Prev: Exactly why the theories of relativity are complete nonsense- the basic mistake exposed!
Next: Two times happening together
From: BURT on 24 Feb 2010 19:22 Motion from the solar flow ought to push planetary matter outward in its orbit. Mitch Raemsch
From: dlzc on 24 Feb 2010 20:30 Dear BURT: On Feb 24, 5:22 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Motion from the solar flow ought to push > planetary matter outward in its orbit. Would violate conservation of angular momentum. For other reasons, some planets move in, and some move out. David A. Smith
From: BURT on 24 Feb 2010 20:32 On Feb 24, 5:30 pm, dlzc <dl...(a)cox.net> wrote: > Dear BURT: > > On Feb 24, 5:22 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Motion from the solar flow ought to push > > planetary matter outward in its orbit. > > Would violate conservation of angular momentum. > For other reasons, some planets move in, and some move out. > > David A. Smith What is the net push of the solar wind? This cannot be overlooked. Mitch Raemsch
From: dlzc on 25 Feb 2010 11:31 Dear BURT: On Feb 24, 6:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Feb 24, 5:30 pm,dlzc<dl...(a)cox.net> wrote: > > > On Feb 24, 5:22 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Motion from the solar flow ought to push > > > planetary matter outward in its orbit. > > > Would violate conservation of angular > > momentum. For other reasons, some planets > > move in, and some move out. > > What is the net push of the solar wind? > > This cannot be overlooked. The "push of the solar wind" simply allows the planet under consideration to orbit a little closer in than it would without the solar wind. A centimeter or two, perhaps. David A. Smith
From: BURT on 26 Feb 2010 17:55
On Feb 25, 8:31 am, dlzc <dl...(a)cox.net> wrote: > Dear BURT: > > On Feb 24, 6:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Feb 24, 5:30 pm,dlzc<dl...(a)cox.net> wrote: > > > > On Feb 24, 5:22 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Motion from the solar flow ought to push > > > > planetary matter outward in its orbit. > > > > Would violate conservation of angular > > > momentum. For other reasons, some planets > > > move in, and some move out. > > > What is the net push of the solar wind? > > > This cannot be overlooked. > > The "push of the solar wind" simply allows the planet under > consideration to orbit a little closer in than it would without the > solar wind. A centimeter or two, perhaps. > > David A. Smith David you are bassackwards. You mean further out not further in. But you are like the rest. Mitch Raemsch |