Seeking a correct explanation for Stellar Abberation
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: How is SR this probability problem explained?
Next: The Infinitely Large Arch (was Re: Three times happening together)
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 21 Mar 2010 16:05 On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:39:18 -0700 (PDT), Jerry <Cephalobus_alienus(a)comcast.net> wrote: >On Mar 21, 4:41�am, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:15:32 -0700 (PDT), Jerry >> <Cephalobus_alie...(a)comcast.net> wrote: >> >On Mar 21, 12:20�am, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > >> >> The bubble around a +ve charge might be 1836 times bigger than one around a >> >> -ve. >> >> >Oh, you are such an IDIOT!!! >> >The Tevatron is a proton-antiproton accelerator. >> >If a positive/negative mass discrepancy existed, it would have been >> >noted ages ago. >> >> Jerry, I was only joking about that .... > >(sigh) >No, you weren't. Crank, you raised a valid point and one I had considered many times myself. You must realise that the WRFB is a broad metaphorical expresssion describing the negative feedback of a moving charge on the applied field which is accelerating that charge. You can't get something for nothing in this world and energy is required to create and maintain the bubble. Before I can answer your question you will have to tell me the exact relationship between 'matter' and 'the stuff fields are made of'. You will also have to tell my why a proton is 1836 x Me or why a muon is 200 Me. Why are there particles with certain masses and not others? Why is there no particle of mass 2Me? Obviously the gamma term crops up in electrodynamics irrespective of Einstein's silly theory. IF the socalled 'relativistic mass increase' exists as claimed for ALL particles, then obviously the WRFB operates on 'unit mass', through its relationship with the fields/energy that make up that 'matter'. >> THe 'relativistic mass increase' of protons has not been accurately >> determined. > >Knowledge of its value is a crucial element of accelerator design. >A factor of 1836 is not something that you can sweep under the >rug. > >> So what is the mysterious 'mass increase' called now...if it exists at >> all...which I doubt in protons. > >I take it that you haven't been reading any of the discussions >in these groups about the topic. No I haven't > >Jerry Henry Wilson... ........provider of free physics lessons
From: Jerry on 21 Mar 2010 20:40 On Mar 21, 3:05 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:39:18 -0700 (PDT), Jerry > > > > > > <Cephalobus_alie...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > >On Mar 21, 4:41 am, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > >> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:15:32 -0700 (PDT), Jerry > >> <Cephalobus_alie...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > >> >On Mar 21, 12:20 am, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > > >> >> The bubble around a +ve charge might be 1836 times bigger than one around a > >> >> -ve. > > >> >Oh, you are such an IDIOT!!! > >> >The Tevatron is a proton-antiproton accelerator. > >> >If a positive/negative mass discrepancy existed, it would have been > >> >noted ages ago. > > >> Jerry, I was only joking about that .... > > >(sigh) > >No, you weren't. > > Crank, you raised a valid point and one I had considered many times myself. Sorry, you have no credibility. Google as you will, there is zero evidence on these newsgroups that you ever considered this issue before I raised it. > You must realise that the WRFB is a broad metaphorical expresssion describing > the negative feedback of a moving charge on the applied field which is > accelerating that charge. You can't get something for nothing in this world and > energy is required to create and maintain the bubble. > > Before I can answer your question you will have to tell me the exact > relationship between 'matter' and 'the stuff fields are made of'. You will also > have to tell my why a proton is 1836 x Me or why a muon is 200 Me. Why are > there particles with certain masses and not others? Why is there no particle of > mass 2Me? > > Obviously the gamma term crops up in electrodynamics irrespective of Einstein's > silly theory. IF the socalled 'relativistic mass increase' exists as claimed > for ALL particles, then obviously the WRFB operates on 'unit mass', through its > relationship with the fields/energy that make up that 'matter'. Pure Bullshit. What you are saying is that you don't know how to fix your theory, and you want ME to help???? > >> THe 'relativistic mass increase' of protons has not been accurately > >> determined. > > >Knowledge of its value is a crucial element of accelerator design. > >A factor of 1836 is not something that you can sweep under the > >rug. > > >> So what is the mysterious 'mass increase' called now...if it exists at > >> all...which I doubt in protons. > > >I take it that you haven't been reading any of the discussions > >in these groups about the topic. > > No I haven't You are arrogant, ignorant, stupid, and just plain uninformed. Jerry
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 22 Mar 2010 05:29 On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:40:17 -0700 (PDT), Jerry <Cephalobus_alienus(a)comcast.net> wrote: >On Mar 21, 3:05�pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:39:18 -0700 (PDT), Jerry >> >> >> >> >> >> <Cephalobus_alie...(a)comcast.net> wrote: >> >On Mar 21, 4:41�am, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >> >> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:15:32 -0700 (PDT), Jerry >> >> <Cephalobus_alie...(a)comcast.net> wrote: >> >> >On Mar 21, 12:20�am, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >> >> >> >> The bubble around a +ve charge might be 1836 times bigger than one around a >> >> >> -ve. >> >> >> >Oh, you are such an IDIOT!!! >> >> >The Tevatron is a proton-antiproton accelerator. >> >> >If a positive/negative mass discrepancy existed, it would have been >> >> >noted ages ago. >> >> >> Jerry, I was only joking about that .... >> >> >(sigh) >> >No, you weren't. >> >> Crank, you raised a valid point and one I had considered many times myself. > >Sorry, you have no credibility. Google as you will, there is zero >evidence on these newsgroups that you ever considered this issue >before I raised it. > >> You must realise that the WRFB is a broad metaphorical expresssion describing >> the negative feedback of a moving charge on the applied field which is >> accelerating that charge. You can't get something for nothing in this world and >> energy is required to create and maintain the bubble. >> >> Before I can answer your question you will have to tell me the exact >> relationship between 'matter' and 'the stuff fields are made of'. You will also >> have to tell my why a proton is 1836 x Me or why a muon is 200 Me. Why are >> there particles with certain masses and not others? Why is there no particle of >> mass 2Me? >> >> Obviously the gamma term crops up in electrodynamics irrespective of Einstein's >> silly theory. IF the socalled 'relativistic mass increase' exists as claimed >> for ALL particles, then obviously the WRFB operates on 'unit mass', through its >> relationship with the fields/energy that make up that 'matter'. � > >Pure Bullshit. What you are saying is that you don't know how to >fix your theory, and you want ME to help???? You cannot answer any of my questions....I didn't think you could. >> >> THe 'relativistic mass increase' of protons has not been accurately >> >> determined. >> >> >Knowledge of its value is a crucial element of accelerator design. >> >A factor of 1836 is not something that you can sweep under the >> >rug. >> >> >> So what is the mysterious 'mass increase' called now...if it exists at >> >> all...which I doubt in protons. >> >> >I take it that you haven't been reading any of the discussions >> >in these groups about the topic. >> >> No I haven't > >You are arrogant, ignorant, stupid, and just plain uninformed. > >Jerry Henry Wilson... ........A person's IQ = his snipping ability.
From: Androcles on 22 Mar 2010 07:24 "Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message news:c2eeq51ftgumrqi0fujtfrkqb9o01k34k0(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:40:17 -0700 (PDT), Jerry > <Cephalobus_alienus(a)comcast.net> wrote: > >>On Mar 21, 3:05 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >>> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:39:18 -0700 (PDT), Jerry >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> <Cephalobus_alie...(a)comcast.net> wrote: >>> >On Mar 21, 4:41 am, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >>> >> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:15:32 -0700 (PDT), Jerry >>> >> <Cephalobus_alie...(a)comcast.net> wrote: >>> >> >On Mar 21, 12:20 am, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >>> >>> >> >> The bubble around a +ve charge might be 1836 times bigger than one >>> >> >> around a >>> >> >> -ve. >>> >>> >> >Oh, you are such an IDIOT!!! >>> >> >The Tevatron is a proton-antiproton accelerator. >>> >> >If a positive/negative mass discrepancy existed, it would have been >>> >> >noted ages ago. >>> >>> >> Jerry, I was only joking about that .... >>> >>> >(sigh) >>> >No, you weren't. >>> >>> Crank, you raised a valid point and one I had considered many times >>> myself. >> >>Sorry, you have no credibility. Google as you will, there is zero >>evidence on these newsgroups that you ever considered this issue >>before I raised it. >> >>> You must realise that the WRFB is a broad metaphorical expresssion >>> describing >>> the negative feedback of a moving charge on the applied field which is >>> accelerating that charge. You can't get something for nothing in this >>> world and >>> energy is required to create and maintain the bubble. >>> >>> Before I can answer your question you will have to tell me the exact >>> relationship between 'matter' and 'the stuff fields are made of'. You >>> will also >>> have to tell my why a proton is 1836 x Me or why a muon is 200 Me. Why >>> are >>> there particles with certain masses and not others? Why is there no >>> particle of >>> mass 2Me? >>> >>> Obviously the gamma term crops up in electrodynamics irrespective of >>> Einstein's >>> silly theory. IF the socalled 'relativistic mass increase' exists as >>> claimed >>> for ALL particles, then obviously the WRFB operates on 'unit mass', >>> through its >>> relationship with the fields/energy that make up that 'matter'. >> >>Pure Bullshit. What you are saying is that you don't know how to >>fix your theory, and you want ME to help???? > > You cannot answer any of my questions....I didn't think you could. > >>> >> THe 'relativistic mass increase' of protons has not been accurately >>> >> determined. >>> >>> >Knowledge of its value is a crucial element of accelerator design. >>> >A factor of 1836 is not something that you can sweep under the >>> >rug. >>> >>> >> So what is the mysterious 'mass increase' called now...if it exists >>> >> at >>> >> all...which I doubt in protons. >>> >>> >I take it that you haven't been reading any of the discussions >>> >in these groups about the topic. >>> >>> No I haven't >> >>You are arrogant, ignorant, stupid, and just plain uninformed. >> >>Jerry > > > Henry Wilson... > > .......A person's IQ = his snipping ability. Bullshit, IQ is inversely proportional to snipping ability. The more they snip, the lower it is. Jeery has an IQ of 2, just above Inertwit who is marginally above Dork. Only the fraud Jeery could say: "a narrower set of values tau in the relatively moving frame" and then come up with tau = 49.2 = 2.2 * sqrt(1-0.999^2) where 2.2 usec is the mean lifetime of a muon and tau = t * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) is Einstein's equation, even if millions of shitheads agree with him and don't know division from multiplication (like you).
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 22 Mar 2010 15:42
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:24:54 -0000, "Androcles" <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_w> wrote: > >"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message >news:c2eeq51ftgumrqi0fujtfrkqb9o01k34k0(a)4ax.com... >> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:40:17 -0700 (PDT), Jerry >>>> Obviously the gamma term crops up in electrodynamics irrespective of >>>> Einstein's >>>> silly theory. IF the socalled 'relativistic mass increase' exists as >>>> claimed >>>> for ALL particles, then obviously the WRFB operates on 'unit mass', >>>> through its >>>> relationship with the fields/energy that make up that 'matter'. >>> >>>Pure Bullshit. What you are saying is that you don't know how to >>>fix your theory, and you want ME to help???? >> >> You cannot answer any of my questions....I didn't think you could. >> >>>> >> THe 'relativistic mass increase' of protons has not been accurately >>>> No I haven't >>> >>>You are arrogant, ignorant, stupid, and just plain uninformed. >>> >>>Jerry >> >> >> Henry Wilson... >> >> .......A person's IQ = his snipping ability. > >Bullshit, IQ is inversely proportional to snipping ability. To be able to snip correctly is an art. Both quantity and quality must be considered. In the case of Roberts and Andersen, snippping is used to remove material they cannot answer or is acutely embarassing to them. That shows very poor snipping ability because their motives are so obvious. The idiots Inertial and now 'train' have been sending purile 500-700 line messages to each other just to add their own one liner at the end. This demonstration of zero snipping correlates highly with the nonsense ratings of their messages. >The more they snip, the lower it is. >Jeery has an IQ of 2, just above Inertwit who is marginally above Dork. >Only the fraud Jeery could say: "a narrower set of values tau in the >relatively >moving frame" and then come up with tau = 49.2 = 2.2 * sqrt(1-0.999^2) >where 2.2 usec is the mean lifetime of a muon and tau = t * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) >is Einstein's equation, even if millions of shitheads agree with him and >don't know division from multiplication (like you). well, it's another version of the twins paradox.....that proves SR wrong. .... why worry about it. It doesn't happen anyway. There are no LTs in the real world. > Henry Wilson... ........A person's IQ = his snipping ability. |