The mafia
in [Physics]
|
Prev: BBC News Q&A: Professor Phil Jones
Next: Penn material scientists demonstrate the transduction of optical radiation to electrical current in a molecular circuit
From: Immortalist on 17 Feb 2010 22:12 On Feb 17, 10:45 am, Darwin123 <drosen0...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Feb 16, 9:58 pm, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > The difference with women and blacks > > > is that in their present form they are not really a threat to the > > > existing economic system, largely because they're having to fight > > > against social as well as economic oppression. > > You are a National Socialist! I sensed it from the beginning, but > wasn't sure. National socialists prefer giving more freedom and rights to corporations than the people. Leftists and communitarians are more concerned about the rights of individuals over corperatism. Fascism is an authoritarian political ideology (generally tied to a mass movement) that considers individual and other societal interests subordinate to the needs of the state, and seeks to forge a type of national unity, usually based on, but not limited to, ethnic, cultural, or racial attributes. Various scholars attribute different characteristics to fascism, but the following elements are usually seen as its integral parts: nationalism, authoritarianism, statism, militarism, totalitarianism, anti-communism, collectivism, corporatism, populism, and opposition to economic and political liberalism. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism Historically, corporatism or corporativism (Italian: corporativismo) refers to a political or economic system in which power is given to civic assemblies that represent economic, industrial, agrarian, social, cultural, and professional groups. These civic assemblies, known as corporations (not necessarily in the same sense as contemporary business corporations) are unelected bodies with an internal hierarchy; their purpose is to exert control over their respective areas of social or economic life. Thus, for example, a steel corporation would be a cartel composed of all the business leaders in the steel industry, coming together to discuss a common policy on prices and wages. When much political and economic power rests in the hands of such groups, then a corporatist system is in place.... ....Political scientists may also use the term corporatism to describe a practice whereby an authoritarian state, through the process of licensing and regulating officially-incorporated social, religious, economic, or popular organizations, effectively co-opts their leadership or circumscribes their ability to challenge state authority by establishing the state as the source of their legitimacy, as well as sometimes running them, either directly or indirectly through shill corporations. This usage is particularly common in the area of East Asian studies, and is sometimes also referred to as state corporatism. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism
From: Michael Gordge on 18 Feb 2010 02:31 On Feb 18, 12:34 pm, Bappa <banerjeeadda1...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > When great-great individualists nevertheless have to depend upon > others for their survival (someone else does their food gathering, > they just havr to pay) the situation is ultimately always > socialistic, like it or not. There is nothing socialistic in you being left free and alone to be the sole benefactor and the sole decider of the results of your energy, idiot. MG
From: Michael Gordge on 19 Feb 2010 16:34 On Feb 19, 7:15 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > lets compromise upon > 'social capitalism ' ! compromise with an oxymoron, ewe cant be serious. MG
From: Y.Porat on 20 Feb 2010 00:40 On Feb 19, 11:34 pm, Michael Gordge <mikegor...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > On Feb 19, 7:15 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > lets compromise upon > > 'social capitalism ' ! > > compromise with an oxymoron, ewe cant be serious. > > MG ================ how old are you ?? ddint you learn untill now that *realistic ** life is a long saga of compromises ?? ---------------------
From: Y.Porat on 20 Feb 2010 00:43
On Feb 17, 5:16 am, Urion <blackman_...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Feb 17, 4:58 am, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > But they don't. Why then is there no revolutionary threat right now in > > the Western world? It's because they've successfully brainwashed > > almost all of us. What to do about that is an important question. > > The only reason that revolution hasn't happened by now is that most > people do not want a revolution because they know that revolution may > only make things worse for them. Also most of the time revolutions are > squashed by the powerful minority. ----------------- I dont Believe in revolutions i believe in EVOLUTION !! ATB Y.Porat -------------------- |