The mafia
in [Physics]
|
Prev: BBC News Q&A: Professor Phil Jones
Next: Penn material scientists demonstrate the transduction of optical radiation to electrical current in a molecular circuit
From: Michael Gordge on 17 Feb 2010 16:43 On Feb 17, 9:39 am, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Michael Gordge wrote: > > On Feb 14, 11:41 pm, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > What this is is 'not even wrong' i.e. its premisses are so far off > > > base that it can't even be argued against sensibly. > > > It's the premise of capitalism that can not be argue against, and so > > because ewe cant, ewe choose to attack me and not the subject being > > debated, typical behaviour of ewe lefturd retards. > > See what I said about this guy not even reading my posts ! > > Andrew Usher You arbitrary unsubstaniated nauseating nasal whining leftist claim is "capitalism is based upon sand", whereas in reality it is based upon the foundation of the rock of private property ownership and beginning at you, your body your skin, up-holding YOU as the owner, therefore responsible for the results of your actions. The examples ewe gave against capitalism are dishonest, they are NOT capitalism they are cronyism. MG
From: Michael Gordge on 17 Feb 2010 17:13 On Feb 17, 9:39 am, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > See what I said about this guy not even reading my posts ! > > Andrew Usher "I can set no absolute rule on whether the government ought to have more or less power; .......................... ...................... Whatever I am, I am not a Marxist as I do not believe in the philsophical junk associated with the name of Marxism, which is of course Jewish." You need to spend some time on checking and clarifying your premise. MG
From: Michael Gordge on 17 Feb 2010 17:19 On Feb 18, 3:45 am, Darwin123 <drosen0...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Feb 16, 9:58 pm, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > The difference with women and blacks > > > is that in their present form they are not really a threat to the > > > existing economic system, largely because they're having to fight > > > against social as well as economic oppression. > > You are a National Socialist! I sensed it from the beginning, but > wasn't sure. The evidence is he's lost his way on his journey, or to be more accurate, he's running around in circles between socialism communism - marxism / fascism / nazism, the silly twit believes there are fundamental differences between them. MG
From: Andrew Usher on 17 Feb 2010 18:21 Darwin123 wrote: > On Feb 16, 9:58 pm, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > The difference with women and blacks > > > is that in their present form they are not really a threat to the > > > existing economic system, largely because they're having to fight > > > against social as well as economic oppression. > > > You are a National Socialist! I sensed it from the beginning, but > wasn't sure Excellent posting, dimwit! You are attempting to call me a 'National Socialist', but only quoted another poster! In any case, it's nothing but a typical leftist tactic to scream 'Nazi' at views that challenge their dogmas. Andrew Usher
From: Darwin123 on 17 Feb 2010 21:47
On Feb 17, 6:21 pm, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Darwin123 wrote: > > On Feb 16, 9:58 pm, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > The difference with women and blacks > > > > is that in their present form they are not really a threat to the > > > > existing economic system, largely because they're having to fight > > > > against social as well as economic oppression. > > > You are a National Socialist! I sensed it from the beginning, but > > wasn't sure > > Excellent posting, dimwit! You are attempting to call me a 'National > Socialist', but only quoted another poster! Who, Lorentz? That's me, too. It's not a sock puppet. I messed up when I joined Google. The software sometimes lists me as Darwin123, and sometimes as Lorentz. > > In any case, it's nothing but a typical leftist tactic to scream > 'Nazi' at views that challenge their dogmas. Your position on science are based on your insecurities concerning race, not on logic or profit. It is not precisely Fascism. However, it is a convincing facsimile. > > Andrew Usher |