From: Steve Fenwick on
In article <2793488.G6xLiZASKD(a)ale.cx>, alexd <troffasky(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Meanwhile, at the alt.internet.wireless Job Justification Hearings, TBerk
> chose the tried and tested strategy of:
>
> > It might seem stupid and obvious but actually having it spelled out
> > like that does help.
>
> Something else that isn't obvious to most people is that Wifi speeds don't
> represent an attainable throughput - IME being connected at 54Mbps equals a
> throughput of about 22Mbps for example, with similar percentages at other
> speeds. I haven't used N, but I've no reason to believe it'll be
> substantially different.

Yes, it's just the PHY rate. The TCP throughput rate will be some
fraction of the actual connected rate, which is some fraction (usually)
of the listed or rated PHY rate.

Steve

--
steve <at> w0x0f <dot> com
"Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of
arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to
skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, chip shot in the other, body thoroughly
used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"