Seeking a correct explanation for Stellar Abberation
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: How is SR this probability problem explained?
Next: The Infinitely Large Arch (was Re: Three times happening together)
From: Androcles on 3 May 2010 18:25 "Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message news:vrgut5ltpjbgecstd3d1l94hett6be2ell(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 03 May 2010 13:38:34 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" > > It is your use of the word 'trajectory' that is the issue here. > Shouldn't you be backing your boy's trajectories at the "Crucible" in Sheffield tonight in the World Snooker Championship? The fuzzy little ozzie is ahead!
From: eric gisse on 3 May 2010 19:06 ...@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > On Mon, 03 May 2010 13:38:34 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" > <paul.b.andersen(a)somewhere.no> wrote: > >>On 27.04.2010 00:35, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: >>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:03:32 +0200, "Paul B. >>> Andersen"<someone(a)somewhere.no> wrote: > >>>> It can be expressed by one of the coordinates as >>>> a function of the two others: >>>> z = f(x,y) (or more generally f(x,y,z) = 0) >>>> (this form has its limitations, it isn't always possible >>>> to express it this way) >>>> >>>> or it can be expressed on parametric form: >>>> z = f_z(p) >>>> y = f_y(p) >>>> x = f_z(p) >>>> where p is the parameter. >>>> The most common parameter is the time, of course, >>>> but there is always an infinite number of possible >>>> parameters which can be used. >>> >>> What you are calling 'trajectory' I would call a 'plot'. >> >>Quite. >>But now you have learned what a 'trajectory' is in English. >>Don't you speak English down under? >> >>> >>> You still cannot explain how the path of an object, whose movement is >>> restricted to the axis of a straight tube, can ever be curved. >> >>That's what your homework is about. >>Your straight tube is stationary in the frame of reference >>described in your homework. > > It is straight in ALL frames of reference. > > Tell me this. If an object moves randomly inside a straight tube, what is > the direction of the force vectors acting on it? > > A) all force vectors are aligned with the tube in ALL frames. > > Therefore the TRUE trajectory of the object is confined to a straight line > in ALL frames. > The straight line just happens to move sideways in other frames, resulting > in curved plots of the object's path. You know that failing freshman physics is something to be ashamed of, not PROUD of, right Henri? [...]
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 4 May 2010 02:27 On Mon, 3 May 2010 23:25:46 +0100, "Androcles" <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > >"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message >news:vrgut5ltpjbgecstd3d1l94hett6be2ell(a)4ax.com... >> On Mon, 03 May 2010 13:38:34 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" > >> >> It is your use of the word 'trajectory' that is the issue here. >> >Shouldn't you be backing your boy's trajectories at the "Crucible" in >Sheffield tonight in the World Snooker Championship? The fuzzy little ozzie >is ahead! Snooker doesn't get much publicity down here....not enough blood or body contact for commercial TV. Henry Wilson... ........A person's IQ = his snipping ability.
From: Androcles on 4 May 2010 02:34 "Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message news:jefvt51m7j2tgtd3nbs3qp9m7a8r7024o7(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 3 May 2010 23:25:46 +0100, "Androcles" > <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> > wrote: > >> >>"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message >>news:vrgut5ltpjbgecstd3d1l94hett6be2ell(a)4ax.com... >>> On Mon, 03 May 2010 13:38:34 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" >> >>> >>> It is your use of the word 'trajectory' that is the issue here. >>> >>Shouldn't you be backing your boy's trajectories at the "Crucible" in >>Sheffield tonight in the World Snooker Championship? The fuzzy little >>ozzie >>is ahead! > > Snooker doesn't get much publicity down here....not enough blood or body > contact for commercial TV. > Shame, because he won. Neil Robertson, only three non-Brits have ever won the title.
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 4 May 2010 16:07
On Tue, 4 May 2010 07:34:37 +0100, "Androcles" <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > >"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message >news:jefvt51m7j2tgtd3nbs3qp9m7a8r7024o7(a)4ax.com... >> On Mon, 3 May 2010 23:25:46 +0100, "Androcles" >> <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> >> wrote: >> >>> >>>"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message >>>news:vrgut5ltpjbgecstd3d1l94hett6be2ell(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Mon, 03 May 2010 13:38:34 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" >>> >>>> >>>> It is your use of the word 'trajectory' that is the issue here. >>>> >>>Shouldn't you be backing your boy's trajectories at the "Crucible" in >>>Sheffield tonight in the World Snooker Championship? The fuzzy little >>>ozzie >>>is ahead! >> >> Snooker doesn't get much publicity down here....not enough blood or body >> contact for commercial TV. >> >Shame, because he won. Neil Robertson, only three non-Brits have ever won >the title. yes, He won. ...and it did receive considerable mention in the media. It was a good effort. ....it appears that pommies aren't the only ones who waste their young days in snooker rooms.... Henry Wilson... ........A person's IQ = his snipping ability. |