From: spudnik on
first of all, there is no "empty space," in the sense
of Pascal's (assumedly perfect) Plenum -- which he discovered,
by experiment. second, as was told by the keynoter
at the 9th Annual Conference on Nonlinear Science,
Newton stole the inverse 2nd-power law from Hooke (and, anyway,
it has been said, the necessary math came from Huyghens and
others, algebraize Kepler's orbital constraints).

> consequence. BUT Newton also had no earthly idea why the radial
> dependence of the gravitational law went as the inverse of the square,
> nor did he have any account of how that force could reach across empty
> space without an intermediary. Thus any illusion you have of the

> I think the main difficulty you suffer from is that you are
> comfortable with the mental concepts surrounding Newtonian gravity
> fields, but are not comfortable with the mental concepts surrounding a

--les ducs d'oil!
http://tarpley.net