From: krw on
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:56:30 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
<OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:

>On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:51:50 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:50:44 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
>><OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:18:17 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
>>><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>>>
>>>> hundred or so Nyms.
>>>
>>>
>>> An absolute lie.
>>
>>AlwaysWrong is so cute when he's outed. You may "only" be using 77 or so
>>nyms, Nymbecile, but you've used a lot more and have no problems raiding
>>mommy's hamper at any time.
>>
>
>"but you've used a lot more" No, I haven't. They are all in the
>retard's list, retard.

The plural of "retard" is "retards", not "retard's", DimBulb. ...and yes, you
certainly are.
From: Archimedes' Lever on
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:53:06 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
<krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

>On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:56:30 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
><OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:51:50 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
>><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:50:44 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
>>><OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:18:17 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
>>>><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> hundred or so Nyms.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> An absolute lie.
>>>
>>>AlwaysWrong is so cute when he's outed. You may "only" be using 77 or so
>>>nyms, Nymbecile, but you've used a lot more and have no problems raiding
>>>mommy's hamper at any time.
>>>
>>
>>"but you've used a lot more" No, I haven't. They are all in the
>>retard's list, retard.
>
>The plural of "retard" is "retards", not "retard's", DimBulb. ...and yes, you
>certainly are.

Moreof your grammar problems shine through. It was a possessive.

The retard Thompson's list.
From: WangoTango on
In article <1dl8q516k88j8ld0e4fm7re36rjodjc1d7(a)4ax.com>,
jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com says...
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:37:14 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
> <OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:51:34 -0700, John Larkin
> ><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
> >
> >>Epoxy can fail in situations like this.
> >
> > That depends entirely on the properties of the particular epoxy being
> >used. Duh.
>
>
> Thank you for another brilliant insight.

I found a recent picture of him :

http://dontclickthis.whatingods.name/cpt.obvious.jpeg

From: krw on
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 06:56:32 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
<OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:

>On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:53:06 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:56:30 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
>><OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:51:50 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
>>><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:50:44 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
>>>><OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:18:17 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
>>>>><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> hundred or so Nyms.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> An absolute lie.
>>>>
>>>>AlwaysWrong is so cute when he's outed. You may "only" be using 77 or so
>>>>nyms, Nymbecile, but you've used a lot more and have no problems raiding
>>>>mommy's hamper at any time.
>>>>
>>>
>>>"but you've used a lot more" No, I haven't. They are all in the
>>>retard's list, retard.
>>
>>The plural of "retard" is "retards", not "retard's", DimBulb. ...and yes, you
>>certainly are.
>
> Moreof your grammar problems shine through. It was a possessive.

Wrong, AlwaysWrong. You pointed to a list of retards.

> The retard Thompson's list.

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Prev: 1905 San Francisco
Next: ECL open input default state