Subatomic Particle Mass/Stability Spectrum
in [Physics]
|
From: Robert L. Oldershaw on 15 May 2010 13:30 On May 15, 12:06 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote: > > Ah, Bob - "Al.Rivero" is asking for numbers. Talking the talk is > easy, professionals and crackpots. If you are a scientist you must > walk the walk - provide numbers or doable experiments. > > As you have no experiments, post the numbers. If you have no numbers, > you have no theory. -------------------------------------------- You could start educating yourself with http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1002/1002.1078.pdf and then there is http://arxiv.org/a/oldershaw_r_1 Alejandro has the latest mass/stability graph, why don't you? Ineptitude? By the way I do not discuss science with uncouth, racist, misanthropic pigs like you. RLO
From: leucipo2001 on 16 May 2010 17:43 On 15 mayo, 03:39, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu> wrote: > On May 14, 8:07 pm, "Al.Riv...(a)gmail.com" <al.riv...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > You have devoted your career to the substandard paradigm and the > dubious attempts to rescue it with string theory, supersymmetry, loopy > quantum field theory, multiverses, anthropic unreasoning, etc., > etc., ... I will not critiquise you by using an unscientific (nor to say ad- hominen) argument because I myself have listed two. But your ad-hominen guess is, in this particular case, a bad guess. You could have checked simply by looking to my webpage. http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/ perhaps you did and got mislead by the first line, instead of checking the kind of research I have devoted my career to. You can call names for my career path in a lot of ways, but not about following what you call the "substandard paradigm".
From: Androcles on 16 May 2010 18:02 "leucipo2001" <al.rivero(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:a293ccc3-ebeb-4437-a193-9779dc43c445(a)u7g2000vbq.googlegroups.com... On 15 mayo, 03:39, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu> wrote: > On May 14, 8:07 pm, "Al.Riv...(a)gmail.com" <al.riv...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > You have devoted your career to the substandard paradigm and the > dubious attempts to rescue it with string theory, supersymmetry, loopy > quantum field theory, multiverses, anthropic unreasoning, etc., > etc., ... I will not critiquise you =========================================== I will criticise you for attempting to use English incorrectly. An American may criticize. That is my critique.
From: Al.Rivero on 17 May 2010 10:48 On 17 mayo, 12:50, "hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote: > You have your pov about things & I have mine... I really would prefer not. To have a point of view is very like to have an opinion. I feel not very happy with posmodernism. > On 17 mayo, 03:01, "hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote: > > But, I see nothing really new in neither Al's or Rob's ejaculates. My point. I was telling that there was nothing new ;-) > > And then there are also equations that possibly go back to > > the 1930s, describing m_e and m_p in terms of fundamental > > physical constants, with Kerr- & Schwarzschild properties, etc. > > that will link the mass spectrum to fundamental units like: > > > m_p = [c^2/2G]*[sqrt(hG/(2pi*c^3)]*[I_H/(f_L*F)]*(3*pi^2)*sqrt(2a) > > m_e = [c^2/G] * [sqrt(hG/(2pi*c^3)] * [1/(f_L*F)] * a*pi*sqrt(3)/3 > > Al wondered and wrote: > > back to 1930? I see you are careful with the references > and you have located the 6 pi5 micropaper; I wonder which > is the oldest reference you have for this kind of spectrum. > > hanson wrote: > > ahahaha... keep wondering, Al, or find out for yourself, Actually this option is not possible, I was asking the oldest reference *you* have. > take it or leave it... Four easy choices for a dude like > you... ahahahaha... I am here for fun and not looking > for a job... Nobody is looking for one, as far as I can see. And this is fun. > hanson to Oldershaw, wrote: > > why don't you also check into the "Alpha Cascade", a step > > wise phenomena in nature that sets crucial energy levels > > always apart by a factor of === a^2/2 === from > > Al Rivero wondered: > McGregor, you mean, do you? > > hanson wrote: > > ahaha.... So, you went googling for the Alpha cascade > and then, you even confused physics with bio-chem... bio-chem? No, I thought you were calling Alpha cascade to a sequence of energy levels spaced by some power of the fine energy constant, alpha. This is old work from McGregor. > Good one, Al... ahaha... Thanks for the laughs!... Glad to serve. Yours, Alejandro
From: Robert L. Oldershaw on 17 May 2010 12:16
On May 17, 4:07 am, "Al.Riv...(a)gmail.com" <al.riv...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Please give me a list of the MASSES of the most stable D and B particles that you wish to understand, and I will see if my formalism is able to say something about how to explain those masses. PS: You should see the refined graph based on M = ([sqrt j{j+1}/a]) (674.8 MeV)! It is extraordinary. Send me an email, and I will attach a pdf. Best, RLO www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw |