From: Ethan Mao on 16 Dec 2009 23:48 i found this error in syslog when i check the cisco 6509 today. "Nov 7 08:52:28: %MISTRAL-3-ERROR: Error condition detected: TM_DATA_PARITY_ERROR" this appears only one time, and i checked the cisco.com, and found this explanation: "The most common errors from the Mistral ASIC on the MSFC are TM_DATA_PARITY_ERROR, SYSDRAM_PARITY_ERROR, SYSAD_PARITY_ERROR, and TM_NPP_PARITY_ERROR. Possible causes of these parity errors are random static discharge or other external factors." has anyone had come across this error before? do i have to do anything except monitoring the switch syslog to confirm whether the error message was an isolated one?
From: bod43 on 17 Dec 2009 14:47 On 17 Dec, 04:48, Ethan Mao <maoyix...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > i found this error in syslog when i check the cisco 6509 today. > > "Nov 7 08:52:28: %MISTRAL-3-ERROR: Error condition detected: > TM_DATA_PARITY_ERROR" > > this appears only one time, and i checked the cisco.com, and found > this explanation: > "The most common errors from the Mistral ASIC on the MSFC are > TM_DATA_PARITY_ERROR, > SYSDRAM_PARITY_ERROR, SYSAD_PARITY_ERROR, and TM_NPP_PARITY_ERROR. > Possible causes of these parity errors are random static discharge or > other external factors." > > has anyone had come across this error before? do i have to do anything > except monitoring the switch syslog to confirm whether the error > message was an isolated one? I wouldn't be concerned unless the message was repeated.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: want to buy SPA-4XOC3-POS-V2 today Next: PIX minimal setup for pinging out the inside |