From: BURT on 11 Nov 2009 22:03 On Nov 11, 11:42 am, DW <h38...(a)dcemail.com> wrote: > On Nov 11, 8:10 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > On Nov 1, 12:20 pm, "Riaper" wrote:> "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light" > > > >< Since the conclusion that the velocity of light was constant in all reference frames is based on observation, the necessity of understanding the methodology of measuring the > > > velocity of light should be apparent to all who would deal with > > relativistic phenomena. > > > > That the velocity of light is constant in all reference frames was > > NOT "based on" observations; it was POSTULATED by Einstein and > > verified later. > > wrong, the velocity of light cannot be > measured by definition and else > > at best you measure time, which cant be > done neither, but only ordered sequence > of pulses, which are events > > rest of misconceptions mercifully snipped Its always the speed of light. We don't need to include a direction in its measurement. Mitch Raemsch
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: The REAL reason they hate Einstein. Next: Two clocks; one moving past the other at high speed |