From: tm on

"AZ Nomad" <aznomad.3(a)PremoveOBthisOX.COM> wrote in message
news:slrnhv8135.e5n.aznomad.3(a)ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net...
> On Wed, 19 May 2010 10:44:05 GMT, Jan Panteltje
> <pNaonStpealmtje(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Now there is free code space, free code space free code space,
>>whatshallwedo with the free code space?
>>I have some idea.
>
> version 2 will take care of that

With MS, it is the patches.


From: Fred Bartoli on
Jan Panteltje a �crit :
> On a sunny day (Wed, 19 May 2010 05:39:56 -0700 (PDT)) it happened MooseFET
> <kensmith(a)rahul.net> wrote in
> <b1c4a991-5481-4d29-96c6-c93c780a197d(a)h37g2000pra.googlegroups.com>:
>
>> On May 19, 3:44 am, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> I just wrote a program for a Microchip PIC 18F14K22 microcontroller
>>> driving a ENC28J60 Ethernet controller in ASM.
>>> Because this PIC's SPI interface does not work in I bitbanged it,,,
>>> As this PIC has only 256 bytes of RAM.....
>>>
>>> So far so good... But what does it do???
>>> Well many things, but one of it is that it (oh it has a MAX232 too, ye=
>> know a MAXIM chip, I have some,
>>> the rumour that those do not exist is false, but you do not need the MAXI=
>> M chip you
>>> can do it with a NPN transistor and diode),
>> Digikey has some LT1081s. They have the same pine out as the MAX232
>> but
>> is less likely to blow up.
>
> I do not remember ever having killed a MAX232 :-)
>

Neither do I.

OTOH, I don't remember ever using one...


--
Thanks,
Fred.
From: D Yuniskis on
Jan Panteltje wrote:
> I just wrote a program for a Microchip PIC 18F14K22 microcontroller
> driving a ENC28J60 Ethernet controller in ASM.
> Because this PIC's SPI interface does not work in I bitbanged it,,,
> As this PIC has only 256 bytes of RAM.....
>
> Who needs a 'computah' for remote telemetry :-)
> What 'bloat'?
>
> Now there is free code space, free code space free code space, whatshallwedo with the free code space?
> I have some idea.

You're just a bit over 10 years too late :>

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/08/990811075627.htm
From: Jan Panteltje on
On a sunny day (Wed, 19 May 2010 13:01:31 -0700) it happened D Yuniskis
<not.going.to.be(a)seen.com> wrote in <ht1fmv$u03$2(a)speranza.aioe.org>:

>Jan Panteltje wrote:
>> I just wrote a program for a Microchip PIC 18F14K22 microcontroller
>> driving a ENC28J60 Ethernet controller in ASM.
>> Because this PIC's SPI interface does not work in I bitbanged it,,,
>> As this PIC has only 256 bytes of RAM.....
>>
>> Who needs a 'computah' for remote telemetry :-)
>> What 'bloat'?
>>
>> Now there is free code space, free code space free code space, whatshallwedo with the free code space?
>> I have some idea.
>
>You're just a bit over 10 years too late :>
>
>http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/08/990811075627.htm

No, that one is connected via a serial port probably PPP,
mine has a real ethernet RJ45 connection.
There is a PIC with build in Ethernet controller but in one of those tiny packages.
I use the 18F14K22 PIC and a ENC28J60 controller, both DIL,
making it much easier to put together a quick veroboard thing.
That iPIC TCP/IP stack sounds interesting though, as some services, for example Vodafone,
seem to block UDP packets one way, probably stateful firewalls used against
VOIP.
From: Bitrex on
Jan Panteltje wrote:
> I just wrote a program for a Microchip PIC 18F14K22 microcontroller
> driving a ENC28J60 Ethernet controller in ASM.
> Because this PIC's SPI interface does not work in I bitbanged it,,,
> As this PIC has only 256 bytes of RAM.....
>
> So far so good... But what does it do???
> Well many things, but one of it is that it (oh it has a MAX232 too, ye know a MAXIM chip, I have some,
> the rumour that those do not exist is false, but you do not need the MAXIM chip you
> can do it with a NPN transistor and diode),
> so:
> It streams the serial port to UDP worldwide, sort of internet radio.
> At 115200 Bd it just about can send a 64 kbps mp3 worldwide, and you can just hang
> a player on it (xine, mplayer, ffplay, whatever, best something with a cache or buffer).

I'd love to try it out, but I'm an AVR guy - I wonder how difficult it
would be to port the code to use on something like an ATMega168....