From: mpc755 on
On Apr 28, 9:32 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Apr 27, 8:43 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey fellow:  Please hawk your stupidity on your own post(s).  You are
> no longer welcome, here!  — NoEinstein —
>

Aether and matter are different states of the same material.
Aether is displaced by matter.
Displacement creates pressure.
Gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter.

A C-60 molecule displaces the aether.

A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The
C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the wave. The
C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double slit
experiment. The associated aether displacement wave enters and exits
the available slits. When the aether displacement wave exits the slits
it creates interference which alters the direction the C-60 molecule
travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the
associated aether displacement wave (i.e. turns it into chop) and
there is no interference.

Aether Displacement is a unified theory.

Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date.
From: NoEinstein on
On Apr 28, 9:51 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
Hey fellow: Please hawk your stupidity on your own post(s). You are
no longer welcome, here! — NoEinstein —
>
> On Apr 28, 9:32 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 27, 8:43 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey fellow:  Please hawk your stupidity on your own post(s).  You are
> > no longer welcome, here!  — NoEinstein —
>
> Aether and matter are different states of the same material.
> Aether is displaced by matter.
> Displacement creates pressure.
> Gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter.
>
> A C-60 molecule displaces the aether.
>
> A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The
> C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the wave. The
> C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double slit
> experiment. The associated aether displacement wave enters and exits
> the available slits. When the aether displacement wave exits the slits
> it creates interference which alters the direction the C-60 molecule
> travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the
> associated aether displacement wave (i.e. turns it into chop) and
> there is no interference.
>
> Aether Displacement is a unified theory.
>
> Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date.

From: mpc755 on
On Apr 28, 10:17 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Apr 28, 9:51 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey fellow:  Please hawk your stupidity on your own post(s).  You are
> no longer welcome, here!  — NoEinstein —
>

The aether does not 'flow' towards matter.

Gravitation, the 'Dark Matter' Effect and the Fine Structure Constant
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0401047

"However this is not a ‘flow’ of some form of ‘matter’ through space,
as previously considered in the aether models or in the ‘random’
particulate Le Sage kinetic theory of gravity, rather the flow is an
ongoing rearrangement of the quantum-foam patterns that form space,
and indeed only have a geometrical description at a coarse-grained
level. Then the ‘flow’ in one region is relative only to the patterns
in nearby regions, and not relative to some a priori background
geometrical space"

What is mistaken as 'flow' is the pressure the aether exerts towards
the matter.

The aether displaced by the matter is the "ongoing rearrangement of
the quantum-foam patterns that form space".

"Then the ‘flow’ in one region is relative only to the patterns in
nearby regions" is the pressure exerted by the aether towards the
matter where the state of the aether as determined by its connections
with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is
the aether's state of displacement.
From: mpc755 on
On Apr 28, 10:17 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Apr 28, 9:51 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey fellow:  Please hawk your stupidity on your own post(s).  You are
> no longer welcome, here!  — NoEinstein —
>

The aether does not 'flow' towards matter.

Gravitation, the 'Dark Matter' Effect and the Fine Structure Constant
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0401047

"However this is not a ‘flow’ of some form of ‘matter’ through space,
as previously considered in the aether models or in the ‘random’
particulate Le Sage kinetic theory of gravity, rather the flow is an
ongoing rearrangement of the quantum-foam patterns that form space,
and indeed only have a geometrical description at a coarse-grained
level. Then the ‘flow’ in one region is relative only to the patterns
in nearby regions, and not relative to some a priori background
geometrical space"

What is mistaken as 'flow' is the pressure the aether exerts towards
the matter.

The aether displaced by the matter is the "ongoing rearrangement of
the quantum-foam patterns that form space".

"Then the ‘flow’ in one region is relative only to the patterns in
nearby regions" is the pressure exerted by the aether towards the
matter where the state of the aether as determined by its connections
with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is
the aether's state of displacement.
From: NoEinstein on
On Apr 28, 10:24 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
Hey fellow: Please hawk your stupidity on your own post(s). You are
no longer welcome, here! — NoEinstein —
>
> On Apr 28, 10:17 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 28, 9:51 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey fellow:  Please hawk your stupidity on your own post(s).  You are
> > no longer welcome, here!  — NoEinstein —
>
> The aether does not 'flow' towards matter.
>
> Gravitation, the 'Dark Matter' Effect and the Fine Structure Constanthttp://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0401047
>
> "However this is not a ‘flow’ of some form of ‘matter’ through space,
> as previously considered in the aether models or in the ‘random’
> particulate Le Sage kinetic theory of gravity, rather the flow is an
> ongoing rearrangement of the quantum-foam patterns that form space,
> and indeed only have a geometrical description at a coarse-grained
> level. Then the ‘flow’ in one region is relative only to the patterns
> in nearby regions, and not relative to some a priori background
> geometrical space"
>
> What is mistaken as 'flow' is the pressure the aether exerts towards
> the matter.
>
> The aether displaced by the matter is the "ongoing rearrangement of
> the quantum-foam patterns that form space".
>
> "Then the ‘flow’ in one region is relative only to the patterns in
> nearby regions" is the pressure exerted by the aether towards the
> matter where the state of the aether as determined by its connections
> with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is
> the aether's state of displacement.