There is no "pull" of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!
in [Physics]
|
Prev: "The Einstein Hoax"
Next: ALL DIZEAZZEZ ARE DEZERVED ! ESPECIALLY THE CANCER GOODY, BACKBONE OF THE JUICY DIZEAZZEZ INDUSTRY
From: Raymond Yohros on 23 Apr 2010 15:59 On Apr 22, 9:18 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > Dear Raymond: Thankfully, for TRUE Science, it isn't necessary that > you... buy... anything. But science progress will be swifter if you > will keep out of the way! NoEinstein > swifter for you perhaps!
From: NoEinstein on 22 Apr 2010 21:53 On Apr 21, 4:26 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 21, 2:28 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Apr 20, 5:17 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear spudnik: While I was a student at Clemson, I attended two > > lectures (in different years) of Robert B. Fuller. He was a 'head-in- > > the-clouds' guy. But I learned that "nature" doesn't construct things > > with curves. The reason pi is an infinitely repeating decimal is > > because circles are actually (in nature) constructed of short straight- > > line segments rather than curves. And the number of segments will > > always a whole number. NoEinstein > > Oh my. > So in your mind, rational numbers and irrational numbers do not > correspond to anything in reality. Only integers. > So, where on a water droplet falling from the sky, are these straight- > line segments? > And when the Earth orbits the sun, how often does it make a quick turn > at a corner between two straight-line segments? And what kicks the > Earth from one segment to the next? > > You know you've lost your mind, right? > > PD .... You know you have no REASONING ability, right? NoEinstein
From: NoEinstein on 22 Apr 2010 22:00 On Apr 22, 4:27 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear PD, the (blockhead) Parasite Dunce: Like I said, ORBITS are NOT physical constructs. Water drops are! At atomic scales, the water drop has straight line distances to the electronsthe tunneling microscope shows such things, beautifully. NE > > On Apr 22, 3:03 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Apr 21, 4:26 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Bucky Fuller explained that nature > > doesn't think pi is 3.1416... He was right, but I don't HATE curves > > because of the fractions everywhere. NE > > You didn't answer my questions below. Where in the orbit of the earth > does it navigate a sudden corner from one straight line segment to > another? > > Either answer the question, John, or retract your earlier statement, > which was clearly foolish. > > > > > > > > On Apr 21, 2:28 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 20, 5:17 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear spudnik: While I was a student at Clemson, I attended two > > > > lectures (in different years) of Robert B. Fuller. He was a 'head-in- > > > > the-clouds' guy. But I learned that "nature" doesn't construct things > > > > with curves. The reason pi is an infinitely repeating decimal is > > > > because circles are actually (in nature) constructed of short straight- > > > > line segments rather than curves. And the number of segments will > > > > always a whole number. NoEinstein > > > > Oh my. > > > So in your mind, rational numbers and irrational numbers do not > > > correspond to anything in reality. Only integers. > > > So, where on a water droplet falling from the sky, are these straight- > > > line segments? > > > And when the Earth orbits the sun, how often does it make a quick turn > > > at a corner between two straight-line segments? And what kicks the > > > Earth from one segment to the next? > > > > You know you've lost your mind, right? > > > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: NoEinstein on 22 Apr 2010 22:04 On Apr 22, 5:01 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > PD... Build the orbit out of a huge Erector Set, then, the orbit will be a physical construct! And if you can note, the pieces of the Erector Set are all straight-line segments, and the number of pieces will be a whole number! HA, ha HA! NoEinstein > > On Apr 22, 3:38 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Apr 22, 4:27 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear Dunce: "Orbits" aren't physical constructs! NE > > What? The orbit of the Earth around the Sun isn't physical, John? > > Or when you say "physical constructs" are you thinking man-made > structures, like sheds and sports arenas? > > > > > > > > On Apr 22, 3:03 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 21, 4:26 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Bucky Fuller explained that nature > > > > doesn't think pi is 3.1416... He was right, but I don't HATE curves > > > > because of the fractions everywhere. NE > > > > You didn't answer my questions below. Where in the orbit of the earth > > > does it navigate a sudden corner from one straight line segment to > > > another? > > > > Either answer the question, John, or retract your earlier statement, > > > which was clearly foolish. > > > > > > On Apr 21, 2:28 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 20, 5:17 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear spudnik: While I was a student at Clemson, I attended two > > > > > > lectures (in different years) of Robert B. Fuller. He was a 'head-in- > > > > > > the-clouds' guy. But I learned that "nature" doesn't construct things > > > > > > with curves. The reason pi is an infinitely repeating decimal is > > > > > > because circles are actually (in nature) constructed of short straight- > > > > > > line segments rather than curves. And the number of segments will > > > > > > always a whole number. NoEinstein > > > > > > Oh my. > > > > > So in your mind, rational numbers and irrational numbers do not > > > > > correspond to anything in reality. Only integers. > > > > > So, where on a water droplet falling from the sky, are these straight- > > > > > line segments? > > > > > And when the Earth orbits the sun, how often does it make a quick turn > > > > > at a corner between two straight-line segments? And what kicks the > > > > > Earth from one segment to the next? > > > > > > You know you've lost your mind, right? > > > > > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: NoEinstein on 22 Apr 2010 22:11
On Apr 22, 6:31 pm, Raymond Yohros <b...(a)birdband.net> wrote: > Dear Raymond Yohros: If by the "topic's" title, you question the scienceI am the author. Should you take issue with any portion of my initial post, please elucidate. Also, give a listing of some of your personal '+new posts' so that the readers will know, for sure, that you don't know from wince you come. NoEinstein > > On Apr 22, 4:01 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Apr 22, 3:38 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Apr 22, 4:27 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear Dunce: "Orbits" aren't physical constructs! NE > > > What? The orbit of the Earth around the Sun isn't physical, John? > > > Or when you say "physical constructs" are you thinking man-made > > structures, like sheds and sports arenas? > > the funniest thing about this conversation is the > topics title! > > r.y |