From: Leonard Blaisdell on
In article <dorayme-816DA2.13542827062010(a)news.albasani.net>,
dorayme <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote:

> I am telling you all - bow down before me goddamit! - rolling
> your own, respecting Ockham and Jesus, the wonderfully simple
> built in Mac screen capture facility, never mind java, schmava,
> applets, schmapplets is best and most flexible. The pic in the
> above URL was made with normal Mac Command Shift 4 and a simple
> transparent backed arrow image dropped and dragged over where i
> wanted it.

I simply can't agree. The arrow is not touching the blue area but is
touching where you wanted it. It has to be in the blue area. Otherwise
it's nonfunctional and misleading decoration. Wouldn't you agree?
Otherwise, your point stands and the arrow is breathtakingly beautiful.

leo
From: dorayme on
In article
<leoblaisdell-C36651.22240326062010(a)News.Individual.NET>,
Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> In article <dorayme-816DA2.13542827062010(a)news.albasani.net>,
> dorayme <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>
> > I am telling you all - bow down before me goddamit! - rolling
> > your own, respecting Ockham and Jesus, the wonderfully simple
> > built in Mac screen capture facility, (never mind java, schmava,
> > applets, schmapplets), is best and most flexible. The pic in the
> > above URL was made with normal Mac Command Shift 4 and a simple
> > transparent backed arrow image dropped and dragged over where I
> > wanted it.
>
> I simply can't agree.

> The arrow is not touching the blue area but is
> touching where you wanted it. It has to be in the blue area. Otherwise
> it's nonfunctional and misleading decoration. Wouldn't you agree?
> Otherwise, your point stands and the arrow is breathtakingly beautiful.
>

The point is that the point, of the arrow that is, can be moved
up, along with the rest of the arrow.

Talking about the point of arrows, ever seen an arrow lose its
point? It is the saddest thing imaginable. It is sad enough for a
human life to lose any point but with an arrow the pain is
sharpened by orders of magnitude. Humans can go on in
pointlessness. They do. But arrows? No, the point of an arrow
*is* its whole point.

I run a small clinic for lost and broken arrows and I know. I
have personally talked to some of the saddest cases when I do my
rounds. It is almost impossible to convince one that has lost its
point that there is a point to going on existing. So necessary is
a point to an arrow that we will transplant points that have lost
their arrows from a bank of them that we have established. About
this latter, btw, it is supported by donations. If I have touched
your hearts, if you care at all, please send donations, $US10
upwards care of me.

--
dorayme
From: Leonard Blaisdell on
In article <dorayme-33184F.16415227062010(a)news.albasani.net>,
dorayme <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote:

> if you care at all, please send donations, $US10
> upwards care of me.

I've sent virtual donations to "Spears in Peers" and "Arrows for
Algernon". It's the very least I can do. Thank you for your good work.

leo
From: Paul Sture on
In article <dorayme-33184F.16415227062010(a)news.albasani.net>,
dorayme <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote:

> In article
> <leoblaisdell-C36651.22240326062010(a)News.Individual.NET>,
> Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> > In article <dorayme-816DA2.13542827062010(a)news.albasani.net>,
> > dorayme <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > > I am telling you all - bow down before me goddamit! - rolling
> > > your own, respecting Ockham and Jesus, the wonderfully simple
> > > built in Mac screen capture facility, (never mind java, schmava,
> > > applets, schmapplets), is best and most flexible. The pic in the
> > > above URL was made with normal Mac Command Shift 4 and a simple
> > > transparent backed arrow image dropped and dragged over where I
> > > wanted it.
> >
> > I simply can't agree.
>
> > The arrow is not touching the blue area but is
> > touching where you wanted it. It has to be in the blue area. Otherwise
> > it's nonfunctional and misleading decoration. Wouldn't you agree?
> > Otherwise, your point stands and the arrow is breathtakingly beautiful.
> >
>
> The point is that the point, of the arrow that is, can be moved
> up, along with the rest of the arrow.
>
> Talking about the point of arrows, ever seen an arrow lose its
> point? It is the saddest thing imaginable. It is sad enough for a
> human life to lose any point but with an arrow the pain is
> sharpened by orders of magnitude. Humans can go on in
> pointlessness. They do. But arrows? No, the point of an arrow
> *is* its whole point.
>
> I run a small clinic for lost and broken arrows and I know. I
> have personally talked to some of the saddest cases when I do my
> rounds. It is almost impossible to convince one that has lost its
> point that there is a point to going on existing. So necessary is
> a point to an arrow that we will transplant points that have lost
> their arrows from a bank of them that we have established. About
> this latter, btw, it is supported by donations. If I have touched
> your hearts, if you care at all, please send donations, $US10
> upwards care of me.

For more on being pointless, please see Harry Nilsson's "The Point!"

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Point!>

also various bits on Youtube. Here's Part 1
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGFlACG6qvI&feature=related>

--
Paul Sture
From: John McWilliams on
Paul Sture wrote:
> In article <dorayme-33184F.16415227062010(a)news.albasani.net>,
> dorayme <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>
> For more on being pointless, please see Harry Nilsson's "The Point!"
>
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Point!>
>
> also various bits on Youtube. Here's Part 1
> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGFlACG6qvI&feature=related>
>

Excellent point!

From the Wiki:

"They meet curious creatures like giant bees, a "pointed man" pointing
in all directions who proclaims "A point in every direction is the same
as no point at all", a man made of rock who helps Oblio see that
everyone has a point (as in reason) though it might not be readily
displayed."

Rather like usenet......

--
john mcwilliams
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Prev: Editing in iPhoto
Next: PDF editor that ignores "read only"?