From: bert on
On Feb 25, 11:31 am, dlzc <dl...(a)cox.net> wrote:
> Dear BURT:
>
> On Feb 24, 6:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 24, 5:30 pm,dlzc<dl...(a)cox.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 24, 5:22 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Motion from the solar flow ought to push
> > > > planetary matter outward in its orbit.
>
> > > Would violate conservation of angular
> > > momentum. For other reasons, some planets
> > > move in, and some move out.
>
> > What is the net push of the solar wind?
>
> > This cannot be overlooked.
>
> The "push of the solar wind" simply allows the planet under
> consideration to orbit a little closer in than it would without the
> solar wind.  A centimeter or two, perhaps.
>
> David A. Smith

Solar wind is a push out,and that means orbits get bigger and
bigger, Light push in lots of time adds up I knew that at 10 when
with 5 other friendds we moved a 12 ton barge and tore the Chelsea
pier down (1938) TreBert
From: dlzc on
Dear bert:

On Feb 27, 1:14 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote:
> On Feb 25, 11:31 am,dlzc<dl...(a)cox.net> wrote:
> > On Feb 24, 6:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 24, 5:30 pm,dlzc<dl...(a)cox.net> wrote:
> > > > On Feb 24, 5:22 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Motion from the solar flow ought to push
> > > > > planetary matter outward in its orbit.
>
> > > > Would violate conservation of angular
> > > > momentum. For other reasons, some planets
> > > > move in, and some move out.
>
> > > What is the net push of the solar wind?
>
> > > This cannot be overlooked.
>
> > The "push of the solar wind" simply allows
> > the planet under consideration to orbit a
> > little closer in than it would without the
> > solar wind.  A centimeter or two, perhaps.
>
> Solar wind is a push out,and that means orbits
> get bigger and bigger,   Light push in lots of
> time adds up  I knew that at 10 when with 5
> other friendds we moved a 12 ton barge and
> tore the Chelsea pier down   (1938)   TreBert

This is orbital mechanics. The solar wind "circularizes" orbits in
its path. Turn off the solar wind (using magic), and Earth's orbital
eccentricity will increase, going both further in and further out.

David A. Smith
From: BURT on
On Feb 28, 9:11 am, dlzc <dl...(a)cox.net> wrote:
> Dear bert:
>
> On Feb 27, 1:14 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 25, 11:31 am,dlzc<dl...(a)cox.net> wrote:
> > > On Feb 24, 6:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > On Feb 24, 5:30 pm,dlzc<dl...(a)cox.net> wrote:
> > > > > On Feb 24, 5:22 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Motion from the solar flow ought to push
> > > > > > planetary matter outward in its orbit.
>
> > > > > Would violate conservation of angular
> > > > > momentum. For other reasons, some planets
> > > > > move in, and some move out.
>
> > > > What is the net push of the solar wind?
>
> > > > This cannot be overlooked.
>
> > > The "push of the solar wind" simply allows
> > > the planet under consideration to orbit a
> > > little closer in than it would without the
> > > solar wind.  A centimeter or two, perhaps.
>
> > Solar wind is a push out,and that means orbits
> > get bigger and bigger,   Light push in lots of
> > time adds up  I knew that at 10 when with 5
> > other friendds we moved a 12 ton barge and
> > tore the Chelsea pier down   (1938)   TreBert
>
> This is orbital mechanics.  The solar wind "circularizes" orbits in
> its path.  Turn off the solar wind (using magic), and Earth's orbital
> eccentricity will increase, going both further in and further out.
>
> David A. Smith- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text

No. The eccentricity will remain the same without a solar wind push.

Mitch Raemsch