The quantum wavelength
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Good current paper on mass / luminosity and rotation curves
Next: Quantum Gravity 399.95: Superluminality/Inflation --> Subluminality/Deceleration and Neo-Cyclic Acceleration by Probable Influence/Causation (PI)
From: BURT on 30 Jun 2010 14:10 QM is too wavy. There is only a single sin wavelength for the wave function. Even Stephen Hawking pointed this out in his book. Mitch Raemsch
From: purple on 30 Jun 2010 14:24 On 6/30/2010 1:10 PM, BURT wrote: > QM is too wavy. There is only a single sin wavelength for the wave > function. Even Stephen Hawking pointed this out in his book. > > Mitch Raemsch Are you talking about a wave or a wave function? Let's see how much trouble you can get yourself into this time.
From: BURT on 30 Jun 2010 14:27 On Jun 30, 11:24 am, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 6/30/2010 1:10 PM, BURT wrote: > > > QM is too wavy. There is only a single sin wavelength for the wave > > function. Even Stephen Hawking pointed this out in his book. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > Are you talking about a wave or a wave function? Let's > see how much trouble you can get yourself into this time. Really the is not wave function in nature but QM people want to make it a math. It is just a quantum wave. Mitch Raemsch
From: BURT on 30 Jun 2010 15:10 On Jun 30, 11:27 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jun 30, 11:24 am, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > On 6/30/2010 1:10 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > QM is too wavy. There is only a single sin wavelength for the wave > > > function. Even Stephen Hawking pointed this out in his book. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > Are you talking about a wave or a wave function? Let's > > see how much trouble you can get yourself into this time. > > Really the is not wave function in nature but QM people want to make > it a math. It is just a quantum wave. > > Mitch Raemsch The quantum wave in theory is mathematical but in nature it is immaterial aether wave. Mitch Raemsch
From: Raymond Yohros on 1 Jul 2010 10:29
On Jun 30, 2:10 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jun 30, 11:27 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 30, 11:24 am, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > On 6/30/2010 1:10 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > QM is too wavy. There is only a single sin wavelength for the wave > > > > function. Even Stephen Hawking pointed this out in his book. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > Are you talking about a wave or a wave function? Let's > > > see how much trouble you can get yourself into this time. > > > Really the is not wave function in nature but QM people want to make > > it a math. It is just a quantum wave. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > The quantum wave in theory is mathematical but in nature it is > immaterial aether wave. > > Mitch Raemsch > burt, do yourself a favor and stop wasting youre life away with nonsense. it is not how much you say but what you say! r.y |