Prev: Timerate and light speed
Next: Gamma the universal curve
From: jdawe on 8 Feb 2010 20:19
No 'body' will ever last forever in this universe and we can tell when
galaxies, planets, star systems etc are nearing an end when the 50/50
harmony of a sphere begins to fluctuate and it becomes horizontally
wider, vertically smaller etc.


On Feb 9, 2:51 am, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote:
> Empiler wrote:
>
> > You're confusing a state of minimum gravitational potential energy
> > with something magical.
>
> idiot OP "jdawe" is vastly worse than that.  Given a homogeneous
> isotropic constant quantity of non-rotating solid mass, shape it so as
> to have maximum surface gravitation.  The surface of a solid sphere is
> not the optimum solution.  Maximum gravitation at surface (radius=R,
> spherical coords):
>
>  Sphere,  r(theta) = 2Rcos(theta)
>  Shmoo,   r(theta) = 5^(1/3)Rsqrt[cos(theta)]
>   (6/5)[(5/8)^(1/3)] = 1.026X larger gravity at origin

You are trying to optimise for only one form of matter and only one
force.

The sphere allows for harmony of both forms of matter and both
opposing forces. The sphere allows for harmony of all opposing
operations.

-Josh.
From: BURT on 8 Feb 2010 21:48
On Feb 8, 5:19 pm, jdawe <mrjd...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> No 'body' will ever last forever in this universe and we can tell when
> galaxies, planets, star systems etc are nearing an end when the 50/50
> harmony of a sphere begins to fluctuate and it becomes horizontally
> wider, vertically smaller etc.
>
> On Feb 9, 2:51 am, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote:
>
> > Empiler wrote:
>
> > > You're confusing a state of minimum gravitational potential energy
> > > with something magical.
>
> > idiot OP "jdawe" is vastly worse than that.  Given a homogeneous
> > isotropic constant quantity of non-rotating solid mass, shape it so as
> > to have maximum surface gravitation.  The surface of a solid sphere is
> > not the optimum solution.  Maximum gravitation at surface (radius=R,
> > spherical coords):
>
> >  Sphere,  r(theta) = 2Rcos(theta)
> >  Shmoo,   r(theta) = 5^(1/3)Rsqrt[cos(theta)]
> >   (6/5)[(5/8)^(1/3)] = 1.026X larger gravity at origin
>
> You are trying to optimise for only one form of matter and only one
> force.
>
> The sphere allows for harmony of both forms of matter and both
> opposing forces. The sphere allows for harmony of all opposing
> operations.
>
> -Josh.

Light sphere is as Einstein said " a spherical wave."

Mitch Raemsch
From: Paul Cardinale on 9 Feb 2010 22:39
Idiot.
Go drool somewhere else.
From: BURT on 9 Feb 2010 22:44
On Feb 9, 7:39 pm, Paul Cardinale <pcardin...(a)volcanomail.com> wrote:
> Idiot.
> Go drool somewhere else.

The theory of appearence is Relativity.
From: jdawe on 10 Feb 2010 18:26
On Feb 9, 12:19 pm, jdawe <mrjd...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> No 'body' will ever last forever in this universe and we can tell when
> galaxies, planets, star systems etc are nearing an end when the 50/50
> harmony of a sphere begins to fluctuate and it becomes horizontally
> wider, vertically smaller etc.
>
> On Feb 9, 2:51 am, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote:
>
> > Empiler wrote:
>
> > > You're confusing a state of minimum gravitational potential energy
> > > with something magical.
>
> > idiot OP "jdawe" is vastly worse than that.  Given a homogeneous
> > isotropic constant quantity of non-rotating solid mass, shape it so as
> > to have maximum surface gravitation.  The surface of a solid sphere is
> > not the optimum solution.  Maximum gravitation at surface (radius=R,
> > spherical coords):
>
> >  Sphere,  r(theta) = 2Rcos(theta)
> >  Shmoo,   r(theta) = 5^(1/3)Rsqrt[cos(theta)]
> >   (6/5)[(5/8)^(1/3)] = 1.026X larger gravity at origin
>
> You are trying to optimise for only one form of matter and only one
> force.
>
> The sphere allows for harmony of both forms of matter and both
> opposing forces. The sphere allows for harmony of all opposing
> operations.
>
> -Josh.

I now understand all 'bodies' are spheres.

It does not matter if it is a human, tree, chicken, planet, moon
whatever all bodies start out as close to the 50/50 opposing operation
harmony of a sphere as possible.

A newborn human baby from wikipedia:

"A newborn's shoulders and hips are narrow, the abdomen protrudes
slightly, and the arms and legs are relatively short"

In other words a newborn baby is very close to a perfect sphere.

A new tree starts off from the sphere of a seed.

A new chicken starts off as an egg sphere.

It is at this point when these new 'bodies' are very close to a
perfect sphere that they will have the greatest potential. For a human
body the average age may be 75 years. So, a newborn human baby sphere
will have a potential of 75 years ahead of it. As the sphere deforms
and the opposing operations cease their 50/50 harmony the potential of
those bodies diminishes. A human aged 35 years is quite deformed from
its original sphere so therefore it will only have a potential of
another 40 years left in it.

-Josh.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Timerate and light speed
Next: Gamma the universal curve