There is no "pull" of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Was Einstein Guilty of Scientific Fraud?
Next: Question about energy eigenvalues of a Hamiltonian, in general
From: mpc755 on 24 Mar 2010 13:05 In article <3e186367-b091-43c2-8fb9-16cf3f631204 @y17g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, thedraperfamily(a)gmail.com says... > > On Mar 24, 10:57 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mar 24, 10:48 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mar 24, 9:41 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 24, 10:39 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 6:23 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 6:19 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 5:15 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 6:13 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 5:08 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 6:01 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 4:50 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You enter the class room and begin to discuss how the future > > > > > > > > > > > > determines the past > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yup, and then I show the experimental evidence, so they can judge for > > > > > > > > > > > themselves. Very few of them choose to disbelieve the evidence. > > > > > > > > > > > > Any experiment you provide as evidence can be explained as waves > > > > > > > > > > propagating available paths and particles traveling a single path. > > > > > > > > > > > Explanations in physics involve calculations and comparison with > > > > > > > > > quantitative measurements. > > > > > > > > > Demonstrate that this explanation exists. > > > > > > > > > > > > This will also show your state of delusional denial. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and how wave function probabilities are physical > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wave functions are physical. Probabilities are numerical results you > > > > > > > > > > > get from calculating the behavior of wave functions. I can't help it > > > > > > > > > > > if you have trouble with the words. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and how space is 'unflat' but does not move > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > Then that will be the first time. > > > > > > > > > > > First time for who? > > > > > > > > > > It woudld be the first time you explained what occurs physically in > > > > > > > > nature for space to be 'unflat'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and how you do not > > > > > > > > > > > > understand what occurs physically in nature to cause gravity. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > This will also be the first time you explained it. > > > > > > > > > > > First time I explained what? > > > > > > > > > > It woudld be the first time you explained what occurs physically in > > > > > > > > nature for space to be 'unflat'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you > > > > > > > > > > > > still insist on the existence of gravitons or have you moved past that > > > > > > > > > > > > one and now insist on the existence of gravity quanta? > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've never insisted on the existence of gravitons, which is the term > > > > > > > > > > > for gravity quanta. As I told you, they are considered likely, but we > > > > > > > > > > > don't have experimental evidence for them yet. > > > > > > > > > > Gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > You're funny. You have this idea that what you say is correct until > > > > > > > somebody can explain it otherwise in a way that you believe. > > > > > > > > > PD > > > > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory, to date.. > > > > > > > No, it isn't. It's absurd nonsense. You don't think so, but other > > > > > people do. > > > > > > > In science, the way to establish correctness is to demonstrate its > > > > > ability to make accurate quantitative predictions of observational > > > > > measurements. This is the ONLY way in science to establish > > > > > correctness. > > > > > > > I realize that you want there to be another metric, but there isn't. > > > > > Period. Tough luck. Try again. > > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory, to date. > > > > > No, it isn't. It's absurd nonsense. You don't think so, but other > > > people do. > > > > > Repeating it does not make it any less absurd nonsense. > > > > > 7+19=35. > > > > What physically occurs in nature to cause the future to determine the > > past? > > > > What physically occurs in nature to cause space to become 'unflat'? > > > > What physically occurs in nature to cause 'virtual' particles to exist > > out of nothing? > > > > What physically occurs in nature to void conservation of momentum when > > a downgraded photon pair are created (i.e. in order for there to be > > conservation of momentum the downgraded photon pair have opposite > > angular momentums) and allow for instantaneous action at a distance? > > > > In AD, the future does not determine the past. A C-60 molecule enters > > and exits a single slit and the associated aether displacement wave > > enters and exits the available slits. > > > > In AD, physical space is displaced by matter. > > > > In AD, aether displaced by matter (i.e. the plates in the Casimir > > Effect) exerts pressure towards the matter doing the displacing. This > > forces the plates in the Casimir Effect together. > > > > In AD, conservation of momentum is not simply ignored when a > > downgraded photon pair are created. The downgraded photon pair have > > opposite angular momentums in order to maintain the original photon's > > momentum. > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory, to date. > > "Most correct" in science is not established by having a short, pithy > response to "what is physically happening" questions. > "Most correct" in science is established by the theory being able to > make quantitative predictions of measurable phenomena accurately. > The second is indispensable. The first is answered only in pieces in > science, and always leaves room for more questions. > > You have it flipped around. This will be a problem for you until you > learn what science is about. > > Stop living in your dreamworld. > > PD Someone who chooses to believe the future determines the past does not understand science. What occurs physically in nature for the future to determine the past? Someone who says gravity is 'unflat' space and when asked how space physically becomes 'unflat' says, I don't know does not understand science. What occurs physically in nature to cause space to become 'unflat'? Someone who chooses to believe in 'virtual' particles which exist out of nothing does not understand science. What occurs physically in nature to cause 'virtual' particles to exist out of nothing? Someone who ignores conservation of momentum in a downgraded photon pair in order to believe in instantaneous action at a distance does not understand science. What occurs physically in nature to allow you to ignore conservation of momentum? In AD, the future does not determine the past. A C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit and the associated aether displacement wave enters and exits the available slits. In AD, physical space is displaced by matter. In AD, aether displaced by matter (i.e. the plates in the Casimir Effect) exerts pressure towards the matter doing the displacing. This forces the plates in the Casimir Effect together. In AD, conservation of momentum is not simply ignored when a downgraded photon pair are created. The downgraded photon pair have opposite angular momentums in order to maintain the original photon's momentum. In AD, in a double slit experiment with a C-60 molecule, the C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit and the associated aether displacement wave enters and exits the available slits. See de Broglie wave mechanics for more information. In AD, gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter. Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory, to date.
From: PD on 24 Mar 2010 14:20 On Mar 24, 12:05 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > In article <3e186367-b091-43c2-8fb9-16cf3f631204 > @y17g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com says... > > > > > > > On Mar 24, 10:57 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 24, 10:48 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 24, 9:41 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 24, 10:39 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 6:23 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 6:19 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 5:15 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 6:13 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 5:08 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 6:01 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 4:50 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You enter the class room and begin to discuss how the future > > > > > > > > > > > > > determines the past > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yup, and then I show the experimental evidence, so they can judge for > > > > > > > > > > > > themselves. Very few of them choose to disbelieve the evidence. > > > > > > > > > > > > Any experiment you provide as evidence can be explained as waves > > > > > > > > > > > propagating available paths and particles traveling a single path. > > > > > > > > > > > Explanations in physics involve calculations and comparison with > > > > > > > > > > quantitative measurements. > > > > > > > > > > Demonstrate that this explanation exists. > > > > > > > > > > > > This will also show your state of delusional denial. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and how wave function probabilities are physical > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wave functions are physical. Probabilities are numerical results you > > > > > > > > > > > > get from calculating the behavior of wave functions.. I can't help it > > > > > > > > > > > > if you have trouble with the words. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and how space is 'unflat' but does not move > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > Then that will be the first time. > > > > > > > > > > > First time for who? > > > > > > > > > > It woudld be the first time you explained what occurs physically in > > > > > > > > > nature for space to be 'unflat'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and how you do not > > > > > > > > > > > > > understand what occurs physically in nature to cause gravity. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > This will also be the first time you explained it. > > > > > > > > > > > First time I explained what? > > > > > > > > > > It woudld be the first time you explained what occurs physically in > > > > > > > > > nature for space to be 'unflat'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you > > > > > > > > > > > > > still insist on the existence of gravitons or have you moved past that > > > > > > > > > > > > > one and now insist on the existence of gravity quanta? > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've never insisted on the existence of gravitons, which is the term > > > > > > > > > > > > for gravity quanta. As I told you, they are considered likely, but we > > > > > > > > > > > > don't have experimental evidence for them yet. > > > > > > > > > > Gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter..- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > You're funny. You have this idea that what you say is correct until > > > > > > > > somebody can explain it otherwise in a way that you believe.. > > > > > > > > > PD > > > > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory, to date. > > > > > > > No, it isn't. It's absurd nonsense. You don't think so, but other > > > > > > people do. > > > > > > > In science, the way to establish correctness is to demonstrate its > > > > > > ability to make accurate quantitative predictions of observational > > > > > > measurements. This is the ONLY way in science to establish > > > > > > correctness. > > > > > > > I realize that you want there to be another metric, but there isn't. > > > > > > Period. Tough luck. Try again. > > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory, to date. > > > > > No, it isn't. It's absurd nonsense. You don't think so, but other > > > > people do. > > > > > Repeating it does not make it any less absurd nonsense. > > > > > 7+19=35. > > > > What physically occurs in nature to cause the future to determine the > > > past? > > > > What physically occurs in nature to cause space to become 'unflat'? > > > > What physically occurs in nature to cause 'virtual' particles to exist > > > out of nothing? > > > > What physically occurs in nature to void conservation of momentum when > > > a downgraded photon pair are created (i.e. in order for there to be > > > conservation of momentum the downgraded photon pair have opposite > > > angular momentums) and allow for instantaneous action at a distance? > > > > In AD, the future does not determine the past. A C-60 molecule enters > > > and exits a single slit and the associated aether displacement wave > > > enters and exits the available slits. > > > > In AD, physical space is displaced by matter. > > > > In AD, aether displaced by matter (i.e. the plates in the Casimir > > > Effect) exerts pressure towards the matter doing the displacing. This > > > forces the plates in the Casimir Effect together. > > > > In AD, conservation of momentum is not simply ignored when a > > > downgraded photon pair are created. The downgraded photon pair have > > > opposite angular momentums in order to maintain the original photon's > > > momentum. > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory, to date. > > > "Most correct" in science is not established by having a short, pithy > > response to "what is physically happening" questions. > > "Most correct" in science is established by the theory being able to > > make quantitative predictions of measurable phenomena accurately. > > The second is indispensable. The first is answered only in pieces in > > science, and always leaves room for more questions. > > > You have it flipped around. This will be a problem for you until you > > learn what science is about. > > > Stop living in your dreamworld. > > > PD > > Someone who chooses to believe the future determines the past does not > understand science. > > What occurs physically in nature for the future to determine the past? > > Someone who says gravity is 'unflat' space and when asked how space > physically becomes 'unflat' says, I don't know does not understand > science. > > What occurs physically in nature to cause space to become 'unflat'? > > Someone who chooses to believe in 'virtual' particles which exist out > of nothing does not understand science. > > What occurs physically in nature to cause 'virtual' particles to exist > out of nothing? > > Someone who ignores conservation of momentum in a downgraded photon > pair in order to believe in instantaneous action at a distance does > not understand science. > > What occurs physically in nature to allow you to ignore conservation > of momentum? > > In AD, the future does not determine the past. A C-60 molecule enters > and exits a single slit and the associated aether displacement wave > enters and exits the available slits. > > In AD, physical space is displaced by matter. > > In AD, aether displaced by matter (i.e. the plates in the Casimir > Effect) exerts pressure towards the matter doing the displacing. This > forces the plates in the Casimir Effect together. > > In AD, conservation of momentum is not simply ignored when a > downgraded photon pair are created. The downgraded photon pair have > opposite angular momentums in order to maintain the original photon's > momentum. > > In AD, in a double slit experiment with a C-60 molecule, the C-60 > molecule enters and exits a single slit and the associated aether > displacement wave enters and exits the available slits. See de Broglie > wave mechanics for more information. > > In AD, gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter. > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory, to date. Making cut-and-paste posts, mpc, even if amended with a small addition, are an abuse of the newsgroup, and could warrant cancellation of your membership to the group, not to mention cancellation of your account with your ISP. Several people on the newsgroup have been canned for the same thing. Could you please consider modifying this knee-jerk behavior?
From: mpc755 on 24 Mar 2010 14:27 On Mar 24, 2:20 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 24, 12:05 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > In article <3e186367-b091-43c2-8fb9-16cf3f631204 > > @y17g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com says... > > > > On Mar 24, 10:57 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 24, 10:48 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 24, 9:41 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 24, 10:39 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 6:23 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 6:19 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 5:15 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 6:13 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 5:08 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 6:01 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 4:50 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You enter the class room and begin to discuss how the future > > > > > > > > > > > > > > determines the past > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yup, and then I show the experimental evidence, so they can judge for > > > > > > > > > > > > > themselves. Very few of them choose to disbelieve the evidence. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any experiment you provide as evidence can be explained as waves > > > > > > > > > > > > propagating available paths and particles traveling a single path. > > > > > > > > > > > > Explanations in physics involve calculations and comparison with > > > > > > > > > > > quantitative measurements. > > > > > > > > > > > Demonstrate that this explanation exists. > > > > > > > > > > > > > This will also show your state of delusional denial.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and how wave function probabilities are physical > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wave functions are physical. Probabilities are numerical results you > > > > > > > > > > > > > get from calculating the behavior of wave functions. I can't help it > > > > > > > > > > > > > if you have trouble with the words. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and how space is 'unflat' but does not move > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then that will be the first time. > > > > > > > > > > > > First time for who? > > > > > > > > > > > It woudld be the first time you explained what occurs physically in > > > > > > > > > > nature for space to be 'unflat'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and how you do not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > understand what occurs physically in nature to cause gravity. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > This will also be the first time you explained it. > > > > > > > > > > > > First time I explained what? > > > > > > > > > > > It woudld be the first time you explained what occurs physically in > > > > > > > > > > nature for space to be 'unflat'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > still insist on the existence of gravitons or have you moved past that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > one and now insist on the existence of gravity quanta? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've never insisted on the existence of gravitons, which is the term > > > > > > > > > > > > > for gravity quanta. As I told you, they are considered likely, but we > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't have experimental evidence for them yet. > > > > > > > > > > > Gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > You're funny. You have this idea that what you say is correct until > > > > > > > > > somebody can explain it otherwise in a way that you believe. > > > > > > > > > > PD > > > > > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory, to date. > > > > > > > > No, it isn't. It's absurd nonsense. You don't think so, but other > > > > > > > people do. > > > > > > > > In science, the way to establish correctness is to demonstrate its > > > > > > > ability to make accurate quantitative predictions of observational > > > > > > > measurements. This is the ONLY way in science to establish > > > > > > > correctness. > > > > > > > > I realize that you want there to be another metric, but there isn't. > > > > > > > Period. Tough luck. Try again. > > > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory, to date.. > > > > > > No, it isn't. It's absurd nonsense. You don't think so, but other > > > > > people do. > > > > > > Repeating it does not make it any less absurd nonsense. > > > > > > 7+19=35. > > > > > What physically occurs in nature to cause the future to determine the > > > > past? > > > > > What physically occurs in nature to cause space to become 'unflat'? > > > > > What physically occurs in nature to cause 'virtual' particles to exist > > > > out of nothing? > > > > > What physically occurs in nature to void conservation of momentum when > > > > a downgraded photon pair are created (i.e. in order for there to be > > > > conservation of momentum the downgraded photon pair have opposite > > > > angular momentums) and allow for instantaneous action at a distance? > > > > > In AD, the future does not determine the past. A C-60 molecule enters > > > > and exits a single slit and the associated aether displacement wave > > > > enters and exits the available slits. > > > > > In AD, physical space is displaced by matter. > > > > > In AD, aether displaced by matter (i.e. the plates in the Casimir > > > > Effect) exerts pressure towards the matter doing the displacing. This > > > > forces the plates in the Casimir Effect together. > > > > > In AD, conservation of momentum is not simply ignored when a > > > > downgraded photon pair are created. The downgraded photon pair have > > > > opposite angular momentums in order to maintain the original photon's > > > > momentum. > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory, to date. > > > > "Most correct" in science is not established by having a short, pithy > > > response to "what is physically happening" questions. > > > "Most correct" in science is established by the theory being able to > > > make quantitative predictions of measurable phenomena accurately. > > > The second is indispensable. The first is answered only in pieces in > > > science, and always leaves room for more questions. > > > > You have it flipped around. This will be a problem for you until you > > > learn what science is about. > > > > Stop living in your dreamworld. > > > > PD > > > Someone who chooses to believe the future determines the past does not > > understand science. > > > What occurs physically in nature for the future to determine the past? > > > Someone who says gravity is 'unflat' space and when asked how space > > physically becomes 'unflat' says, I don't know does not understand > > science. > > > What occurs physically in nature to cause space to become 'unflat'? > > > Someone who chooses to believe in 'virtual' particles which exist out > > of nothing does not understand science. > > > What occurs physically in nature to cause 'virtual' particles to exist > > out of nothing? > > > Someone who ignores conservation of momentum in a downgraded photon > > pair in order to believe in instantaneous action at a distance does > > not understand science. > > > What occurs physically in nature to allow you to ignore conservation > > of momentum? > > > In AD, the future does not determine the past. A C-60 molecule enters > > and exits a single slit and the associated aether displacement wave > > enters and exits the available slits. > > > In AD, physical space is displaced by matter. > > > In AD, aether displaced by matter (i.e. the plates in the Casimir > > Effect) exerts pressure towards the matter doing the displacing. This > > forces the plates in the Casimir Effect together. > > > In AD, conservation of momentum is not simply ignored when a > > downgraded photon pair are created. The downgraded photon pair have > > opposite angular momentums in order to maintain the original photon's > > momentum. > > > In AD, in a double slit experiment with a C-60 molecule, the C-60 > > molecule enters and exits a single slit and the associated aether > > displacement wave enters and exits the available slits. See de Broglie > > wave mechanics for more information. > > > In AD, gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter. > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory, to date. > > Making cut-and-paste posts, mpc, even if amended with a small > addition, are an abuse of the newsgroup, and could warrant > cancellation of your membership to the group, not to mention > cancellation of your account with your ISP. Several people on the > newsgroup have been canned for the same thing. Could you please > consider modifying this knee-jerk behavior? Is this your response because you can not answer the questions? Someone who chooses to believe the future determines the past does not understand science. What occurs physically in nature for the future to determine the past? Someone who says gravity is 'unflat' space and when asked how space physically becomes 'unflat' says, I don't know does not understand science. What occurs physically in nature to cause space to become 'unflat'? Someone who chooses to believe in 'virtual' particles which exist out of nothing does not understand science. What occurs physically in nature to cause 'virtual' particles to exist out of nothing? Someone who ignores conservation of momentum in a downgraded photon pair in order to believe in instantaneous action at a distance does not understand science. What occurs physically in nature to allow you to ignore conservation of momentum? In AD, the future does not determine the past. A C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit and the associated aether displacement wave enters and exits the available slits. In AD, physical space is displaced by matter. In AD, aether displaced by matter (i.e. the plates in the Casimir Effect) exerts pressure towards the matter doing the displacing. This forces the plates in the Casimir Effect together. In AD, conservation of momentum is not simply ignored when a downgraded photon pair are created. The downgraded photon pair have opposite angular momentums in order to maintain the original photon's momentum. In AD, in a double slit experiment with a C-60 molecule, the C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit and the associated aether displacement wave enters and exits the available slits. See de Broglie wave mechanics for more information. In AD, gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter. Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory, to date.
From: mpc755 on 24 Mar 2010 14:31 On Mar 24, 2:20 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Making cut-and-paste posts, mpc, even if amended with a small > addition, are an abuse of the newsgroup, and could warrant > cancellation of your membership to the group, not to mention > cancellation of your account with your ISP. Several people on the > newsgroup have been canned for the same thing. Could you please > consider modifying this knee-jerk behavior? Is this your response because you can not answer the questions? Someone who chooses to believe the future determines the past does not understand science. What occurs physically in nature for the future to determine the past? Someone who says gravity is 'unflat' space and when asked how space physically becomes 'unflat' says, I don't know does not understand science. What occurs physically in nature to cause space to become 'unflat'? Someone who chooses to believe in 'virtual' particles which exist out of nothing does not understand science. What occurs physically in nature to cause 'virtual' particles to exist out of nothing? Someone who ignores conservation of momentum in a downgraded photon pair in order to believe in instantaneous action at a distance does not understand science. What occurs physically in nature to allow you to ignore conservation of momentum? In AD, the future does not determine the past. A C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit and the associated aether displacement wave enters and exits the available slits. In AD, physical space is displaced by matter. In AD, aether displaced by matter (i.e. the plates in the Casimir Effect) exerts pressure towards the matter doing the displacing. This forces the plates in the Casimir Effect together. In AD, conservation of momentum is not simply ignored when a downgraded photon pair are created. The downgraded photon pair have opposite angular momentums in order to maintain the original photon's momentum. In AD, in a double slit experiment with a C-60 molecule, the C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit and the associated aether displacement wave enters and exits the available slits. See de Broglie wave mechanics for more information. In AD, gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter. Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory, to date.
From: PD on 24 Mar 2010 14:32
On Mar 24, 1:27 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 24, 2:20 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 24, 12:05 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > In article <3e186367-b091-43c2-8fb9-16cf3f631204 > > > @y17g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com says... > > > > > On Mar 24, 10:57 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 24, 10:48 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 24, 9:41 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mar 24, 10:39 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 6:23 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 6:19 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 5:15 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 6:13 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 5:08 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 6:01 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 4:50 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You enter the class room and begin to discuss how the future > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > determines the past > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yup, and then I show the experimental evidence, so they can judge for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > themselves. Very few of them choose to disbelieve the evidence. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any experiment you provide as evidence can be explained as waves > > > > > > > > > > > > > propagating available paths and particles traveling a single path. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Explanations in physics involve calculations and comparison with > > > > > > > > > > > > quantitative measurements. > > > > > > > > > > > > Demonstrate that this explanation exists. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This will also show your state of delusional denial. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and how wave function probabilities are physical > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wave functions are physical. Probabilities are numerical results you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > get from calculating the behavior of wave functions. I can't help it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if you have trouble with the words. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and how space is 'unflat' but does not move > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then that will be the first time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > First time for who? > > > > > > > > > > > > It woudld be the first time you explained what occurs physically in > > > > > > > > > > > nature for space to be 'unflat'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and how you do not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > understand what occurs physically in nature to cause gravity. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This will also be the first time you explained it.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > First time I explained what? > > > > > > > > > > > > It woudld be the first time you explained what occurs physically in > > > > > > > > > > > nature for space to be 'unflat'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > still insist on the existence of gravitons or have you moved past that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > one and now insist on the existence of gravity quanta? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've never insisted on the existence of gravitons, which is the term > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for gravity quanta. As I told you, they are considered likely, but we > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't have experimental evidence for them yet. > > > > > > > > > > > > Gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > You're funny. You have this idea that what you say is correct until > > > > > > > > > > somebody can explain it otherwise in a way that you believe. > > > > > > > > > > > PD > > > > > > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory, to date. > > > > > > > > > No, it isn't. It's absurd nonsense. You don't think so, but other > > > > > > > > people do. > > > > > > > > > In science, the way to establish correctness is to demonstrate its > > > > > > > > ability to make accurate quantitative predictions of observational > > > > > > > > measurements. This is the ONLY way in science to establish > > > > > > > > correctness. > > > > > > > > > I realize that you want there to be another metric, but there isn't. > > > > > > > > Period. Tough luck. Try again. > > > > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory, to date. > > > > > > > No, it isn't. It's absurd nonsense. You don't think so, but other > > > > > > people do. > > > > > > > Repeating it does not make it any less absurd nonsense. > > > > > > > 7+19=35. > > > > > > What physically occurs in nature to cause the future to determine the > > > > > past? > > > > > > What physically occurs in nature to cause space to become 'unflat'? > > > > > > What physically occurs in nature to cause 'virtual' particles to exist > > > > > out of nothing? > > > > > > What physically occurs in nature to void conservation of momentum when > > > > > a downgraded photon pair are created (i.e. in order for there to be > > > > > conservation of momentum the downgraded photon pair have opposite > > > > > angular momentums) and allow for instantaneous action at a distance? > > > > > > In AD, the future does not determine the past. A C-60 molecule enters > > > > > and exits a single slit and the associated aether displacement wave > > > > > enters and exits the available slits. > > > > > > In AD, physical space is displaced by matter. > > > > > > In AD, aether displaced by matter (i.e. the plates in the Casimir > > > > > Effect) exerts pressure towards the matter doing the displacing. This > > > > > forces the plates in the Casimir Effect together. > > > > > > In AD, conservation of momentum is not simply ignored when a > > > > > downgraded photon pair are created. The downgraded photon pair have > > > > > opposite angular momentums in order to maintain the original photon's > > > > > momentum. > > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory, to date. > > > > > "Most correct" in science is not established by having a short, pithy > > > > response to "what is physically happening" questions. > > > > "Most correct" in science is established by the theory being able to > > > > make quantitative predictions of measurable phenomena accurately. > > > > The second is indispensable. The first is answered only in pieces in > > > > science, and always leaves room for more questions. > > > > > You have it flipped around. This will be a problem for you until you > > > > learn what science is about. > > > > > Stop living in your dreamworld. > > > > > PD > > > > Someone who chooses to believe the future determines the past does not > > > understand science. > > > > What occurs physically in nature for the future to determine the past? > > > > Someone who says gravity is 'unflat' space and when asked how space > > > physically becomes 'unflat' says, I don't know does not understand > > > science. > > > > What occurs physically in nature to cause space to become 'unflat'? > > > > Someone who chooses to believe in 'virtual' particles which exist out > > > of nothing does not understand science. > > > > What occurs physically in nature to cause 'virtual' particles to exist > > > out of nothing? > > > > Someone who ignores conservation of momentum in a downgraded photon > > > pair in order to believe in instantaneous action at a distance does > > > not understand science. > > > > What occurs physically in nature to allow you to ignore conservation > > > of momentum? > > > > In AD, the future does not determine the past. A C-60 molecule enters > > > and exits a single slit and the associated aether displacement wave > > > enters and exits the available slits. > > > > In AD, physical space is displaced by matter. > > > > In AD, aether displaced by matter (i.e. the plates in the Casimir > > > Effect) exerts pressure towards the matter doing the displacing. This > > > forces the plates in the Casimir Effect together. > > > > In AD, conservation of momentum is not simply ignored when a > > > downgraded photon pair are created. The downgraded photon pair have > > > opposite angular momentums in order to maintain the original photon's > > > momentum. > > > > In AD, in a double slit experiment with a C-60 molecule, the C-60 > > > molecule enters and exits a single slit and the associated aether > > > displacement wave enters and exits the available slits. See de Broglie > > > wave mechanics for more information. > > > > In AD, gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter. > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory, to date. > > > Making cut-and-paste posts, mpc, even if amended with a small > > addition, are an abuse of the newsgroup, and could warrant > > cancellation of your membership to the group, not to mention > > cancellation of your account with your ISP. Several people on the > > newsgroup have been canned for the same thing. Could you please > > consider modifying this knee-jerk behavior? > > Is this your response because you can not answer the questions? Since the below is a repetition of many earlier posts, and since the line above is a one-line addition to the repetition, and since you did this despite a polite request by more than one person to cease the behavior, this has been reported as spam, in violation of Google groups policy, and to your internet provider. > > Someone who chooses to believe the future determines the past does not > understand science. > > What occurs physically in nature for the future to determine the past? > > Someone who says gravity is 'unflat' space and when asked how space > physically becomes 'unflat' says, I don't know does not understand > science. > > What occurs physically in nature to cause space to become 'unflat'? > > Someone who chooses to believe in 'virtual' particles which exist out > of nothing does not understand science. > > What occurs physically in nature to cause 'virtual' particles to exist > out of nothing? > > Someone who ignores conservation of momentum in a downgraded photon > pair in order to believe in instantaneous action at a distance does > not understand science. > > What occurs physically in nature to allow you to ignore conservation > of momentum? > > In AD, the future does not determine the past. A C-60 molecule enters > and exits a single slit and the associated aether displacement wave > enters and exits the available... > > read more » |