There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!
in [Physics]
|
From: spudnik on 22 Apr 2010 19:58 yeah, Maxwell's Demon -- and rocks o'light! can you explain the existence of antimatter, or whether Univere should be made, half of it? you certainly are not much at explaining Young's experiment; perhaps you might read Young's explanation. stop Waxman's capNtrade TeraBailout of Wall St. and The City! (see my sig.) thus: that formula was not from Coriolis; it was Leibniz's "vis viva," where, before, hacks like Galileo didn't use the second powering of the velocity. thus: aren't you referring to Maxwell's Demon, a merely thought experiment. yes, "preactically," there is no vacuum -- just get Pascal to see that! well, you seem to really believe in your tiny theory, interestingly; it just doesn't go any where. > The mechanism by which vacuum chambers can get out the > matter isn't the power of the suction, it is the random motion of the > individual atoms that remain inside the chambers, AND the > functionality of the valve that keeps the evacuated matter out. > Practically speaking, there is no 'perfect' vacuum. Interestingly, thus: as the only known (to me) student of Bucky, I say, he was Are Buckafka Fullofit on pi ... but, dood, do you know the surfer's value?... it's not in _Synergetics_: http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/synergetics.html > Bucky Fuller explained that nature doesn't think pi is 3.1416... thus: this reminds me of the old Ultraviolet Catastrophe, when you take Hubble's opinion about the redshift, being directly related to speeding-away ... and there is no antilight; only antimatter. what lies within the visible universe is still very, very hard to elaborate, at very high redshifts, but there are plenty of goofy theories. thus: unfortuantely for Olber, almost all of Universe is red- shifted out of visible spectra, including most blue- shifters, due supposedly to Hubble's being hounded into saying that the shift is "Dopplerian." thus: the main, supposedly unsolved anomaly is that the winters & nights are "warmer" than the days and summers. now, how on Earth could that, be? the problem is that, although the GCMs are frought with nearly irreducible uncertainties re clouds & vapor, virtually all of the changes that effect these are made by men on land; whereas the hydro cycle at sea is some- what more of a constant. that's why, they call it, the Anthropocene (viz, the typical passive solar take on the urban heat islands, and the UNIPCC's supposed fudge-factor to cover them, which never seems to come-up in the actual articles in the actual journals). thus: R. Bucky Fuller was a funny guy, and your spiel about orbit is a perfect counter to his blather about pi. on the other hand, the vast majority of earth scientists don't know spherical trig., which Bucky did, in the command of a naval vessel, just before radio came in (in their GCMs etc., the poles are singularities, as in a Mercator projection ... but the space-science folks are *all* about the poles .-) see color plates one & two in _Synergetics_. http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/synergetics.html thus: space-time is merely ordinary phase-space, properly seen, a la Lanczos' use of quaternions -- Death to the lightcone; long-live the lightcone-heads! so, are biquaternions non-associative, like octonions? poor Minkowski, made his bizzare slogan about time *qua* the graphed *function* on a piece of paper, and then he died, and that ain't electronics *or* rocketscience (like Bucky saith, It is *all* rocketscience .-) the great geometer Minkowski, alas, puts his pants on, one lightcone at a time, like any one else. --No Cap and Trade Bailout for Wall Street and The City! to whom it concerns; as I comprehend it, after briefly speaking with Waxman at UCLA, his bill does the same as his '91 cap&trade bill under HW, on SO2 and NOx (viz, acid rain); that is, it is just a nostrum of "frere trade." if Dubya had known that Kyoto was just another cap&trade "free trade" nostrum, he'd have signed it, since he has been thoroughly indoctrinated in the MBA school on "British Liberal Free Trade" (cotton, sugar & slavery, why the British organized and supported Secession with ships & materiel) -- what the Revolution was about -- not just, Taxation without representation, a la the Tea Party effetes and the Encyclopedia Brittaninca! Waxman perhaps has been too long on the job; when I spoke to him at the Faculty Center, he seemed to be on drugs, a marked difference form when I saw him in P.Palisades. anyway, as I asked him, Why can't we just have a very small Carbon Tax, instead of letting the arbitrageurs run the bull & bear hijinx? as they say, the bears make money, the bulls make money, and the hogs always get slaughtered. none of the (two) experts, I have read or asked, thought that a tax wouldn't work as well, just that it was somehow politically impossible. --sooner,bri
From: spudnik on 26 Apr 2010 15:53 so, "Aether Displacement is a unified theory," deserving of capitalization?... well, what this is really about, is my net-addiction, because you would otherwise not be so God-am "productive," without the goading of my own predeliction. so, let me quote from the LaRouche site's lead-article: Max Planck began his series of lectures on thermodynamics in 1909 by asserting that science is the systematic investigation of sense perceptions. Our concepts of basic principles, like force, come from those senses. The task of science "consists only in the relating of sense perceptions, in accordance with experience, to fixed laws." Those laws were, themselves, always brought closer and closer into line with experience. But, this description was only a trap for the unsuspecting, for Planck then made an about-face, and asserted that, "ladies and gentlemen, this view has never contributed to any advance in physics." Relating the sense perceptions to one another with mathematics, and pulling logical derivations out of those relations, can be quite interesting, but this could never, in itself, derive a new discovery of principle. The generation of new knowledge about the universe comes from a world different from that of sense perception, but one which the human mind has access to. .... The concepts "material" and "energetic" are thus well defined. Material is the stuff you can sense, and energetic is why you can sense it. Energetic phenomena are generally continuous, while material phenomena are generally discrete. Who would mistake the light emitted from a light bulb, for the light bulb itself? But, are these two concepts really so well defined? http://larouchepub.com/lym/2010/3716new_periodic_table.html ane, have a very nice day/life!
From: mpc755 on 26 Apr 2010 19:37 On Apr 26, 3:53 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > so, "Aether Displacement is a unified theory," deserving > of capitalization? Correct.
From: NoEinstein on 26 Apr 2010 23:21 On Apr 26, 7:37 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 26, 3:53 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > so, "Aether Displacement is a unified theory," deserving > > of capitalization? > > Correct. WRONG... and WRONG again!! NE
From: mpc755 on 26 Apr 2010 23:23
On Apr 26, 11:21 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Apr 26, 7:37 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Apr 26, 3:53 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > so, "Aether Displacement is a unified theory," deserving > > > of capitalization? > > > Correct. > > WRONG... and WRONG again!! NE Aether and matter are different states of the same material. Aether is displaced by matter. Displacement creates pressure. Gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter. A C-60 molecule displaces the aether. A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the wave. The C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double slit experiment. The associated aether displacement wave enters and exits the available slits. When the aether displacement wave exits the slits it creates interference which alters the direction the C-60 molecule travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the associated aether displacement wave (i.e. turns it into chop) and there is no interference. Aether Displacement is a unified theory. Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date. |