Prev: Deepwater Horizon BP Oil Spill - A Geophysical Theory That Needs Consideration
Next: EINSTEINIANA: THE FUNDAMENTAL NIGHTMARE
From: spudnik on 14 Jul 2010 23:29 first of all, there is no "empty space," in the sense of Pascal's (assumedly perfect) Plenum -- which he discovered, by experiment. second, as was told by the keynoter at the 9th Annual Conference on Nonlinear Science, Newton stole the inverse 2nd-power law from Hooke (and, anyway, it has been said, the necessary math came from Huyghens and others, algebraize Kepler's orbital constraints). > consequence. BUT Newton also had no earthly idea why the radial > dependence of the gravitational law went as the inverse of the square, > nor did he have any account of how that force could reach across empty > space without an intermediary. Thus any illusion you have of the > I think the main difficulty you suffer from is that you are > comfortable with the mental concepts surrounding Newtonian gravity > fields, but are not comfortable with the mental concepts surrounding a --les ducs d'oil! http://tarpley.net |