Taking a Fresh Look at the Physics of Radiometers.
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Come on creative minds solve this fiasco in the Gulf of Mexico if ?you can
Next: Dark Energy: The problem with Einstein's Cosmological Constant is that there's no physics behind it
From: J. Clarke on 15 Jun 2010 08:17 On 6/15/2010 6:30 AM, kado(a)nventure.com wrote: > On Jun 12, 1:27 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 6/11/10 11:27 PM, k...(a)nventure.com wrote: >> > snip.. >> >>> So please just tell me which twin is younger than the other. >> >> The twin that experienced the accelerations is the younger of the >> two when they are back together. See: The Twin Paradox: The Spacetime >> Diagram Analysis. >> > > You still have not answered my question. > You just responded with a bunch of mainline BS. > > Just tell me if the twin who took the trip is younger than the stay-at- > home > twin, or if the twin that stayed at home is younger than his/her > sibling. Flunked remedial reading did you?
From: Tim BandTech.com on 15 Jun 2010 09:22 On Jun 11, 11:26 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Jun 11, 2:24 pm, "Tim BandTech.com" <tttppp...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > Dear Tim: Light isn't different things determined by "wave length" (a > misnomer). The determining factors of the energy of the light is how What is the spetrometer measuring then? Also, do you have light polarization worked out? - Tim > closely the standard size photons are spaced apart, and how many > trains of photons are arriving. The materials hit by light respond to > the frequency of the impacts, at valance levels within the atoms which > correspond to each particular frequency. The photons which get > "reflected" (re emitted) are never the same photons. There are no > sine curves relative to light, because light isn't waves. It's just > high speed tangles of ether too small to be able to give off photons. > Gamma rays started out like photons. But because of the very high > energies of emission, tended to gain additional ether in transit, > until the mass got great enough to emit occasional photons. Gamma > rays straddle the fence between energy and mass. > > I laugh hearing that some suppose photons (mass-less) carry additional > energy in their spin. If anyone thinks so, they must have better > measuring devices than I know about. In addition to the hundreds of > descriptions of my New Science, here, I have several dozen, as yet > unpublished, essays on the physics of light. There are no equations. > I'll leave those to others to write. NoEinstein
From: NoEinstein on 15 Jun 2010 10:58 On Jun 15, 6:30 am, "k...(a)nventure.com" <k...(a)nventure.com> wrote: > Dear Kado: If you ask Sam anything, you aren't getting a reliable source for the answer. "Time travel", unfortunately, doesn't happen. But mechanical, atomic, and biological mechanisms will slow down, slightly, from the flowing ether, front-to-back, through a plane or spaceship. The effect on the traveling twin, could be a more youthful 'look', compared to the Earth twin. But both would be the same chronological age (birth order accepted), NoEinstein > > On Jun 12, 1:27 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 6/11/10 11:27 PM, k...(a)nventure.com wrote: > > snip.. > > > > So please just tell me which twin is younger than the other. > > > The twin that experienced the accelerations is the younger of the > > two when they are back together. See: The Twin Paradox: The Spacetime > > Diagram Analysis. > > You still have not answered my question. > You just responded with a bunch of mainline BS. > > Just tell me if the twin who took the trip is younger than the stay-at- > home > twin, or if the twin that stayed at home is younger than his/her > sibling. > > D.Y.K.
From: NoEinstein on 15 Jun 2010 11:01 On Jun 15, 8:17 am, "J. Clarke" <jclarke.use...(a)cox.net> wrote: > Dear J. Clark: ... and your areas of perfection are? NoEinstein > > On 6/15/2010 6:30 AM, k...(a)nventure.com wrote: > > > On Jun 12, 1:27 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 6/11/10 11:27 PM, k...(a)nventure.com wrote: > > > snip.. > > >>> So please just tell me which twin is younger than the other. > > >> The twin that experienced the accelerations is the younger of the > >> two when they are back together. See: The Twin Paradox: The Spacetime > >> Diagram Analysis. > > > You still have not answered my question. > > You just responded with a bunch of mainline BS. > > > Just tell me if the twin who took the trip is younger than the stay-at- > > home > > twin, or if the twin that stayed at home is younger than his/her > > sibling. > > Flunked remedial reading did you?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: NoEinstein on 15 Jun 2010 11:26
On Jun 15, 9:22 am, "Tim BandTech.com" <tttppp...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Dear Tim: That's what I like: Intelligent questions! The angle that lenses and prisms bend light (to make the colored spectral bands) is determined by the internal recovery rate of the valance rings, which are in harmony the each particular frequency of the arriving photons. Because blue light has the photons arriving closer together, the valance rings have less time to recover, before the next photon arrives. So, those photons, which are in the more energetic trains, pass through the glass with less total refraction than, say, red light. It's all determined by the recovery times inside the glass, NOT by the velocity of a given photon! Polarized light takes advantage of the fact that the photons, or clusters of polar IOTAs (the smallest energy units of the ether) are like flying Frisbies. At low incidences of reflection, the photons skip (or are re emitted as though they had skipped) like flat rocks over a smooth pond. Those same flat photons won't pass through perpendicular polarizing filters, because they are wider than they are flat. Please note that it isn't necessary to consider the light to be... "waves" in order for these things to happen. NoEinstein > > On Jun 11, 11:26 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Jun 11, 2:24 pm, "Tim BandTech.com" <tttppp...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Dear Tim: Light isn't different things determined by "wave length" (a > > misnomer). The determining factors of the energy of the light is how > > What is the spetrometer measuring then? > > Also, do you have light polarization worked out? > > - Tim > > > > > closely the standard size photons are spaced apart, and how many > > trains of photons are arriving. The materials hit by light respond to > > the frequency of the impacts, at valance levels within the atoms which > > correspond to each particular frequency. The photons which get > > "reflected" (re emitted) are never the same photons. There are no > > sine curves relative to light, because light isn't waves. It's just > > high speed tangles of ether too small to be able to give off photons. > > Gamma rays started out like photons. But because of the very high > > energies of emission, tended to gain additional ether in transit, > > until the mass got great enough to emit occasional photons. Gamma > > rays straddle the fence between energy and mass. > > > I laugh hearing that some suppose photons (mass-less) carry additional > > energy in their spin. If anyone thinks so, they must have better > > measuring devices than I know about. In addition to the hundreds of > > descriptions of my New Science, here, I have several dozen, as yet > > unpublished, essays on the physics of light. There are no equations. > > I'll leave those to others to write. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - |