The Jon Banquer Blog Is Getting A Face Lift
in [SolidWorks]
|
Prev: Screw and nut animation
Next: Add-in activation
From: Batman on 22 Sep 2009 03:11 On Sep 20, 9:24 pm, Haywood JaBlowme <haywoodjablow...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > I've never really had any interest in the look of my blog but now that > the Jon Banquer blog is so successful and has so much content it's not > like I really have any choice so I'm going to put the time and effort > into finally making the Jon Banquer blog look nice. I've already > started cleaning up the look and feel. > > http://jonbanquer.wordpress.com/ > > 2010 is going to be the year that many more machinists / CADCAM > programmers figure out that direct modeling is a much better and a > much smarter choice than history based modeling and it's my intention > to devote time to these new tools that I feel will replace history > based modeling tools like SolidWorks, Pro-E, etc. > > It will be interesting to see if SpaceClaim and Solid Edge with ST can > stay at the front of this technology. It will also be interesting to > see if old products like Cadkey now KeyCreator and CoCreate can be > successfully retooled to offer the kind of productive user interface > that SpaceClaim has with its Push/Pull/Move concept of modeling. > Already, CoCreate has started to try and implement a good part of what > SpaceClaim offers. Unfortunately it doesn't look anywhere near as > clean to me when I view the upcoming release videos on You Tube. > > It's only a matter of time before many more job shops realize that > history based modeling isn't the right tool and that more powerful > direct modeling tools represent the future while history based > modeling represent a dead end. > > Jon Banquer > San Diego, CAhttp://jonbanquer.wordpress.com/ Dude, quite frankly you have become a broken record. I must agree that direct modeling is only a way to hack into history based modeling and has very few uses. Plase get a grip. Parametrics can only work in a history and managable environment.
From: Cliff on 22 Sep 2009 03:58 On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:24:17 -0700 (PDT), Haywood JaBlowme <haywoodjablowme3(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >I've never really had any interest in the look of my blog but now that >the Jon Banquer blog is so successful and has so much content it's not >like I really have any choice so I'm going to put the time and effort >into finally making the Jon Banquer blog look nice. I've already >started cleaning up the look and feel. After: http://www.blogacause.com/blogacause/resources/actanonverba/pig-lipstick.jpg
From: Cliff on 22 Sep 2009 08:01 On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:30:31 -0700, "Stupendous Man" <spam(a)trap.com> wrote: > >>Now *that* is funny stuff right there. 50 hits in a week, and Jon >>thinks he has a "successful" blog. Now that your definition of >>"success" has been clearly outlined, I can see why you would define >>your current situation in life as "successful". > >People like to look at car crashes and the mentally challenged, too. Poor clueless is so clueless it's usually funny. Did you follow his problems with drilling holes with MasterCAM? And remember that he's been posing as a MasterCAM expert for about a decade? What a hoot. He never knew the larger holes were larger than the smaller ones .... He never thought of checking. He never wondered why it worked just fine for everyone else. He never bothered to look at the instructions. He never bothered to look at his claimed screen &active menus/data entry fields. He never bothered to ask co-worker. Clearly he never watched those claimed videos he claimed he bought. He's not even a beginner user. IF even that (which I doubt). -- Cliff
From: Haywood JaBlowme on 22 Sep 2009 08:34 On Sep 22, 12:11 am, Batman <michaels...(a)msn.com> wrote: > Dude, quite frankly you have become a broken record. I must agree that > direct modeling is only a way to hack into history based modeling and > has very few uses. You're clueless, Mike. History based modeling is a dead end and Siemens knows it. Suggest you get clue one and read what Dan Staples, Siemens lead developer for Solid Edge, has to say rather than continuing to make yourself look like an idiot. PTC also knows how limited history based modeling is and their saying it with their marketing of CoCreate.
From: Joe788 on 22 Sep 2009 10:49
On Sep 22, 5:34 am, Haywood JaBlowme <haywoodjablow...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Sep 22, 12:11 am, Batman <michaels...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > Dude, quite frankly you have become a broken record. I must agree that > > direct modeling is only a way to hack into history based modeling and > > has very few uses. > > You're clueless, Mike. History based modeling is a dead end and > Siemens knows it. Suggest you get clue one and read what Dan Staples, > Siemens lead developer for Solid Edge, has to say rather than > continuing to make yourself look like an idiot. > > PTC also knows how limited history based modeling is and their saying > it with their marketing of CoCreate. Another outstanding Banquer prediction. You mean a company that's trying to sell a direct modeling product, is claiming direct modeling is the only way to go? Wow! Who woulda thunk it? Thanks for that terrific info, Captain Press Release. This is almost as funny as your prediction of machining becoming a backyard "machine-in-a-shed" industry because there isn't enough work to support high end equipment. |