Prev: solutions book
Next: A new suggestion, about the new big linear accelerator thatis now being designed!!
From: Ken S. Tucker on 27 Jul 2010 19:13
On Jul 27, 12:23 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Ken S. Tucker wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > MST eliminates artifacts (such as Frame Drag) and enables the
> > inertial
> > effects in the geodesic.
>
> Ken, when are you going to stop lying about frame dragging?

You should avoid using pop-sci sensational articles to support
your thinking.

> You've been
> sourced on its' multiple independent observations many times over the last
> decade.

1) It's NASA's conclusion (having spent $500,000,000 on GP-b),
in consultation with theoreticians, that 'frame dragging' cannot be
measured, I agree with that scientifically measured conclusion.

2) Do you (Eric) know how to transform imaginary CS's to real?
If you do then provide a simple demo,
then following that predict 'frame dragging'.
Ken
From: eric gisse on 27 Jul 2010 21:01
Ken S. Tucker wrote:

> On Jul 27, 12:23 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ken S. Tucker wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > MST eliminates artifacts (such as Frame Drag) and enables the
>> > inertial
>> > effects in the geodesic.
>>
>> Ken, when are you going to stop lying about frame dragging?
>
> You should avoid using pop-sci sensational articles to support
> your thinking.
>
>> You've been
>> sourced on its' multiple independent observations many times over the
>> last decade.
>
> 1) It's NASA's conclusion (having spent $500,000,000 on GP-b),
> in consultation with theoreticians, that 'frame dragging' cannot be
> measured, I agree with that scientifically measured conclusion.

Liar.

http://einstein.stanford.edu/highlights/status1.html

>
> 2) Do you (Eric) know how to transform imaginary CS's to real?
> If you do then provide a simple demo,
> then following that predict 'frame dragging'.
> Ken
From: mpc755 on 27 Jul 2010 21:16
On Jul 27, 7:13 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca> wrote:
> On Jul 27, 12:23 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Ken S. Tucker wrote:
>
> > [...]
>
> > >  MST eliminates artifacts (such as Frame Drag) and enables the
> > > inertial
> > > effects in the geodesic.
>
> > Ken, when are you going to stop lying about frame dragging?
>
> You should avoid using pop-sci sensational articles to support
> your thinking.
>
> > You've been
> > sourced on its' multiple independent observations many times over the last
> > decade.
>
> 1) It's NASA's conclusion (having spent $500,000,000 on GP-b),
> in consultation with theoreticians, that 'frame dragging' cannot be
> measured, I agree with that scientifically measured conclusion.
>
> 2) Do you (Eric) know how to transform imaginary CS's to real?
> If you do then provide a simple demo,
> then following that predict 'frame dragging'.
> Ken

Frame dragging is a change in the state of displaced dark matter
caused by the moving Earth.
From: BURT on 27 Jul 2010 21:43
On Jul 27, 6:16 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 27, 7:13 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 27, 12:23 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Ken S. Tucker wrote:
>
> > > [...]
>
> > > >  MST eliminates artifacts (such as Frame Drag) and enables the
> > > > inertial
> > > > effects in the geodesic.
>
> > > Ken, when are you going to stop lying about frame dragging?
>
> > You should avoid using pop-sci sensational articles to support
> > your thinking.
>
> > > You've been
> > > sourced on its' multiple independent observations many times over the last
> > > decade.
>
> > 1) It's NASA's conclusion (having spent $500,000,000 on GP-b),
> > in consultation with theoreticians, that 'frame dragging' cannot be
> > measured, I agree with that scientifically measured conclusion.
>
> > 2) Do you (Eric) know how to transform imaginary CS's to real?
> > If you do then provide a simple demo,
> > then following that predict 'frame dragging'.
> > Ken
>
> Frame dragging is a change in the state of displaced dark matter
> caused by the moving Earth.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Energy does not drag space. It moves in it.

Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 27 Jul 2010 23:58
On Jul 27, 9:43 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 27, 6:16 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 27, 7:13 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 27, 12:23 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Ken S. Tucker wrote:
>
> > > > [...]
>
> > > > >  MST eliminates artifacts (such as Frame Drag) and enables the
> > > > > inertial
> > > > > effects in the geodesic.
>
> > > > Ken, when are you going to stop lying about frame dragging?
>
> > > You should avoid using pop-sci sensational articles to support
> > > your thinking.
>
> > > > You've been
> > > > sourced on its' multiple independent observations many times over the last
> > > > decade.
>
> > > 1) It's NASA's conclusion (having spent $500,000,000 on GP-b),
> > > in consultation with theoreticians, that 'frame dragging' cannot be
> > > measured, I agree with that scientifically measured conclusion.
>
> > > 2) Do you (Eric) know how to transform imaginary CS's to real?
> > > If you do then provide a simple demo,
> > > then following that predict 'frame dragging'.
> > > Ken
>
> > Frame dragging is a change in the state of displaced dark matter
> > caused by the moving Earth.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Energy does not drag space. It moves in it.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

Frame dragging is a change in the state of displaced dark matter
caused by the moving Earth.
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: solutions book
Next: A new suggestion, about the new big linear accelerator thatis now being designed!!