake proof? #4.15 Correcting Math
From: Androcles on 26 Jul 2010 09:43

"Szczepan Bia3ek" <sz.bialek(a)wp.pl> wrote in message
news:4c4d5227$0$17082$65785112(a)news.neostrada.pl...
|
| "Vince Morgan" <vinhar(a)TAKEOUToptusnet.com.au> wrote
| news:4c4ccee4$0$25356$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au...
| >
| > "Szczepan Bialek" <sz.bialek(a)wp.pl> wrote in message
| > news:4c4c7619$0$17085$65785112(a)news.neostrada.pl...
| >>
| >>
| >> But what is your opinion on the evidences collected by A.G. Kelly:
| >>
| >
http://www.worldnpa.org/pdf/ebooks/Kelly%20-%20New%20Theory%20of%20the%20Behavior%20of%20Light.pdf
| >>
| >> All todays measurements are in agreement with the Stokes aether where
the
| >> plasma rotate locally with the Sun.
| >>
| > Interesting paper Szczepan. I don't quite get "light moves with the
| > earth's
| > gravitational field" yet,
|
| Me too. But the collection is universal.
| The same evidences means quite oppsite for Andro than for Kelly.
| Who is right?

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/geoopt/optpic/brokpen.jpg

Kelly: The pencil bends when you put it water.
Androcles: The light is refracted.

The same evidence means quite opposite for Androcles than for Kelly.
Who is right?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7T0d7o8X2-E part 2.

Kelly: The light is affected by gravity.
Androcles:
Don't know.
(1) maybe the apparatus is bent by gravity. Attach weights to bend it more.
(2) maybe the air is denser in the lower part of the apparatus, refracting
the light. Perform in vacuum.

Maybe gravity affects light. Where are the Moon and Sun (tides) when the
shifts are at maximum
and minimum?






From: Vince Morgan on 26 Jul 2010 20:37

"Szczepan Bia�ek" <sz.bialek(a)wp.pl> wrote in message
news:4c4d5227$0$17082$65785112(a)news.neostrada.pl...
>
> "Vince Morgan" <vinhar(a)TAKEOUToptusnet.com.au> wrote
> news:4c4ccee4$0$25356$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au...
> >
> > "Szczepan Bialek" <sz.bialek(a)wp.pl> wrote in message
> > news:4c4c7619$0$17085$65785112(a)news.neostrada.pl...
> >>
> >>
> >> But what is your opinion on the evidences collected by A.G. Kelly:
> >>
> >
http://www.worldnpa.org/pdf/ebooks/Kelly%20-%20New%20Theory%20of%20the%20Behavior%20of%20Light.pdf
> >>
> >> All todays measurements are in agreement with the Stokes aether where
the
> >> plasma rotate locally with the Sun.
> >>
> > Interesting paper Szczepan. I don't quite get "light moves with the
> > earth's
> > gravitational field" yet,
>
> Me too. But the collection is universal.
> The same evidences means quite oppsite for Andro than for Kelly.
> Who is right?
>
> >but it's certainly very interesting. I did read
> > the later paper where he did rotate the solenoid and that was very
> > informative as well.
>
> Is it avilable on line?

I don't know Szczepan. An ascociate sent a copy to me with regard to
homopolar generators some time ago. If you give me an email address to send
it to you are welcome to a copy.
It's only 120 KB.

> S*
>
>


From: Autymn D. C. on 1 Aug 2010 08:08
On Jul 25, 5:53 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote:
> Misleading rather than informative. For example, the four mirror Sagnac
> diagram is really like this:
>  http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Sagnac/Sagnac.gif
> To claim one ray arrives before the other is abject nonsense.
> A meets B before B meets A is lunacy.

behind then?

> One ray travels faster than the other but travels a greater distance:
>  http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Sagnac/Sagnac1.GIF

Rays are free, not fast, and they fare, not travel.
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Calculation of Soldner
Next: LWalk, do you see why Iain Davidson has a error filled fake proof? #4.15 Correcting Math