Prev: A critique of Einstein’s 1920 lecture on the ether.
Next: Proton Smaller Than Thought—May Rewrite Laws of Physics
From: oriel36 on 8 Jul 2010 08:46 On Jul 8, 12:57 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/7/10 6:32 PM, oriel36 wrote: > > > On Jul 7, 9:32 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dutch investigation supports key warnings from the IPCC's most recent > >> assessment > > >>http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=facts-climate-report.... > > > Maybe someday scientists will discover that they haven't even > > understood the basic temperature fluctuations across the solstices > > properly,in other words,they don't understand what causes the seasons > > and why the seasons and distinct from global climate. > > > All these reviews mean nothing Sam,only the explanation which exposes > > the unstable core of these predictive/modelling agendas make a > > difference with this fuss over a minor atmospheric gas being merely a > > symptom of the parent errors and distortions. > > Gerald--Here is a primmer for you on atmospheric modeling. > Principles of Planetary Climate" by R. T. Pierrehumbert > http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~rtp1/ClimateBook/ClimateVol1.pdf All these guys are happy out with strenuous convictions and denials surrounding a minor atmospheric gas but not a single participant in any one of these forums or in the public arena can tell you why temperatures fluctuate massively at different latitudes between the solstices. All these solemn reports of vindication for climate scientists and their agenda that humans have control over global temperatures must seem appealing to those who dwell at that non technical level opinion,even the concept itself is so ridiculous that it says more about the standard of intelligence of the people opposing it than it does those who are fully sure carbon dioxide acts as a global temperature dial. You get nothing for commenting on a low level of intelligence that compromises the concerns of people here as climate,as a topic,hasn't even begun yet let alone driving people into a frenzy over carbon dioxide.I know this because nobody has affirmed what causes the seasons and what answer is proposed in terms of 'tilt' is not worth considering.
From: oriel36 on 8 Jul 2010 14:59 On Jul 8, 12:57 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/7/10 6:32 PM, oriel36 wrote: > > > On Jul 7, 9:32 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dutch investigation supports key warnings from the IPCC's most recent > >> assessment > > >>http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=facts-climate-report.... > > > Maybe someday scientists will discover that they haven't even > > understood the basic temperature fluctuations across the solstices > > properly,in other words,they don't understand what causes the seasons > > and why the seasons and distinct from global climate. > > > All these reviews mean nothing Sam,only the explanation which exposes > > the unstable core of these predictive/modelling agendas make a > > difference with this fuss over a minor atmospheric gas being merely a > > symptom of the parent errors and distortions. > > Gerald--Here is a primmer for you on atmospheric modeling. > Principles of Planetary Climate" by R. T. Pierrehumbert > http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~rtp1/ClimateBook/ClimateVol1.pdf You know Sam,I had used the fictional narrative of Orwell's '1984' frequently over the past few weeks to convey the ability to live in an atmosphere of fear based on nothing more than squeezing global temperatures into a minor gas and more importantly,to trace the origins of these prediction/modelling agendas on nothing more than a few well placed lies and an enormous antecedent error based on rotation of the earth through 360 degrees.There is another fictional narrative that may be more appropriate in isolating a type of personality that has always existed,only this time that 'empirical' personality is now dominant on the world stage,that narrative is by Jonathan Swift - "These people are under continual disquietudes, never enjoying a minutes peace of mind; and their disturbances proceed from causes which very little affect the rest of mortals. Their apprehensions arise from several changes they dread in the celestial bodies: for instance, that the earth, by the continual approaches of the sun towards it, must, in course of time, be absorbed, or swallowed up; that the face of the sun, will, by degrees, be encrusted with its own effluvia, and give no more light to the world; that the earth very narrowly escaped a brush from the tail of the last comet, which would have infallibly reduced it to ashes; and that the next, which they have calculated for one-and-thirty years hence, will probably destroy us. For if, in its perihelion, it should approach within a certain degree of the sun (as by their calculations they have reason to dread) it will receive a degree of heat ten thousand times more intense than that of red hot glowing iron, and in its absence from the sun, carry a blazing tail ten hundred thousand and fourteen miles long, through which, if the earth should pass at the distance of one hundred thousand miles from the nucleus, or main body of the comet, it must in its passage be set on fire, and reduced to ashes: that the sun, daily spending its rays without any nutriment to supply them, will at last be wholly consumed and annihilated; which must be attended with the destruction of this earth, and of all the planets that receive their light from it. They are so perpetually alarmed with the apprehensions of these, and the like impending dangers, that they can neither sleep quietly in their beds, nor have any relish for the common pleasures and amusements of life. When they meet an acquaintance in the morning, the first question is about the sun's health, how he looked at his setting and rising, and what hopes they have to avoid the stroke of the approaching comet. This conversation they are apt to run into with the same temper that boys discover in delighting to hear terrible stories of spirits and hobgoblins, which they greedily listen to, and dare not go to bed for fear." Gulliver's travels I do like Orwell's commentary which most applies here to those pursuing the predictions/modelling agendas without bothering to consider anything other than the conclusion at hand,something which began with Isaac Newton - "...to forget, whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again, and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself -- that was the ultimate subtlety; consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the word 'doublethink' involved the use of doublethink." Orwell 1984 All these fictional narratives are renowned not just for the story wrapped around the narrative but the type of personalities which naturally pursue an ideology as it fits their outlook.
From: Sam Wormley on 8 Jul 2010 19:36 On 7/8/10 7:46 AM, oriel36 wrote: > All these solemn reports of vindication for climate scientists and > their agenda that humans have control over global temperatures Obviously human's have lost control (as if they ever had it) of the global temperature. We, as a species, are in for quite a change, even if the sun remains dormant for many decades. Do you keep up on the scientific news, Gerald?
From: Sam Wormley on 8 Jul 2010 19:42
On 7/8/10 1:59 PM, oriel36 wrote: > You know Sam,I had used the fictional narrative of Orwell's '1984' > frequently over the past few weeks to convey the ability to live in an > atmosphere of fear based on nothing more than squeezing global > temperatures into a minor gas and more importantly,to trace the > origins of these prediction/modelling agendas on nothing more than a > few well placed lies and an enormous antecedent error based on > rotation of the earth through 360 degrees. I hate to say this, Gerald, but the art and science climatology is way more complex that you are admitting to yourself. Look at the forcing functions of "minor" gasses. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bb/Radiative-forcings.svg/1000px-Radiative-forcings.svg.png |