The safest Browser is IE7
in [Mozilla]
|
Prev: Firefox autodial
Next: Firefox is already running....
From: john sumner on 30 Mar 2007 15:09 SteveG <_@_._> wrote in news:IOcPh.2813$NK2.1637(a)text.news.blueyonder.co.uk: > John may (or may not) lack comprehension skills but I have to tell you > that "validify" is NOT an English word. I'm guessing your American and > exercising your "right" to make up words just because you don't know the > correct one to use. Try "validate" instead :-) > > <flame proof jacket now donned in anticipation of impending tirade> <BCG> I do have comprehension skills i just think this guy who started this is a troll who is in love with microsoft
From: Michel Doucet on 30 Mar 2007 15:11 Le Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:03:51 -0500, businessman a caress� son clavier pour nous dire dans jl9q03tiru715tb734b0lv49u9ia72u6al(a)4ax.com ce qui suit : >>> IE7 is now the safest browser. >> >>A look at the source discounts this immediately. Also, this is the same >>troll who argued for weeks about a moot point in an another group. > > Trolls such as yourself are automatically added to my kill filters. *Your* post is *the* troll .... -- Utiliser le butineur, le courrielleur, le lecteur de nouvelles et l'OS avec lesquels vous vous sentez le plus s�curis� ;)
From: History Fan on 30 Mar 2007 16:21 >>What shocks me is that IE6 is safer than Firefox 1.x I find that VERY hard to believe.
From: John Thompson on 30 Mar 2007 17:56 On 2007-03-30, businessman(a)nomail.com <businessman(a)nomail.com> wrote: > I hate to break this to everyone, but according to > http://msmvps.com/blogs/spywaresucks/archive/2007/03/22/701346.aspx > > IE7 is now the safest browser. The common denominator on these seens to be Windows. Get rid of Windows and your spyware issue vanishes. -- John (john(a)os2.dhs.org)
From: businessman on 30 Mar 2007 20:21
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:38:32 GMT, SteveG <_@_._> wrote: >businessman(a)nomail.com wrote: >> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:05:11 +0000 (UTC), john sumner >> <josumner1965(a)cs.com> wrote: >> >>> businessman(a)nomail.com wrote in >>> news:e12q039kquehgge27c27f6h8dabjof94lv(a)4ax.com: >>> >>>> Neither. Just sharing what I found on the website link that I >>>> included in my post. If you actually read my whole post, Firefox 2.0x >>>> came in almost identical, just a fraction of a percent lower. On the >>>> other hand Firefox 1.x did not come in good. On the other hand, Opera >>>> was very poor. >>>> >>>> I dont believe everything I read on websites, so I was hoping to get >>>> some useful feedback on this. Unfortunately your reply did not fall >>>> into the "useful" category. >>>> >>> And your point being? >> >> Apparently you lack reading comprehension !!!!! >> >> Now putting aside trolls such as yourself who only waste bandwidth, >> >> Does anyone on here have any security facts to share. I'd like to >> validify this. I find it kind of hard to imagine that IE6 was more >> secure than Firefox 1.x. I have not tried IE7, so I can not >> personally comment. I was always under the impression that FF was >> pretty secure, at least that is what everyone kept saying, but if this >> information is accurate, all versions of FF prior to 2.0x was not very >> secure at all, and IE6 was actually more secure. If anyone has any >> facts or know of other websites, I'd sure like to know what is true. >> >> > >John may (or may not) lack comprehension skills but I have to tell you >that "validify" is NOT an English word. I'm guessing your American and >exercising your "right" to make up words just because you don't know the >correct one to use. Try "validate" instead :-) > ><flame proof jacket now donned in anticipation of impending tirade> <BCG> Thanks That word had me stumbling..... now I know !!!! |