From: (PeteCresswell) on 28 Mar 2010 20:37 I think I already know the answer ("NO!") but it seems worth a try. I've got a house where a single WAP will not serve all rooms. I've added a second WAP and it works a-ok when somebody connects to it. But the brass ring would be if devices in the house could just automagically grab whichever WAP is available. Is there any way to make that happen? -- PeteCresswell
From: Jack [MVP-Networking] on 29 Mar 2010 10:01 Hi If you use expensive Pro APs (Like Cisco) you might get real seamless. With regular End-User hardware, set the APs to the same SSID and put each one on a different channel. YMMV, it would work but it would be spotty. I.e., Wireless computer sometime would stay on a weaker AP when you move around and you would need to switch them manually. Jack (MS, MVP-Networking).. "(PeteCresswell)" <x(a)y.Invalid> wrote in message news:rctvq5l66gv1havlh97mhhohsmb7tv40lg(a)4ax.com... >I think I already know the answer ("NO!") but it seems worth a > try. > > I've got a house where a single WAP will not serve all rooms. > > I've added a second WAP and it works a-ok when somebody connects > to it. > > But the brass ring would be if devices in the house could just > automagically grab whichever WAP is available. > > Is there any way to make that happen? > -- > PeteCresswell
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Bluetooth, Broadcom, and Window 7 64-bit Next: BEWARE OF AT&T! |