Prev: beautiful equation
Next: Quantum Gravity 399.1: France finds Macroscopic-Microscopic Duality with Deceleration to Acceleration Transition Analogous to Elliptic Flow of Strong Interaction Collisions and to Compression followed by Relaxation Phase of Collision
From: train on 25 Jun 2010 04:43
On Jun 25, 10:25 am, "k...(a)nventure.com" <k...(a)nventure.com> wrote:>
On Jun 24, 5:54 pm, train <gehan.ameresek...(a)gmail.com> wrote:> > > >
snip> > > Meanwhile we will take up Androcles excellent suggestion to
consider> > the GPS satellites, and thence calculate for ourselves the
time> > dilation of the gps clock wrt the earth clock and thence
arrive at a> > xxxxx. That is what we are after is it not?> > snip> >
> 1944.4444444035500000000 metres> > > am I right?> > I did not check
your math or numbers.> I did not have to, to see that you are wrong.>
Your goal was to calculate the time dilation> of the 'gps clock wrt
the earth clock'. So> should not the solution be in units of measure>
of time, rather than length or distance?> > D.Y.K.Time dilation , and
thence the position error at 7000 kmh.
From: Cassidy Furlong on 26 Jun 2010 17:38
are not dilation of time and length (in the direction
of time-travellin' (sik), directly porportional?

thus&so:
how many of us'd ever understood a proof of the unfinity of the
primes?... well,
if not, we'll never get p-adic numbers, or AP-didactical ones,
either. anyway,
p-adics are cool, when subsumed in Galois theory (or vise-versa .-)

thus&so:
well, there's phi of me to one o'you; go figure!

> outnumber the intelligent so, odds are that the first replier to a post is not even dot.dot

--the duke of oil!
Rationale. In addition to political, economic, and mechanical
feasibility, one must consider the environmental consequences of
choosing ethanol over gasoline. In par- ticular, the amount of air
pollution released in the form of CO2 and other green house gases
(GHGs) is a crucial point of interest. In order to model the
difference in ethanol and gasoline emissions, it is necessary to
calculate the final mass of GHGs (in the case where 10% of the
gasoline energy supply has been replaced by ethanol) minus the ini-
tial mass (before the 10% replacement was implemented). If the result
is negative, the 10% ethanol scenario gives off fewer GHGs; if it is
positive, it gives off more.
Assumptions and calculations. Our model is based on the following
assump- tions:
1.
Itisassumedthatnearlyallofthegasolinerequiredfortheproductionofethanol
is used in the farming and harvesting stage, while other energy
sources (i.e., coal)
http://www.maa.org/pubs/cmj47.pdf
http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biography/chapter-8-the-permian-basin-gang/
From: Cassidy Furlong on 26 Jun 2010 17:45
so, ;et us put this in terms of you and
your fraternal twin or other space-cadet buddy, and
your respectively & symmetrically accelerating frame-
works of reference (or,
more generally,
two differently accelerating & decelerating & revolving & rotating
frames
of reference, viz Spaceship Earth and another one.

Okey-doke?

thus&so:
are not dilation of time and length (in the direction
of time-travellin' (sik), directly porportional?

thus&so:
how many of us'd ever understood a proof of the unfinity of the
primes?... well,
if not, we'll never get p-adic numbers, or AP-didactical ones,
either. anyway,
p-adics are cool, when subsumed in Galois theory (or vise-versa .-)

thus&so:
well, there's phi of me to one o'you; go figure!

> outnumber the intelligent so, odds are that the first replier to a post is not even dot.dot

--the duke of oil!
Rationale. In addition to political, economic, and mechanical
feasibility, one must consider the environmental consequences of
choosing ethanol over gasoline. In par- ticular, the amount of air
pollution released in the form of CO2 and other green house gases
(GHGs) is a crucial point of interest. In order to model the
difference in ethanol and gasoline emissions, it is necessary to
calculate the final mass of GHGs (in the case where 10% of the
gasoline energy supply has been replaced by ethanol) minus the ini-
tial mass (before the 10% replacement was implemented). If the result
is negative, the 10% ethanol scenario gives off fewer GHGs; if it is
positive, it gives off more.
Assumptions and calculations. Our model is based on the following
assump- tions:
1.
Itisassumedthatnearlyallofthegasolinerequiredfortheproductionofethanol
is used in the farming and harvesting stage, while other energy
sources (i.e., coal)
http://www.maa.org/pubs/cmj47.pdf
http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biography/chapter-8-the-permian-basin-gang/
From: train on 3 Jul 2010 20:09
On Jun 25, 10:25 am, "k...(a)nventure.com" <k...(a)nventure.com> wrote:
> On Jun 24, 5:54 pm, train <gehan.ameresek...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> snip
>
> > Meanwhile we will take up Androcles excellent suggestion to consider
> > the GPS satellites, and thence calculate for ourselves the time
> > dilation of the gps clock wrt the earth clock and thence arrive at a
> > xxxxx. That is what we are after is it not?
>
> snip
>
> > 1944.4444444035500000000 metres
>
> > am I right?
>
> I did not check your math or numbers.
> I did not have to, to see that you are wrong.
> Your goal was to calculate the time dilation
> of the 'gps clock wrt the earth clock'. So
> should not the solution be in units of measure
> of time, rather than length or distance?
>
> D.Y.K.

So what is the right answer?
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Prev: beautiful equation
Next: Quantum Gravity 399.1: France finds Macroscopic-Microscopic Duality with Deceleration to Acceleration Transition Analogous to Elliptic Flow of Strong Interaction Collisions and to Compression followed by Relaxation Phase of Collision