The End Is Near
in [Microsoft Office]
|
From: Mr Baracuda on 5 May 2010 14:30 it's a miracle that they were actually able to take that buggy horrible code and streamline it enough to make windows7 actually usable! Of course it needed more effort and man hours that building the great pyramid but they were under the whip of Balmer... "Code slaves, Code!!!!! <sound of whip lashing>... or microsoft is going down with all you in it!" "Greg Russell" <grussell(a)example.con> wrote in message news:84cbueFt0hU1(a)mid.individual.net... > In news:4be0b361(a)news.x-privat.org, > Mr Baracuda <baracuda(a)slim.ws> typed: > >> so we have a limited time to insult vista ..... > > M$ Vista was named as one of "The Top Ten Technological Disasters of the > 21st Century" (so far, at least) in a recent Yahoo! news article, voted as > such by the overwhelming majority of computing and technology news editors > in the world that contributed to the vote. > >
From: Gordon on 10 May 2010 02:52 "Ben M. Schorr, MVP" <bens(a)bogusaddress.mvp> wrote in message news:#AEjSS77KHA.1316(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Please cite an example of Microsoft censoring a post in the forums for > propaganda reasons. > Don't know about propaganda, but I posted THREE responses to the same post with a website containing a solution to a question on whether it was possible to install an Upgrade version of Windows 7 without a qualifying version of Windows being present and ALL THREE were deleted arbitrarily by a certain "MVP" "Moderator"....
From: Bob I on 10 May 2010 09:05 Gordon wrote: > > "Ben M. Schorr, MVP" <bens(a)bogusaddress.mvp> wrote in message > news:#AEjSS77KHA.1316(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > >> Please cite an example of Microsoft censoring a post in the forums for >> propaganda reasons. >> > > Don't know about propaganda, but I posted THREE responses to the same > post with a website containing a solution to a question on whether it > was possible to install an Upgrade version of Windows 7 without a > qualifying version of Windows being present and ALL THREE were deleted > arbitrarily by a certain "MVP" "Moderator".... Seems that "solution" would be implicitly promoting a violation of the licensing agreement. I don't think that constitutes "arbitrary", does it?
From: Tom Willett on 10 May 2010 09:29 "Bob I" <birelan(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:%23OgUIGE8KHA.1316(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... : : : Seems that "solution" would be implicitly promoting a violation of the : licensing agreement. I don't think that constitutes "arbitrary", does it? People are going to be shocked at how much will be deleted in the forums.
From: Gordon on 10 May 2010 09:43
"Bob I" <birelan(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:#OgUIGE8KHA.1316(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > Seems that "solution" would be implicitly promoting a violation of the > licensing agreement. So it may . That's a very grey area. Surely it was firstly up to the Op to use his/her conscience, and secondly, but most importantly the "mvp moderator" should have posted REASONS why it possibly violated the licensing agreement - and not just arbitrarily delete posts..... |