Prev: AI Methodologies was Re: The stalker problem was Re: The Collapseof the wave function was Re: Avatars was Re: Bandwidth was Re: The WOW wasRe: Your magic cubicle was Re: Paging Cpt. Nemo was Re: Time Travel Vacationswas Re: Pretending was Re: Multi-
Next: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 25 Jun 2010 Washington, DC
From: guskz on 27 Jun 2010 14:22

Science knows that two particles attract yet REMAIN separate from the
other.

------------
Permitting my perception, that remainder seems to be an act of
repulsion (thus both a force of attraction accompanied by a force of
repulsion at closer distance).
------------

Science knows that photons do not remain separate and that photons
(virtual) cause particles to attract or repulse. Laser beams are less
likely in space, then multi-directional light waves. Can photons
actually occupy the very same space and how many photons can occupy a
plank length.

Since photons are also particles, would two strong solar winds
collide, likewise high-intensity laser light-beams.

We know that virtual photons dis-integrate to form particles...thus
form charges that in turn exchange virtual photons (their very
substance) with other charges.

--------------------------

What can be formulated from the above, is that what is emitted is also
what is contained to simulate particle. In such a "matter", the micro-
eye would see contained light(micro-star) emitting light.

In our quantum micro-view, science has established that there is two
unique micro-stars, one larger than the other, and both of higher
dynamics that disregard Newtonian law meaning their forces are not-
proportional to their sizes.

Yet Newtonian law (force of gravity per distance^2) is also a field
law, and these two micro-stars being micro-viewed as two fields must
somehow adhere to this law even though they show to be breaking
it.......













From: BURT on 27 Jun 2010 14:35
On Jun 27, 11:22 am, guskz <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> Science knows that two particles attract yet REMAIN separate from the
> other.

The electron and proton are repulsive instead.

Mitch Raemsch
>
> ------------
> Permitting my perception, that remainder seems to be an act of
> repulsion (thus both a force of attraction accompanied by a force of
> repulsion at closer distance).
> ------------
>
> Science knows that photons do not remain separate and that photons
> (virtual) cause particles to attract or repulse. Laser beams are less
> likely in space, then multi-directional light waves. Can photons
> actually occupy the very same space and how many photons can occupy a
> plank length.
>
> Since photons are also particles, would two strong solar winds
> collide, likewise high-intensity laser light-beams.
>
> We know that virtual photons dis-integrate to form particles...thus
> form charges that in turn exchange virtual photons (their very
> substance) with other charges.
>
> --------------------------
>
> What can be formulated from the above, is that what is emitted is also
> what is contained to simulate particle. In such a "matter", the micro-
> eye would see contained light(micro-star) emitting light.
>
> In our quantum micro-view, science has established that there is two
> unique micro-stars, one larger than the other, and both of higher
> dynamics that disregard Newtonian law meaning their forces are not-
> proportional to their sizes.
>
> Yet Newtonian law (force of gravity per distance^2) is also a field
> law, and these two micro-stars being micro-viewed as two fields must
> somehow adhere to this law even though they show to be breaking
> it.......

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: AI Methodologies was Re: The stalker problem was Re: The Collapseof the wave function was Re: Avatars was Re: Bandwidth was Re: The WOW wasRe: Your magic cubicle was Re: Paging Cpt. Nemo was Re: Time Travel Vacationswas Re: Pretending was Re: Multi-
Next: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 25 Jun 2010 Washington, DC