Spyware Blaster Database Updated 3|12|2010
in [Spyware]
|
From: ~BD~ on 17 Mar 2010 12:33 SeaNymph wrote: > I believe faith is a private and personal matter. I'll not argue with you about that. > I also believe that you are a liar ... Believe whatever you wish, it will not change the facts. > and incapable of answering a direct question. I will, and do, answer reasonable questions from anyone. -- Dave
From: Jenn on 17 Mar 2010 13:09 Aardvark wrote: > On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:25:29 -0400, SeaNymph wrote: > >> You've >> been banned, yet have freely chosen to stay. Why? > > What a sheltered life you must have led, to be totally unfamiliar > with the concept of one doing something for no other reason that the > fact that one *can* do it. :D (it takes an aardvark to understand..) -- Jenn (from Oklahoma) http://pqlr.org/bbs/
From: SeaNymph on 17 Mar 2010 13:17 Always the qualifier. That's a sure sign of someone who cannot answer direct questions. "~BD~" <BoaterDave.is.(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:1s6dnYLrfMXXmTzWnZ2dnUVZ8oqdnZ2d(a)bt.com... > SeaNymph wrote: > >> I believe faith is a private and personal matter. > > I'll not argue with you about that. > >> I also believe that you are a liar ... > > Believe whatever you wish, it will not change the facts. > >> and incapable of answering a direct question. > > I will, and do, answer reasonable questions from anyone. > > -- > Dave
From: ~BD~ on 17 Mar 2010 13:54 SeaNymph wrote: > Always the qualifier. That's a sure sign of someone who cannot answer > direct questions. I can, and *do* answer direct questions! May I refer you here: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3CXbydnXSyYLFqCwPWnZ2dnUVZ8hudnZ2d%40bt.com%3E This was in answer to direct questions from Mr David Kaye in the 'microsoft.public.security.public' group in the thread entitled "The Tirades". It turned out to be quite a good exchange - IMO. -- Dave - David Kaye is known as 'Honest Dave' - a kindred spirit! :)
From: Bullwinkle on 17 Mar 2010 17:31
She has to 'approve' all registrations one her little bitty web forum. That is a control freak. Double standard. "SeaNymph" <SeaNympy(a)deepbluesea.com> wrote in message news:hnqs9d$cdm$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... Why do you complain? You maintain an account there, even though the owner has made it perfectly clear that you are not welcome. The man owns the server and has every right to maintain whatever agenda suits him. Everybody knows that and either abides by that or goes elsewhere. You've been banned, yet have freely chosen to stay. Why? "Jenn" <me(a)nowhere.whocareswhatthisemailisanyway> wrote in message news:hnqnaf$ok1$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > SeaNymph wrote: >> You post like someone who thinks big brother is out to get you. > > naa ... it's just the reality of power, even pseudo-power, being combined > with human nature. > >> You ignore the reality of the situation, > > nope ... wrong again. > >> that being that AC is a privately owned server, > > ergo.. my previous comment, > " It's air with people trying to control >>>>> it for the sake of pushing their own personal agenda's. I bought >>>>> my own piece of air space ... ain't it grand that we all can have >>>>> our own piece of the pie .. free speech and all. You say >>>>> potaaaato .. and I say potaahto ... AOL/*AC*/Ahuma are all just >>>>> tiny pieces of air in a huge sky.... " > >> giving that owner the right to do whatever they see fit. > > ergo .. my previous comment, > ">> It's all about whose got the hammer - the power in the little AC >>> kingdom. You're gagged on AC and like dogs on ..... if you get out >>> of line they yank on the leash to get you back into line again. If >>> that doesn't work they threaten you .. they threaten to take away >>> the group .. Oh.. but if and when people back off and say "yah >>> siree... we were being bad.. we'll behave".. they get their jollies >>> from that and sit back and think they are in control.. and you know >>> what? They *are* in control as long as there are people who allow >>> themselves to be controlled by people who believe they have power. AC is >>> no different than any other miniature dictatorship, and it's >>> all just air... it's space bought and paid for by the people who >>> yank you're leashes." > > > -- > Jenn (from Oklahoma) > http://pqlr.org/bbs/ > > > > >> "Jenn" <nope(a)noway.atnohow.anyday> wrote in message >> news:hnpf61$jth$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> SeaNymph wrote: >>>> You are some crazy conspiracy theorist. You yourself were banned >>>> and most of us are well aware of why that happened. Yet, you >>>> maintain a bogus account so you can continue to read groups in AC. What >>>> a joke! >>> >>> >>> and... you're point is?? >>> >>> It's all about whose got the hammer - the power in the little AC >>> kingdom. You're gagged on AC and like dogs on ..... if you get out >>> of line they yank on the leash to get you back into line again. If >>> that doesn't work they threaten you .. they threaten to take away >>> the group .. Oh.. but if and when people back off and say "yah >>> siree... we were being bad.. we'll behave".. they get their jollies >>> from that and sit back and think they are in control.. and you know >>> what? They *are* in control as long as there are people who allow >>> themselves to be controlled by people who believe they have power. AC is >>> no different than any other miniature dictatorship, and it's >>> all just air... it's space bought and paid for by the people who >>> yank you're leashes. You seem to think it's a shameful thing to be >>> banned from AC... that >>> couldn't be further from reality. You get banned when you speak >>> your mind there... you get banned if you don't submit to being >>> under someone elses pseudo-authority... you get banned if you don't >>> *take* the punishment they deem you deserve and then come back to >>> them all apologetic. Well... I sort of think it takes more guts to >>> stand up and be banned for speaking ones mind than it does to sit >>> and submit to them all the while whinning and complaining and >>> mumbling to everyone else about how aweful the admin is doing >>> everyone. Now, that's what I call being weak minded.... -- >>> Jenn (from Oklahoma) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> "Jenn" <nope(a)noway.atnohow.anyday> wrote in message >>>> news:hnp4h6$knt$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>>> Peter Foldes wrote: >>>>>> BD >>>>>> >>>>>> Just to add >>>>>> >>>>>> Why were you banned from AOL,Annexcafe,Ahuma and why are you posts >>>>>> deleted off the MS servers. The latter is just the iceberg of >>>>>> organizations' and groups that have banned you. >>>>> >>>>> I hate to tell you this, but being banned from space on the >>>>> internet isn't a big deal. It's air with people trying to control >>>>> it for the sake of pushing their own personal agenda's. I bought >>>>> my own piece of air space ... ain't it grand that we all can have >>>>> our own piece of the pie .. free speech and all. You say >>>>> potaaaato .. and I say potaahto ... AOL/AC/Ahuma are all just >>>>> tiny pieces of air in a huge sky.... that would make anyone >>>>> boasting that they haven't been banned from a tiny pc of air look a >>>>> bit silly, pretty much. Who >>>>> cares? There's always more air space a person can go out an >>>>> purchase. >>>>>> Can you explain to us why and why are they at fault and in you own >>>>>> observation why these things happen. >>>>> >>>>> Well.. I sure can explain it. There are people out there who >>>>> fancy themselves to be in control (control freaks) of the air >>>>> space and when people come along who aren't butt kissers, a clash >>>>> begins to take place between the people who fancy themselves as >>>>> being 'in control' of the air space and those who aren't 'butt >>>>> kissers'. The clash often results in the control freaks >>>>> attempting to banish those who "disobeyed" the rules written on >>>>> the wind and often times hope that those who are banished will >>>>> take it as a sign that they have been 'bad'. The expectation is >>>>> that such a banned person will reign in their >>>>> disobedient self and take their punishment like adults.. BECAUSE >>>>> ... of course (said with sarcasm) the control freaks deem that the >>>>> person deserves punishment, which is banishment from the group. Now, >>>>> the problem with that scenario is that control freaks can't >>>>> get their "fix" off of the punishment they tried to impose unless >>>>> the banish-ee is seen to be humbled and somehow repents for their >>>>> "obvious" transgressions against the control freaks group. IF, they >>>>> don't take their punishment to heart, then, of course, the control >>>>> freaks must make sure they let everyone else know just how BAD the >>>>> banish-ee is because many people don't have the ability to think >>>>> for themselves and prefer someone else to think for them... ergo >>>>> ... they just do what their control freak management tells them to do >>>>> because it's easy and comfy that way. Weaks minds actually need >>>>> the control freaks to coddle them that way. Are you following me >>>>> so far? -- >>>>> Jenn (from Oklahoma) > > > |