Seeking a correct explanation for Stellar Abberation
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: How is SR this probability problem explained?
Next: The Infinitely Large Arch (was Re: Three times happening together)
From: Inertial on 22 Mar 2010 17:55 "Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message news:32hfq5hus6nsjffnret3t2o0qgtoks0bdp(a)4ax.com... > There are no LTs in the real > world. Just keep lying to yourself Henry. The only fool you are fooling is you.
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 22 Mar 2010 18:27 On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:55:43 +1100, "Inertial" <relatively(a)rest.com> wrote: >"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message >news:32hfq5hus6nsjffnret3t2o0qgtoks0bdp(a)4ax.com... >> There are no LTs in the real >> world. > >Just keep lying to yourself Henry. The only fool you are fooling is you. Even an idiot like you should know that nothing at all happens to a rod or clock as a result of a speed change. A rod defines the same absolute spatial interval however and wherever it is taken. An oscillator period defines an absolute time interval, ditto. Henry Wilson... ........A person's IQ = his snipping ability.
From: Inertial on 22 Mar 2010 18:38 "Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message news:lgrfq5tr3n7a4uqvlnikidkqqkhgm4ffjm(a)4ax.com... > Even an idiot like you should know that nothing at all happens to a rod or > clock as a result of a speed change. Nothing is claimed to happen to the rod itself, it is the measurements of the rod by moving observers that are different. You still don't know what SR says, and still lie about it > A rod defines the same absolute spatial interval An absolute space-time interval, yes. You still don't know what SR says, and still lie about it > however and wherever it is > taken. All observers measure the same space-time interval. But not the same spatial length. You still don't know what SR says, and still lie about it > An oscillator period defines an absolute time interval, ditto. An absolute space-time interval, yes. All observers measure the same space-time interval. But not the same temporal duration. You still don't know what SR says, and still lie about it
From: eric gisse on 22 Mar 2010 18:46 ...@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:55:43 +1100, "Inertial" <relatively(a)rest.com> > wrote: > >>"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message >>news:32hfq5hus6nsjffnret3t2o0qgtoks0bdp(a)4ax.com... >>> There are no LTs in the real >>> world. >> >>Just keep lying to yourself Henry. The only fool you are fooling is you. > > Even an idiot like you should know that nothing at all happens to a rod or > clock as a result of a speed change. > > A rod defines the same absolute spatial interval however and wherever it > is taken. > An oscillator period defines an absolute time interval, ditto. A decade running and you haven't learned a damn thing. Nice. > > > Henry Wilson... > > .......A person's IQ = his snipping ability.
From: Androcles on 22 Mar 2010 19:02
"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message news:lgrfq5tr3n7a4uqvlnikidkqqkhgm4ffjm(a)4ax.com... > On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:55:43 +1100, "Inertial" <relatively(a)rest.com> > wrote: > >>"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message >>news:32hfq5hus6nsjffnret3t2o0qgtoks0bdp(a)4ax.com... <snip> > Henry Wilson... > > .......A person's IQ = his snipping ability. My IQ is 300 on the Awilson snipping scale! |