Some mathematical truth
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Proton Radius derived from "Nobel Prize-winning" hedge-fund formula: BP's cap&trade!
Next: What makes a formula - to be relativistic??
From: BruceS on 7 Jul 2010 17:19 On Jul 6, 1:40 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 6, 9:28 am, BruceS <bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 5, 8:35 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 5, 9:33 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 5, 7:28 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 7/5/2010 6:20 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 5, 5:40 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > >> On 7/5/2010 5:17 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote: > > > > > > >>> On Jul 5, 5:00 pm, Aatu Koskensilta<aatu.koskensi...(a)uta.fi> wrote: > > > > > >>>> Matt<30d...(a)net.net> writes: > > > > > >>>>> The conditions at and type of death are irrelevant? > > > > > > >>>> The conditions at and type of death of Cantor are quite relevant as far > > > > > >>>> as the dangers of pondering imponderable infinities while clinically > > > > > >>>> depressed are concerned, in so far as we regard a single data point as > > > > > >>>> relevant. Mathematically speaking, it's of no consequence even if Cantor > > > > > >>>> went mad and murdered all of Germany, by ferociously biting at their > > > > > >>>> ankles while reciting Bacon, as an unfortunate result of too much > > > > > >>>> mulling over infinite infinities of unspeakable character. > > > > > > >>> You're exactly right. I mean, like it's of no consequence whatsoever > > > > > >>> what happens here on the planet. If we all die it doesn't matter, > > > > > >>> there's 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 other suns out to the > > > > > >>> cosmological event horion, more beyond that, with gazillions of other > > > > > >>> planets with intelligent life just waiting in line to fill in for us, > > > > > >>> so we would not be missed in the least, even by us, after we > > > > > >>> dissociate. > > > > > > >> Finally, something more interesting than BURT. I do like the > > > > > >> creativity that's in these two posts. 'Bout time! Who said > > > > > >> reality matters? They were loco. > > > > > > > Forward your concerns to General Chilton. > > > > > > Based on what I wrote, he owes me! > > > > > He may be hard for you to reach, there under Shy Ann Mountin, writhing > > > > his hands with devilish plans for Humanity. But be persistent, you > > > > may get through.- > > > > "Writhing" doesn't sound quite right - insert some other word. > > > ITYM "wringing" > > Yes, yes, that's what he would be doing, that's the word. > > Actually, again, a bad joke, I think we're past all that. We're posting in a thread started by a bad joke, in a ng where said bad joke provides a substantial part of the noise. How can we possibly be past it?
From: Don Stockbauer on 8 Jul 2010 00:22 On Jul 7, 4:19 pm, BruceS <bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 6, 1:40 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 6, 9:28 am, BruceS <bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 5, 8:35 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 5, 9:33 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Jul 5, 7:28 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 7/5/2010 6:20 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote: > > > > > > > > On Jul 5, 5:40 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > >> On 7/5/2010 5:17 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote: > > > > > > > >>> On Jul 5, 5:00 pm, Aatu Koskensilta<aatu.koskensi...(a)uta.fi> wrote: > > > > > > >>>> Matt<30d...(a)net.net> writes: > > > > > > >>>>> The conditions at and type of death are irrelevant? > > > > > > > >>>> The conditions at and type of death of Cantor are quite relevant as far > > > > > > >>>> as the dangers of pondering imponderable infinities while clinically > > > > > > >>>> depressed are concerned, in so far as we regard a single data point as > > > > > > >>>> relevant. Mathematically speaking, it's of no consequence even if Cantor > > > > > > >>>> went mad and murdered all of Germany, by ferociously biting at their > > > > > > >>>> ankles while reciting Bacon, as an unfortunate result of too much > > > > > > >>>> mulling over infinite infinities of unspeakable character. > > > > > > > >>> You're exactly right. I mean, like it's of no consequence whatsoever > > > > > > >>> what happens here on the planet. If we all die it doesn't matter, > > > > > > >>> there's 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 other suns out to the > > > > > > >>> cosmological event horion, more beyond that, with gazillions of other > > > > > > >>> planets with intelligent life just waiting in line to fill in for us, > > > > > > >>> so we would not be missed in the least, even by us, after we > > > > > > >>> dissociate. > > > > > > > >> Finally, something more interesting than BURT. I do like the > > > > > > >> creativity that's in these two posts. 'Bout time! Who said > > > > > > >> reality matters? They were loco. > > > > > > > > Forward your concerns to General Chilton. > > > > > > > Based on what I wrote, he owes me! > > > > > > He may be hard for you to reach, there under Shy Ann Mountin, writhing > > > > > his hands with devilish plans for Humanity. But be persistent, you > > > > > may get through.- > > > > > "Writhing" doesn't sound quite right - insert some other word. > > > > ITYM "wringing" > > > Yes, yes, that's what he would be doing, that's the word. > > > Actually, again, a bad joke, I think we're past all that. > > We're posting in a thread started by a bad joke, in a ng where said > bad joke provides a substantial part of the noise. How can we > possibly be past it?- I meant Humanity is Shirley past what General Chilton would be wringing his hands over?
From: Don Stockbauer on 8 Jul 2010 09:31 On Jul 2, 3:52 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Einsteinian math can be used to define the speed of light limit in the > universe. > It is E=MC Squared and the Gamma factor but they are solved for C > instead. > > Factoring this Einsteinian math reveals a new mathematical truth of > the speed of light. > > Mitch Raemsch Better to just measure it. Science is all about measuring, right?
From: BruceS on 8 Jul 2010 14:01 On Jul 7, 10:22 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 7, 4:19 pm, BruceS <bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 6, 1:40 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 6, 9:28 am, BruceS <bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 5, 8:35 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Jul 5, 9:33 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 5, 7:28 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 7/5/2010 6:20 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Jul 5, 5:40 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> On 7/5/2010 5:17 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote: > > > > > > > > >>> On Jul 5, 5:00 pm, Aatu Koskensilta<aatu.koskensi...(a)uta.fi> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>> Matt<30d...(a)net.net> writes: > > > > > > > >>>>> The conditions at and type of death are irrelevant? > > > > > > > > >>>> The conditions at and type of death of Cantor are quite relevant as far > > > > > > > >>>> as the dangers of pondering imponderable infinities while clinically > > > > > > > >>>> depressed are concerned, in so far as we regard a single data point as > > > > > > > >>>> relevant. Mathematically speaking, it's of no consequence even if Cantor > > > > > > > >>>> went mad and murdered all of Germany, by ferociously biting at their > > > > > > > >>>> ankles while reciting Bacon, as an unfortunate result of too much > > > > > > > >>>> mulling over infinite infinities of unspeakable character. > > > > > > > > >>> You're exactly right. I mean, like it's of no consequence whatsoever > > > > > > > >>> what happens here on the planet. If we all die it doesn't matter, > > > > > > > >>> there's 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 other suns out to the > > > > > > > >>> cosmological event horion, more beyond that, with gazillions of other > > > > > > > >>> planets with intelligent life just waiting in line to fill in for us, > > > > > > > >>> so we would not be missed in the least, even by us, after we > > > > > > > >>> dissociate. > > > > > > > > >> Finally, something more interesting than BURT. I do like the > > > > > > > >> creativity that's in these two posts. 'Bout time! Who said > > > > > > > >> reality matters? They were loco. > > > > > > > > > Forward your concerns to General Chilton. > > > > > > > > Based on what I wrote, he owes me! > > > > > > > He may be hard for you to reach, there under Shy Ann Mountin, writhing > > > > > > his hands with devilish plans for Humanity. But be persistent, you > > > > > > may get through.- > > > > > > "Writhing" doesn't sound quite right - insert some other word. > > > > > ITYM "wringing" > > > > Yes, yes, that's what he would be doing, that's the word. > > > > Actually, again, a bad joke, I think we're past all that. > > > We're posting in a thread started by a bad joke, in a ng where said > > bad joke provides a substantial part of the noise. How can we > > possibly be past it?- > > I meant Humanity is Shirley past what General Chilton would be > wringing his hands over? Ah, context.
From: Don Stockbauer on 8 Jul 2010 16:48
On Jul 8, 1:01 pm, BruceS <bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 7, 10:22 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 7, 4:19 pm, BruceS <bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 6, 1:40 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 6, 9:28 am, BruceS <bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Jul 5, 8:35 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 5, 9:33 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Jul 5, 7:28 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 7/5/2010 6:20 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 5, 5:40 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> On 7/5/2010 5:17 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>> On Jul 5, 5:00 pm, Aatu Koskensilta<aatu.koskensi...(a)uta.fi> wrote: > > > > > > > > >>>> Matt<30d...(a)net.net> writes: > > > > > > > > >>>>> The conditions at and type of death are irrelevant? > > > > > > > > > >>>> The conditions at and type of death of Cantor are quite relevant as far > > > > > > > > >>>> as the dangers of pondering imponderable infinities while clinically > > > > > > > > >>>> depressed are concerned, in so far as we regard a single data point as > > > > > > > > >>>> relevant. Mathematically speaking, it's of no consequence even if Cantor > > > > > > > > >>>> went mad and murdered all of Germany, by ferociously biting at their > > > > > > > > >>>> ankles while reciting Bacon, as an unfortunate result of too much > > > > > > > > >>>> mulling over infinite infinities of unspeakable character. > > > > > > > > > >>> You're exactly right. I mean, like it's of no consequence whatsoever > > > > > > > > >>> what happens here on the planet. If we all die it doesn't matter, > > > > > > > > >>> there's 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 other suns out to the > > > > > > > > >>> cosmological event horion, more beyond that, with gazillions of other > > > > > > > > >>> planets with intelligent life just waiting in line to fill in for us, > > > > > > > > >>> so we would not be missed in the least, even by us, after we > > > > > > > > >>> dissociate. > > > > > > > > > >> Finally, something more interesting than BURT. I do like the > > > > > > > > >> creativity that's in these two posts. 'Bout time! Who said > > > > > > > > >> reality matters? They were loco. > > > > > > > > > > Forward your concerns to General Chilton. > > > > > > > > > Based on what I wrote, he owes me! > > > > > > > > He may be hard for you to reach, there under Shy Ann Mountin, writhing > > > > > > > his hands with devilish plans for Humanity. But be persistent, you > > > > > > > may get through.- > > > > > > > "Writhing" doesn't sound quite right - insert some other word. > > > > > > ITYM "wringing" > > > > > Yes, yes, that's what he would be doing, that's the word. > > > > > Actually, again, a bad joke, I think we're past all that. > > > > We're posting in a thread started by a bad joke, in a ng where said > > > bad joke provides a substantial part of the noise. How can we > > > possibly be past it?- > > > I meant Humanity is Shirley past what General Chilton would be > > wringing his hands over? > > Ah, context. Yes. Also Reference. |