From: George Herold on
On Jun 3, 5:41 pm, "langw...(a)fonz.dk" <langw...(a)fonz.dk> wrote:
> On 3 Jun., 21:41, George Herold <gher...(a)teachspin.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > So the following is the result of a previous thread where John Larkin
> > suggested that one way to get rid of the voltage asymmetry in a Zener
> > noise source was to sum a whole bunch together.  I was initially
> > doubtful, but thought I should do the experiment.  I had a whole bunch
> > (five) of lockins to test today.  They have a build in Zener noise
> > source with terrible asymmetry.   So I summed them with an opamp, fed
> > the signal to a digital ‘scope and had it measure the min and max
> > voltage.  (There is lots of noise in the measurements so the number
> > are not that accurate.. but the result is clear.  The central limit
> > theorem rocks!
>
> > Number         Vmax       Vmin.
> > of
> > zeners
>
> > 1             0.80       -0.33
> > 2             1.20       -0.53
> > 3             1.50       -0.75
> > 4             1.60       -0.95
>
> > Thanks John,
>
> > George H.
>
> try subtracting instead ;)
>
> gets rid of the non zero mean
>
> -Lasse- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Ahh inverting and adding. Yeah that would work. This really isn't
about reducing the asymmetry as much as showing (to myself) that the
central limit theorem works.

George H.
From: John Larkin on
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 16:04:15 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
<gherold(a)teachspin.com> wrote:

>On Jun 3, 4:40�pm, John Larkin
><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 12:41:34 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <gher...(a)teachspin.com> wrote:
>> >So the following is the result of a previous thread where John Larkin
>> >suggested that one way to get rid of the voltage asymmetry in a Zener
>> >noise source was to sum a whole bunch together. �I was initially
>> >doubtful, but thought I should do the experiment. �I had a whole bunch
>> >(five) of lockins to test today. �They have a build in Zener noise
>> >source with terrible asymmetry. � So I summed them with an opamp, fed
>> >the signal to a digital �scope and had it measure the min and max
>> >voltage. �(There is lots of noise in the measurements so the number
>> >are not that accurate.. but the result is clear. �The central limit
>> >theorem rocks!
>>
>> >Number � � � � Vmax � � � Vmin.
>> >of
>> >zeners
>>
>> >1 � � � � � � 0.80 � � � -0.33
>> >2 � � � � � � 1.20 � � � -0.53
>> >3 � � � � � � 1.50 � � � -0.75
>> >4 � � � � � � 1.60 � � � -0.95
>>
>> >Thanks John,
>>
>> >George H.
>>
>> What current are you running the zeners at? More current will improve
>> the distribution at the cost of a bit of amplitude.
>>
>> John- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>This is an old design done years ago. At the time I was looking for
>maximal noise and didn't really care about the asymmetry. These are
>made with 20 volt zeners running off the +/- 15 volt rails with I
>think a meg of resistance... 10uA of current. (I'd have to check the
>schematic.)
>
>George H.

Pardon me for shouting, but

YIKES!

SPIKES!

John


From: George Herold on
On Jun 3, 6:02 pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:41:32 -0700 (PDT), "langw...(a)fonz.dk"
>
>
>
>
>
> <langw...(a)fonz.dk> wrote:
> >On 3 Jun., 21:41, George Herold <gher...(a)teachspin.com> wrote:
> >> So the following is the result of a previous thread where John Larkin
> >> suggested that one way to get rid of the voltage asymmetry in a Zener
> >> noise source was to sum a whole bunch together.  I was initially
> >> doubtful, but thought I should do the experiment.  I had a whole bunch
> >> (five) of lockins to test today.  They have a build in Zener noise
> >> source with terrible asymmetry.   So I summed them with an opamp, fed
> >> the signal to a digital ‘scope and had it measure the min and max
> >> voltage.  (There is lots of noise in the measurements so the number
> >> are not that accurate.. but the result is clear.  The central limit
> >> theorem rocks!
>
> >> Number         Vmax       Vmin.
> >> of
> >> zeners
>
> >> 1             0.80       -0.33
> >> 2             1.20       -0.53
> >> 3             1.50       -0.75
> >> 4             1.60       -0.95
>
> >> Thanks John,
>
> >> George H.
>
> >try subtracting instead ;)
>
> >gets rid of the non zero mean
>
> >-Lasse
>
> It should make the symmetry converge faster, too.
>
> Maybe the mean is zero, but the spikies are just lopsided. If so, the
> first case, +0.80 and -0.33, is really bent!
>
> John- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Yeah the mean is zero. There is AC coupling somewhere in the signal
chain. And yes it's has terrible asymmetry! I must have the zeners
biased right near the knee.

George H.
From: George Herold on
On Jun 3, 7:10 pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 16:04:15 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
>
>
>
>
>
> <gher...(a)teachspin.com> wrote:
> >On Jun 3, 4:40 pm, John Larkin
> ><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 12:41:34 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
>
> >> <gher...(a)teachspin.com> wrote:
> >> >So the following is the result of a previous thread where John Larkin
> >> >suggested that one way to get rid of the voltage asymmetry in a Zener
> >> >noise source was to sum a whole bunch together.  I was initially
> >> >doubtful, but thought I should do the experiment.  I had a whole bunch
> >> >(five) of lockins to test today.  They have a build in Zener noise
> >> >source with terrible asymmetry.   So I summed them with an opamp, fed
> >> >the signal to a digital ‘scope and had it measure the min and max
> >> >voltage.  (There is lots of noise in the measurements so the number
> >> >are not that accurate.. but the result is clear.  The central limit
> >> >theorem rocks!
>
> >> >Number         Vmax       Vmin.
> >> >of
> >> >zeners
>
> >> >1             0.80       -0.33
> >> >2             1.20       -0.53
> >> >3             1.50       -0.75
> >> >4             1.60       -0.95
>
> >> >Thanks John,
>
> >> >George H.
>
> >> What current are you running the zeners at? More current will improve
> >> the distribution at the cost of a bit of amplitude.
>
> >> John- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >This is an old design done years ago.  At the time I was looking for
> >maximal noise and didn't really care about the asymmetry.  These are
> >made with 20 volt zeners running off the +/- 15 volt rails with I
> >think a meg of resistance... 10uA of current.  (I'd have to check the
> >schematic.)
>
> >George H.
>
> Pardon me for shouting, but
>
> YIKES!
>
> SPIKES!
>
> John- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Hee HEE, I'm kinda embarrassed by the circuits I designed years ago,
But, "Damn it Jim I'm a physicist not an engineer.”

George H.
From: Jay Ts on
langwadt(a)fonz.dk wrote:
> George Herold wrote:
>> So the following is the result of a previous thread where John Larkin
>> suggested that one way to get rid of the voltage asymmetry in a Zener
>> noise source was to sum a whole bunch together.  I was initially
>> doubtful, but thought I should do the experiment.  I had a whole bunch
>> (five) of lockins to test today.  They have a build in Zener noise
>> source with terrible asymmetry.   So I summed them with an opamp, fed
>> the signal to a digital 'scope and had it measure the min and max
>> voltage.  (There is lots of noise in the measurements so the number are
>> not that accurate.. but the result is clear.  The central limit theorem
>> rocks!
>>
>> Number         Vmax       Vmin. of
>> zeners
>>
>> 1             0.80       -0.33 2             1.20       -0.53 3        
>>     1.50       -0.75 4             1.60       -0.95
>>
>> Thanks John,
>>
>> George H.
>
> try subtracting instead ;)
>
> gets rid of the non zero mean

Here is a schematic of a little circuit I created
yesterday after following the original thread on
this topic:

http://jayts.com/images/WhiteNoiseGen-Med.png

I just put some ideas together from the discussion
here, along with other things I found from some
quick Internet searches.

I used two opamps to bring the output up to
about +4 dBu (commonly used in pro audio).

The circuit is not optimized, and it's certainly
not a great example of schematic capture. I was
just trying out gschem on my Linux system to see
how well (or _if_) it worked. Obviously, it's
better to pay money for schematic capture software.

I put the output of the circuit into a PC
24/96 audio card, and on a spectrum analyzer app,
it showed about a 6 dB drop in amplitude from
near DC (0 dB) to 40 KHz (-6 dB). I did not
think this was really bad, but if anyone knows
how to make this flatter, short of an esoteric
and expensive "noise diode", please comment.

On my Tek oscilloscope, I used the averaging mode
of the display, and the trace averaged out to
a bumpy line at 0 volts. It's quite symmetric
as far as I can tell.

Jay Ts
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Prev: SN754410 vs. L293
Next: Wayyyyy OT: European measurements