SeaMonkey for HTML editing (WYSIWYG)
in [Freeware]
|
Prev: Struggling with Open Office Draw
Next: FileZilla 3.3.3
From: Zaphod on 15 Jun 2010 02:05 Have been trying to find a decent WYSIWIG editor to edit some web pages I have had for a while and after trying both paid and freeware products the only program that could both import my quite basic yes decent looking HTML web pages and edit them without destroying them has been SeaMonkey. Most WYSIWIG programs do not import HTML, you either have to start from scratch or use one of the vendors templates ... so pay for something that does not have what you want them have to start from scratch ... Frontpage messes up everything and the only paid products I tried trial versions of did also ... Well done .
From: Craig on 15 Jun 2010 03:01 On 06/14/2010 11:05 PM, Zaphod wrote: > the only program that could both import my quite basic yes > decent looking HTML web pages and edit them without destroying them > has been SeaMonkey. Have you tried Kompozer? Can't say I use it much anymore but it's one of the best WYSIWYG HTML editors. -- -Craig
From: Zaphod on 15 Jun 2010 04:29 On Jun 15, 5:01 pm, Craig <netburg...(a)REMOVEgmail.com> wrote: > On 06/14/2010 11:05 PM, Zaphod wrote: > > > the only program that could both import my quite basic yes > > decent looking HTML web pages and edit them without destroying them > > has been SeaMonkey. > > Have you tried Kompozer? Can't say I use it much anymore but it's one > of the best WYSIWYG HTML editors. > > -- > -Craig Thanks for the recommendation. am trying Kompozer now... so far I prefer SeaMonkey as it looks exactly as it looks once saved while editing. However Kompozer also handles my pages and saves them without messing them up.
From: Martin Jay on 15 Jun 2010 05:39 On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 23:05:41 -0700 (PDT), Zaphod <isitcomputing(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Have been trying to find a decent WYSIWIG editor to edit some web >pages... There ain't no such thing. -- Martin Jay
From: Martin Jay on 15 Jun 2010 10:32
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:19:04 +0200, Yrrah <Yrrah-acf(a)acf.invalid> wrote: >Martin Jay <martin(a)spam-free.org.uk>: >>There ain't no such thing. >Double negative = positive? ;-) Try explaining that to my bank. :) -- Martin Jay |