Some mathematical truth
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Proton Radius derived from "Nobel Prize-winning" hedge-fund formula: BP's cap&trade!
Next: What makes a formula - to be relativistic??
From: Marshall on 5 Jul 2010 15:24 On Jul 5, 5:39 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 5, 12:34 am, Marshall <marshall.spi...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jul 4, 9:25 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > A quantum fluctuation that produces light waves instead of matter. > > > > Wouldn't that be actual light, not virtual light? And quantum fluct- > > > you-Asians can produce what type of matter? > > > 1. Actual. > > > 2. Potential. > > > Marshall > > Yes, you're learning, grasshopper. Cybernetically (practically) there > are just 2 infinities, as you state. Now, if you want to go the road > Cantor did and waste your life exploring the infinity of mathematical > infinites and then commit suicide over them, be my guest. Wow, so you're anti-Cantor, huh? I mean, I *knew* you were a dumbass, but I had no idea how deep it ran. Marshall
From: Aatu Koskensilta on 5 Jul 2010 18:00 Matt <30days(a)net.net> writes: > The conditions at and type of death are irrelevant? The conditions at and type of death of Cantor are quite relevant as far as the dangers of pondering imponderable infinities while clinically depressed are concerned, in so far as we regard a single data point as relevant. Mathematically speaking, it's of no consequence even if Cantor went mad and murdered all of Germany, by ferociously biting at their ankles while reciting Bacon, as an unfortunate result of too much mulling over infinite infinities of unspeakable character. -- Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta(a)uta.fi) "Wovon man nicht sprechan kann, dar�ber muss man schweigen" - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
From: Don Stockbauer on 5 Jul 2010 18:12 On Jul 5, 2:24 pm, Marshall <marshall.spi...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 5, 5:39 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 5, 12:34 am, Marshall <marshall.spi...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 4, 9:25 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > A quantum fluctuation that produces light waves instead of matter.. > > > > > Wouldn't that be actual light, not virtual light? And quantum fluct- > > > > you-Asians can produce what type of matter? > > > > 1. Actual. > > > > 2. Potential. > > > > Marshall > > > Yes, you're learning, grasshopper. Cybernetically (practically) there > > are just 2 infinities, as you state. Now, if you want to go the road > > Cantor did and waste your life exploring the infinity of mathematical > > infinites and then commit suicide over them, be my guest. > > Wow, so you're anti-Cantor, huh? I mean, I *knew* you were a > dumbass, but I had no idea how deep it ran. Sounds a bit late to kiss and make up, I assume.
From: Don Stockbauer on 5 Jul 2010 18:17 On Jul 5, 5:00 pm, Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensi...(a)uta.fi> wrote: > Matt <30d...(a)net.net> writes: > > The conditions at and type of death are irrelevant? > > The conditions at and type of death of Cantor are quite relevant as far > as the dangers of pondering imponderable infinities while clinically > depressed are concerned, in so far as we regard a single data point as > relevant. Mathematically speaking, it's of no consequence even if Cantor > went mad and murdered all of Germany, by ferociously biting at their > ankles while reciting Bacon, as an unfortunate result of too much > mulling over infinite infinities of unspeakable character. You're exactly right. I mean, like it's of no consequence whatsoever what happens here on the planet. If we all die it doesn't matter, there's 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 other suns out to the cosmological event horion, more beyond that, with gazillions of other planets with intelligent life just waiting in line to fill in for us, so we would not be missed in the least, even by us, after we dissociate.
From: purple on 5 Jul 2010 18:40
On 7/5/2010 5:17 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote: > On Jul 5, 5:00 pm, Aatu Koskensilta<aatu.koskensi...(a)uta.fi> wrote: >> Matt<30d...(a)net.net> writes: >>> The conditions at and type of death are irrelevant? >> >> The conditions at and type of death of Cantor are quite relevant as far >> as the dangers of pondering imponderable infinities while clinically >> depressed are concerned, in so far as we regard a single data point as >> relevant. Mathematically speaking, it's of no consequence even if Cantor >> went mad and murdered all of Germany, by ferociously biting at their >> ankles while reciting Bacon, as an unfortunate result of too much >> mulling over infinite infinities of unspeakable character. > > You're exactly right. I mean, like it's of no consequence whatsoever > what happens here on the planet. If we all die it doesn't matter, > there's 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 other suns out to the > cosmological event horion, more beyond that, with gazillions of other > planets with intelligent life just waiting in line to fill in for us, > so we would not be missed in the least, even by us, after we > dissociate. Finally, something more interesting than BURT. I do like the creativity that's in these two posts. 'Bout time! Who said reality matters? They were loco. |