From: Jeremy Nicoll - news posts on 17 Feb 2010 19:52 Aragorn <aragorn(a)chatfactory.invalid> wrote: > ... The kernel does contain some routines to put certain USB devices in > "ACPI sleep state", but for all I know that could simply be some code that > tells the kernel not to poll the devices after a given time-out until some > process is trying to access them again. Would it be stupid to write a small shell script that - say - echos a timestamp into a file on the disks concerned, and use cron to run that script every so-many minutes? -- Jeremy C B Nicoll - my opinions are my own. Email sent to my from-address will be deleted. Instead, please reply to newsreplynnn(a)wingsandbeaks.org.uk replacing "nnn" by "284".
From: Aragorn on 18 Feb 2010 01:31 On Thursday 18 February 2010 01:52 in comp.os.linux.misc, somebody identifying as Jeremy Nicoll - news posts wrote... > Aragorn <aragorn(a)chatfactory.invalid> wrote: > >> ... The kernel does contain some routines to put certain USB devices >> in "ACPI sleep state", but for all I know that could simply be some >> code that tells the kernel not to poll the devices after a given >> time-out until some process is trying to access them again. > > Would it be stupid to write a small shell script that - say - echos a > timestamp into a file on the disks concerned, and use cron to run that > script every so-many minutes? Stupid? No, definitely not. But it would be an ugly hack. There ought to be better mechanisms to prevent devices from going into an unwanted sleep state, and I suspect that the kernel provides for some mechanisms for that. Provided of course that the sleep state is not induced by the device's built-in logic itself, because it would be trickier to override that, and in such a case, your script might come in handy. -- *Aragorn* (registered GNU/Linux user #223157)
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Prev: rsync mystery Next: lsof, pid, which Desktop/VT are running appY ? |